The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 00:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palatial Crest

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is just some apartment building that doesn't pass GNG. The article doesn't even attempt to explain what's notable about it. A Google search turned up a bunch of sites about renting there, as well as a bunch of hits about a type of mattress Sealy's makes of the same name. Google News only brought up four results, all of which appear to be about Sealy's. Google Books brings yet more about Sealy's, as well as a few books about living in Hong Kong which acknowledge that it exists, but say nothing about it. Egsan Bacon (talk) 06:58, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – It's a translation of the article in the Chinese WP, on the next day by the same author. There seems to be very little information about it except at real estate agents. The architect doesn't have a website. But there is this page at Emporis, which is the reason for keep – just because it's a tall building and we normally keep those. Some of the statements don't seem to supported any more by the cites, so if it survives I think it may have to be trimmed to about 1/2 its current length. – Margin1522 (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is indicated by several sources, such as [1][2][3].--Antigng (talk) 06:36, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.