The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.   jj137 ^♠ 03:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tooele Federal Credit Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Does not appear to be meeting our notability standards, at present. Tagged for notability most of this year. Lawrence Cohen 00:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article does not seem to be the subject of Reliable Sources. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 00:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete : possible WP:COPYVIO with page http://www.tfcu.net/info/history.php, from which it is obvious that some of the text in this article was copied. Mh29255 (talk) 01:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable and poorly sourced. Frank Anchor, U. S. American (talk, contribs) 01:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable credit union. Fails WP:CORP and is badly sourced. Lankiveil (talk) 05:34, 29 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]
• NO OBJECTION - I created the page. I have no objection to its being deleted. I thought there would be other additions to it from other sources. That did not happen, so let's send it to the dustbin. Raymondwinn (talk) 15:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Creator agrees -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.