< August 22	August 24 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Less Unless (talk) 05:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Margret Joseph[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this one seems to have plenty of sources under "Margaret Jospeh", and I've added a few. If you check Loop, the National, or the PNG Post-Courier, you ought to be able to find more. It would be nice if people bothered to check before leaping straight to AfD.--IdiotSavant (talk) 05:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per article improvement and sources being found. Giant Snowman 20:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above with new sources it passes WP:GNG and subject is 23 years with an active career hence see little point in deleting it.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. Clearly significant figure in PNG womens and international football who helped Papua New Guinea women win Papua New Guinea's only major trophy, the 2022 OFC Women's Cup. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have two articles, from the same publisher, totaling around 7 sentences of independent commentary on her youth football career. That is far from sufficient for GNG, per the extremely ample precedent of footballers deleted at AfD. Here's my full assessment of the sources in the article (excluding Oceania Football Confederation, which is obvs not independent as the governing org). 1. The National 1: four independent sentences + quotes -- not SIGCOV, and falls under YOUNGATH which requires much more significant attention than this. N. 2. TN 2: another three independent sentences, and is not independent from the other TN articles, which must be evaluated as a single source. This also falls under YOUNGATH. N 3. TN 3: passing mention, N. 4. Post Courier 1: passing mention, N. Samoa 2019: does not mention her, and not independent. N 5: PC 2: passing mention, N. JoelleJay (talk) 19:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I suspect "Margret" is just a typo, btw. Johnbod (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hopefully everyone here is aware that NSPORT requires all athlete articles have a valid source of SIGCOV cited in the article. For non-professional athletes it also explicitly excludes a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other WP:ROUTINE coverage. For high school-age athletes it further restricts the sourcing that can contribute to notability: High school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage that is: (1) independent of the subject; and (2) clearly goes beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage. The first clause excludes all school papers and school websites that cover their sports teams and other teams they compete against. The second clause excludes the majority of local coverage in both news sources and sports specific publications. It especially excludes using game play summaries, statistical results, or routine interviews as sources to establish notability.

Given these guideline requirements, which sources demonstrate the subject meets GNG? Which sources even contribute to GNG? JoelleJay (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Plainly notable, regular coverage in the two national newspapers of PNG. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. ✗plicit 01:25, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Birum[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify based on comments by Madame Necker. Giant Snowman 08:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have identified multiple print newspaper articles about the footballer, which do not seem to be digitalized. I'm travelling New Guinea next month and will share the sources. @GiantSnowman:.--Madame Necker (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per comment above and because article isn't suitable for mainspace currently. Going to WP:AGF here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify per Spiderone. Andre🚐 18:08, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eric George (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 08:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rohan George[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NFOOTY doesn't protect these anymore, so you have to provide the sort of coverage we need. I don't see it. Profiles on sports sites (even ESPN and FoxNews) isn't enough. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephon Hood[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Charles (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Josh Charles (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Åsa Persson (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Fletcher (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carina Håkansson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anette Nicklasson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is evidence Anette Nicklasson represented Sweden at according to the Daily Telegraph [1][2]. Dwanyewest (talk) 19:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources listed above are a clear fails of WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teresa Morató[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC. Sources are inaccessible, trivial or not independent. Avilich (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 20:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources found. Marca is reputable and it's a lengthy article/interview; the AS 'debut' piece and El Periodic article also good. Enough for me. Giant Snowman 16:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Did the nominator do WP:BEFORE, and if so can they explain what are wrong with the pages of sources that Google News shows, such as https://www.marca.com/futbol/futbol-femenino/primera-division/2021/03/18/6050f259ca4741d2758b4577.html and https://www.unionrayo.es/teresa-morato-sera-la-primera-futbolista-andorrana-en-jugar-en-la-maxima-categoria-del-futbol-femenino/? This looks like far more than routine match reports. pburka (talk) 21:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The first is a collection of direct quotations, the second merely says that she moved from a second division team to one from the first. Avilich (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per Pburka. @GiantSnowman:, Besides the sources found above, I found (searching up Tere Morató as opposed to Teresa Morató) 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 among many many other sources from Andorran, Spanish, and Catalan portals. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran football, probably the best ever Andorran women's player, and plays in the Spanish top flight, which is regarded as one of the world's best leagues and one of a few fully pro leagues worldwide. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:59, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources by Pburka and Das osmnezz passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:40, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - GNG pass per AS and El Periodic Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Frederick[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can only find stat pages like Soccerway, Transfermarkt, Fbref none of which are any good in terms of GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erika Da Cunha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Catia Da Silva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paula da Silva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iria Domínguez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ainhoa Fernández[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources below which demonstrate notability. Giant Snowman 08:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Andorra, and Spain. