The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjib Pramanik

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:AUTHOR Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 19:03, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Forget WP:AUTHOR, it could never make it that far as it fails WP:GNG in the first place. A blog and passing mentions that do not support the content do not a Wikipedia article make. --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 20:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While we're also at it, we can throw in WP:Notability (people) as grounds for deletion as well. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.