The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, not encyclopedic. Chillum 00:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nanoterrorism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Redundant article, supposedly about terrorism, but in fact only mentions accidental damage caused by fictional nanobots, such as is already covered by Grey goo KatieWay (talk) 20:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a neologism. WillOakland (talk) 02:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There was more article here some months ago, but largely it was unencyclopedic unreferencable original research. - Eldereft (cont.) 07:55, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.