The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Unsourced policial WP:SOAP, not clear expansion of existing article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:43, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Social Nationalism

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is nothing more than a biased political screed and I don't see how it can be rescued. — e. ripley\^talk 17:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been substantially improved since its origin. It gives a good summery of Nationally-based Socialist Policy over the past century. It needs to be improved by contributors willing to add references and cite sources for this article. The facts seem to be correct, just unlabeled. Even though the tone appears to be against these policies, another section supporting these policies and stating reasons that they benefit society could be added. This way, both opposing points of view will be reflected and readers can decide for themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.200.189.150 (talk • contribs)
Delete, unsourced political essay. Emily Jensen (talk) 18:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I've nominated this for speedy deletion as A10: a recently-created article that duplicates another existing topic (primarily Left-wing nationalism). — e. ripley\^talk 20:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This "article" violates one of the five pillars as well as policy. This is Wikipedia, not Americanpoliticsipedia. Kill it with fire.—S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 21:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has been marked for speedy delete, which it does not qualify for; but it is clearly a non-encyclopaedic, biased, self-opinionated political rant, and should not be here. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 21:09, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, slanted POV entry. Hairhorn (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant attempt to add political attack commentary to an encyclopedia. the phrase is used here, which is unrelated, and on Nazi websites, which i wont link to. not in common use, obvious pathetic attempt to tie liberalism to fascism, which has no supporting sources within mainstream commentary or even within advocacy journalism. basically an unsourced hate speech term. People of course have written legitimately about the connections between apparently opposite ideologies, and neo-liberalism, in its embrace of some corporate values, shows signs of overlap, but thats really not what is attempted here.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:23, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete this article, which violates WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP. Cunard (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.