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman: I found [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7] among many many other sources from diariandorra.ad, elperiodic.ad, etc. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran women's and international football. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources by Das osmnezz passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Fernández[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources below which demonstrate notability. Giant Snowman 08:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], and [14] among many many other sources from faf.ad, elperiodic.ad, andorradifusio.adm diariandorra.ad, elprincipat.com, etc. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran football. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:26, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - fantastic coverage in Futfem and Diari d'Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Less Unless (talk) 05:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Bubb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - 14 games in a fully professional league. Usual revisionist nonsense Zanoni (talk) 10:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm going to IAR and use COMMONSENSE - international player, professional player, with a sizeable number of appearances (i.e. not just a one off). 400,000 results on Google. Reliable sources will be out there. Giant Snowman 19:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per GiantSnowman and @Zanoni:. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clear GNG pass. At this point I'm questioning if this nominator even read the articles before mass nominating, let alone doing WP:BEFORE. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am questioning if you even understand what GNG is. Can you please point out the sources that meet GNG? Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Once again the corpse of N:FOOTBALL rears it's ugly head. On the field stuff doesn't matter. He fails GNG due to a lack of significant coverage. Dougal18 (talk) 14:00, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lluna Gallego[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lia Gil[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ariana Gonçalves[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bibiana Gonçalves[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Èrica Gonçalves[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kwan Baptiste[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Míriam Iban[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - best source I can find is El Periodic which is way short of the mark Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Franklyn Baptiste[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irina Grigorieva (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Russia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. There will likely be Russian language sources, but we don't have any. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rawan Abdelmoneim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 22:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Africa. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edith Nari[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd second your point about this article's deletion. Not only is the article an insufficient stub that, insofar as I can see, would be impossible to justify expanding under most circumstances, I have not found a single substantial source, nor do there appear to be any notable characteristics for this individual in question. Whether or not the page was created with the expectation that such professionals automatically deserved a page is a good question, to which - per Wikipedia's guidelines - I'd answer in the negative. I agree that this page should be deleted as well - all research points to that conclusion! ...Anyone else? TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Oceania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laydah Samani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources added which demonstrate notability (just!). Giant Snowman 08:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Oceania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've added sources, including an extensive article from Stuff [15]. I'd also note that she seems to be one of the Solomon Islands' more notable players and is currently an OFC women's football ambassador. All of this was easily found with a simple google search, and I am again surprised the nominator didn't do one before jumping straight to deletion. I'd also like to draw people's attention to the comment from the closer on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okilani Tinilau (2nd nomination): "As a project, we must have some sensitivity to the fact that there will be subjects from minority groups in smaller countries for whom sources in English will be sparse or less accessible than for subjects in large English-speaking countries." This seems to be exactly such a case where we need to be careful about deletion.--IdiotSavant (talk) 03:10, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Additional sources indicate a clear GNG pass. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per sources in article (@GiantSnowman:). She is clearly significant figure in Solomon Islands women's and international football, probably best Solomon Islands women's player ever, and one of few to ever play abroad. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above scrapes though WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources now in article are sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Jacona (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Serah Ragomo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Oceania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Margot Llobera[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:SPORTCRIT. Avilich (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GiantSnowman: Check below. MSport1005 (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources below which show notability. Giant Snowman 17:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Motorsport, and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Doesn't meet the SNG let alone the GNG. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 02:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Struck in consideration of new !votes. 00:56, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep – This article should focus more on her rallying than her footballing, but coverage is more than extense in both Andorran and Spanish newspapers. [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44] all work towards establishing WP:SIGCOV. She was also the youngest rider at the 2020 Dakar Rally and part of the first ever all-female Dakar lineup in 2022—if that's not notable in itself, then at least there's decent WP:POTENTIAL for WP:NSPORT. Either way, GNG is comfortably met so this is a clear keep for me. MSport1005 (talk) 17:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly passes GNG with ABC in particular being very good. Mundo Deportivo has a piece on her and her sister and uncle. There is a very long interview piece in El Correo. A video in Andorra Di Fusio Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per everything above. