The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa Talons Roster

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD on the grounds of notability. I proposed deletion six days ago NOT because of notability, but because the article is a content fork of San Antonio Talons, as most of the text is copied from San Antonio Talons. The team was formerly known as the Tulsa Talons. Tampabay721 (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. Additionally, the same user who contested the PROD, if you look at the talk page of the person who contested the PROD, User talk:Nalman you'll see that this is the third time the user has done so with invalid/irrelevant arguments. It seems this user is misinformed or acting in bad faith... Sergecross73 msg me 22:48, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 23:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Clearly a fork that has no reason for existing. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is already a Tulsa Talons article that redirects to San Antonio Talons, and there is not enough content in this article to justify a spinoff.—Bagumba (talk) 01:12, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete CFORK as noted. And this doesn't even seem to justify a redirect since it is unlikely to ever be useful and could even be confusing (WP:R#DELETE). Novaseminary (talk) 02:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The roster information is more suitably covered in a single article about the team. Cbl62 (talk) 05:26, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete source is the team website page.--Paul McDonald (talk) 16:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.