The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Morag Tong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Elder Scrolls games. As Wikipedia is not a gameguide, and this is all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, it was nominated two years ago and it has still asserted no notability or referencing. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• delete entirely in-universe, no evidence of secondary sources, game cruft of no encyclopedic value. The entirely in-universe "criticisms" section is a nice touch... Pete.Hurd (talk) 16:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:FICTION. RMHED (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 13:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:NOT#GUIDE Mbisanz (talk) 03:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Valuable information, but not quite valuable enough to be deserving of an individual article.72.241.182.49 (talk) 23:36, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.