The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted per criterion A7. Keilana_(recall) 21:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Queen city Independent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Not notable; just trying to promote themselves. — Cuyler91093 - Contributions - 01:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: notability not asserted by article and no third-party references for verification per WP:V. Article written like an advertisement (WP:SPAM). Mh29255 (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This article will soon be pwned by the criteria for speedy deletion as I've tagged it as A7. No third-party sources cited.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:06, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• And four hours later, the article has still not been deleted.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.