The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as per rough consensus. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 19:34, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tracker (granola bar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded with the rationale that it is "pretty notable in the UK", I was unable to find any reliable sources showing this. Fails notability guidelines; the sole source on the article mentions the subject only in passing. Waxworker (talk) 17:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 17:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I couldn't find anything about this bar; the provided source is a bare mention, and everything on Google is just sites selling the bar. It's just a brand name of cereal or granola bar. valereee (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:25, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:52, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is indeed a "brand name of cereal or granola bar". But then, a Mars bar is just a brand name of a chocolate bar! Certainly highly notable in the UK. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep. As part of a WP:BEFORE exercise, I found (and in several cases added) a number of sources which seem to deal with the subject as a primary topic. Granted more than a few of them are in the "re-printed press releases as trade 'journalism'" category. But, in addition to the coverage itself, some of the claims to notability in that coverage ("first cereal bar in UK", "second in market share", etc) suggest that deletion is perhaps not the best course here. Guliolopez (talk) 11:55, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per work by Guliolopez. Artw (talk) 18:36, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is a notable product with British consumers CliffordJones (talk) 15:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Guliolopez. I was also able to find [1]. I'm not sure why the majority of hits in google for a widespread consumer product being for places that sell said product is at all relevant, given that this is going to be the case for every similar product whether notable or not. Thryduulf (talk) 11:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep seems to be notable Kazanstyle (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.