The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aomori, Aomori. JForget 15:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tsukuda Junior High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no separate notability, nothing to distinguish it from every other junior high doing what junior highs do. The spree killer link is dead, and if an article is necessary about his schooling, it should be the high school Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 03:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the article Aomori, Aomori. The school is operated by the City. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Education says "Most elementary and middle schools that don't source a clear claim to notability are now getting merged or redirected in AfD, with high schools being kept except where they fail verifiability. Schools that don't meet the standard typically get merged or redirected to the school district that operates them (North America) or the lowest level locality (elsewhere) rather than being completely removed from the encyclopedia." I'm sorry for creating this short article.--ACSE (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize, that is why we are all here, to create and share information. Keep up the good work. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect - As per ACSE -- that's exactly the right response. Shadowjams (talk) 09:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge/redirect to the article Aomori, Aomori per usual practice. No WP:BEFORE reasoning from nominator why a merge or redirect is not appropriate. TerriersFan (talk) 20:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's better to have a discussion like this about it than to have decided for myself that it should be redirected, should it in fact turn out to be notable. Hence no mention of merge or redirect from me. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge/redirect per above. Chris, you could have tried a bold merge, but no worries. tedder (talk) 17:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.