The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep Non Admin Close Dusti^SPEAK!! 19:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mohd Mardani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not an international player, and not among the top players in Singapore. Not significant enough to justify a Wiki page. Frankie goh (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Passes WP:ATHLETE as he's played in the S.League, a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per WP:BIO. Mattythewhite (talk)
• Keep per two preceding reasons. Chensiyuan (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Number57. GiantSnowman 14:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Professional player, in a professional league. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 20:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per SynergeticMaggot. This passes bio and athlete rather well. Lack of a reason to delete, suggest WP:SK. — _Maggot^Syn 01:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep - easily passes WP:ATHLETE. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Shanker. matt91486 (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.