The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjibsaha Aniketa (writer)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable author/academic who fails WP:N, WP:PROF. The article was created and edited almost exclusively by the subject. I prodded it earlier, but the subject blanked the prod notice. Notability is not established through references from reliable sources. Ragib (talk) 22:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. -- JN 466 23:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- JN 466 23:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- JN 466 23:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- JN 466 23:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. -- JN 466 23:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Nothing on scholar, books or news. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:21, 12 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. The sources are either self-published or unverifiable: Here is an example of the poetry:

This is the/Teen girl!/ I have ever/Seen her/Do you entrust me long/I will cover you up/With the mountain herbs/ And kindle the beauty/ Beauty of love.

The fact that the poetry (or its translation) is drivel does not, of course, make it unnotable; William McGonagall and Khalil Gibran have articles. However, the lack of reliable sources does. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 13:32, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Xxan. No reliable references. Definitely fails notability, may fail WP:V, seeing Gnews, Gbooks, scholar, etc cannot confirm and external links in article are to what looks like a self-publishing site. Ray^Talk 19:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.