The result was no consensus.
A quick summary of the arguments:
Note that I lumped merge, redirect, delete, and transwiki together because they used similar arguments; this grouping has no bearing on the validity of the arguments presented.
I find that there really is no consensus. If the article should be kept because it is verifiable by reliable sources, where are those sources? If the article should be deleted because reliable sources cannot be found, why are all existent sources invalid? I feel that no side really "wins" this crucial point of the debate.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources that significantly cover the term (I just plucked out Urban Dictionary), consists only of original research and a dicdef. The sources include what appears to be a thesis, a PDF that shows up blank for me, and two slang glossaries. I can't find a single source that discusses the term "pwn" in detail. Last AFD closed as keep on merit of nothing but WP:ILIKEIT votes. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]