The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. This discussion has been open for almost 3 weeks and no new sources have been added to the article or discussion since the nomination despite arguments that more reliable sources would be located. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stips (Israeli website)

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, as the sources are either passing references or are not independent of the subject. An attempted draftification was contested by page creator. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Israel. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please, this article is important and should not be deleted. It's overwhelming Israel recently. I know the sources are not 100%, but I'm active on the website for almost three years and I'm sure all I wrote is true. There is a number of independent sources not from Stips and I will probably find more in the future to verify all statements in the article. אוהד בר-און (talk) 09:32, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@אוהד בר-און:What you have written is probably true, however being active on the website and reporting your findings to Wikipedia is original research, which is disallowed on Wikipedia. We also need multiple significant reliable sources that are independent of the subject per WP:GNG, which is Wikipedia's fundamental notability guideline. Failing it (which this article does in my opinion) is valid grounds for deletion. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If I can find 10 more independent sources, will my article be spared? אוהד בר-און (talk) 18:14, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not about how many sources you find. The most important thing, along with being independent, is that they give lots of information about the subject instead of just mentioning it. And it might be helpful to remember that articles on Wikipedia don't belong to anyone; it's an article that you gave to Wikipedia. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this article should be deleted, even though the sources aren't the best (probably because there are only few sources in English about this Israeli site).

The article is written nicely and clearly, there's no appropriate reason to delete it. מיכאל גנפולסקי (talk) 21:58, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can use Hebrew-language sources here, if you need to. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:36, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with nominator as sources are not independent and therefore doesn’t meet GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TandyTRS80 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless someone can provide sources independent of the topic that cover it in detail. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:47, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.