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran sports. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 21:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes GNG. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources by MSport1005 passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clear Keep. Passes WP:GNG, passes WP:NSPORT with the plethora of sources above. Jacona (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alba López[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zoe Montero[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSPORT, WP:BASIC. Avilich (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman: I found [45] and [46] among many many other sources. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran women's and international football. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Two interviews that appear routine is not enough. Giant Snowman 08:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clear fail of WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree that the Q&A articles are insufficient for notability Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Moles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per sources below which show notability. Giant Snowman 16:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], and [53], among many many other sources. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran women's and international football. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly passes GNG. It is plainly evident that the nominator did not do WP:BEFORE in any sense before embarking on this mass-nomination spree. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:04, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources by Das osmnezz passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:05, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Maria Nieto[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beatriz Moreno[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laia Pérez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Samantha Reyes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniela Rodrigues[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Ruzafa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - some of the sources below are routine transfer news, but the El Periodic and Ara pieces in particular are lengthy. Enough for me. Giant Snowman 16:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman:, I found [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], and [61], among many many other sources from elprincipat.com, andorradifusio.ad, diariandorra.ad, elperiodic.ad, bondia.ad, ara.ad, etc . She is clearly significant figure in Andorran women's and international football, one of the best ever Andorran women's player, and first to play outside of Spain. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 16:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Obviously notable and a clear failure to do WP:BEFORE. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:03, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Marta San Juan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:27, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tània Sánchez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andreina Silva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman: I found [62] and [63] among many many other sources. She is clearly significant figure in Andorran women's and international football. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I finish writing this, another 30 will probably be deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 01:11, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Both look to be brief, routine interviews, and I'm not sure they demonstrate notability. Giant Snowman 08:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV, sources identified above are trivial. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only sources proffered are basic interviews with no independent content. I did a search myself and couldn't find any significant, detailed coverage about this footballer Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Found no evidence of independent secondary significant coverage to meet any notability standard. Jacona (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Two or more in-depth, high-quality sources are what is needed and I find none. Does not meet WP:BASIC. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laia Sin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laia Solé[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delia Falconer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost completely self referential. BEFORE reveals mostly self published and her own website referencing her. Searching her books doesn't reveal much either in the way of sourcing for a BLP. FrederalBacon (talk) 22:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Women. FrederalBacon (talk) 22:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 13:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems notable enough to me: hundreds of hits in ProQuest, also for example in the Sydney Morning Herald; she's had book reviews in the Los Angeles Times and New York Times Piecesofuk (talk) 15:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I agree, her books are well received. Also, the SMH link doesn't work, if you can get that working and there's enough there, I'll build it out an withdraw this myself. But there is a significant lack of coverage about her that is third party. Her books may warrant inclusion, but coverage about her life to build a BLP off of doesn't really exist. And everything currently on the page is self referenced (IE, The reference for the information that she wrote a book is a link to her publisher with the news release). FrederalBacon (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the SMH link, I typed site:www.smh.com.au Delia Falconer into the google search box. If you have access to ProQuest then there are quite a few earlier (c. 1997) hits from the SMH and other Australian newspapers, you can access via the Wikipedia Library, I think this link should work https://wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?auth=production&url=https://search.proquest.com/ip Piecesofuk (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Going through the Wiki library, I see a lot of book reviews, articles by her, and little blurbs about her doing lectures, like press releases. If you see anything in there that would fit in a BLP, feel free, but I'm still not seeing SIGCOV in there; I will keep looking, but I did a pretty thorough BEFORE for her, since she is an author with well received books, I figured there would be coverage. FrederalBacon (talk) 18:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The only other things I can find are short bios (or praise) in anthologies like https://archive.org/details/daughtersfathers0000unse_z4g5/page/150/mode/1up, https://archive.org/details/bestaustralianst0000unse/page/289/mode/1up and https://archive.org/details/isbn_9781863953535/page/n18/mode/1up?q=%22Delia+Falconer%22 Piecesofuk (talk) 18:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another one from The Literature of Australia - an Anthology https://archive.org/details/literatureofaust0000unse/page/1384/mode/1up Piecesofuk (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per WP:AUTHOR#3, and the multiple reviews of her works, e.g. Signs and Wonders (Sydney Review of Books, also discussing her other works, including Sydney and The Service of Clouds), The Service of Clouds (Kirkus Reviews), The Service of Clouds (Publishers Weekly, via Gale), The Service of Clouds (Library Journal, via Gale), The Service of Clouds (Artforum International, via Gale), McNamer, D.. The Service of Clouds, In: NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW. 103(19):34-34 (record only), By: Linfield, Susie. The Service of Clouds, In: Los Angeles Times. April 29, 1998, p5.; Los Angeles Times, 1998. (record only), "The bumpkin calculus of Time" Reviewed Work: Sydney by Delia Falconer (Antipodes, via JSTOR), Benteen and the ghosts of his last stand (The Age, via Gale (review of The Lost Thoughts of Soldiers), Looking at the spaces between the story (The Sun-Herald, via Gale, review of The Lost Thoughts of Soldiers), Love and Vertigo: The Blue Mountains as Veranda in Australian Women's Writing (Antipodes, via JSTOR, includes discussion of her poetry), New Writing (The Age, discusses her winning an award, via Gale). She also has a profile in Gale Literature: Contemporary Authors and a brief profile in The Writers Directory (via Gale). This is only a review of an initial online search and the first page of results at the WP Library. I have not yet reviewed ProQuest, but there appear to be plenty of sources available to help develop this article about her and her career. Beccaynr (talk) 18:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Via Proquest, there is interview-based coverage with secondary context and commentary that helps support her WP:BASIC notability, in addition to her WP:AUTHOR notability that permits a BLP to be developed about her and her career, e.g. JANE, F. (1997, Oct 25). SKY WRITER; PRO FILE * DELIA FALCONER / AUTHOR: [LATE EDITION]. Sydney Morning Herald, Retrieved from, Greenwood, H. (2010, Oct 02). Delia Falconer: Interview. Sydney Morning Herald, Retrieved from. LAT and NYT reviews are available, and there are additional reviews for Signs and Wonders, e.g. Distilling the signs of the times. (2021, Oct 16). Weekend Australian, Retrieved from, and Addressing the mess and beauty we've made. (2021, Oct 16). Sydney Morning Herald, Retrieved from. Beccaynr (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:NAUTHOR based on the excellent research by Beccaynr and Piecesofuk and the multiple reviews of her work found in reliable sources such as the LA Times, NY Times and others. The article sourcing needs to be improved, but that is not a reason for deletion since it is clear that sources exist. Netherzone (talk) 19:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Míriam Tizón[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:NSPORT. Avilich (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Avilich (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Andorra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero search results that even resemble SIGCOV. It's quite remarkable that an entirely new delsort for a tiny European country was needed for these 29 AfDs on footballers. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Townsend[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks to me that this article fails WP:MUSICBIO. Popcornfud (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Popcornfud (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of books about manuscripts[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of fiction books about manuscripts. fails WP:LISTN, not discussed as a seperate class—it's a rather set index type of list, but not a very relevant or encyclopedic one. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 21:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only one is linked to their own Wikipedia article, so not a valid list article. Category:Manuscripts exist but I don't see anything that would populate this list. Dream Focus 23:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An obvious failure of WP:LISTN as the topic of "fictional books about manuscripts" is not a topic that actually has any coverage in reliable sources. Rorshacma (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Faile WP:LISTN Lightburst (talk) 02:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Books are about everything. There is no need for separate lists about each of them. desmay (talk) 05:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Listcruft and fails WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 21:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:LISTN. NavjotSR (talk) 09:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:LISTN, can't think of any reason to save this article. Jacona (talk) 18:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of minor Blandings characters[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These characters do not have significant coverage in reliable third party sources to meet WP:SIGCOV. Sources show passing mentions or less, with no meaningful coverage to reach notability. Tried to remove this content through the WP:PROD process but was reverted without any substantial effort to address the issues. Jontesta (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is an indiscriminate list of over one hundred fictional characters that make any sort of appearance no matter how small. Obviously not a topic that is going to have significant coverage. ––FormalDude talk 00:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The characters that have any importance, as well as a number of the minor characters that appear in this list, are already described in prose format at Blandings Castle#Residents and guests. The major character and numerous minor characters are listed with appropriately succinct descriptions at List of P. G. Wodehouse characters#Blandings Castle. We don't need a third page covering the same topic, particularly as this one is just made up of overly-extensive, in-universe plot information. Rorshacma (talk) 01:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of P. G. Wodehouse characters. Effectively unreferenced, all plot summary WP:FANCRUFT. @Jontesta: We probably should discuss most of entries at Template:Lists of P. G. Wodehouse characters...

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Random lists of "minor" characters are inherently non-notable. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 19:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is NOT a collection of trivia. Jacona (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 01:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Alexander (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In trying to substantiate the article's claim that he was born in Watford, I discovered that I could find absolutely no significant coverage about him. I checked all the usual Google suspects, as well as WMF Library, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, and Newspapers.com and found nothing, even when adding specific terms like "Watford" or "Touch of Frost". ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and England. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:31, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the actor has notability for having a main role in A Touch of Frost as well as other TV and films plus radio (and probably theatre). Also an associate teacher at RADA. That's quite a career.188.39.237.234 (talk) 08:27, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable TV and stage actor: see BFI credits list https://www2.bfi.org.uk/films-tv-people/4ce2ba9d31ddb and Theatricalia credits list https://theatricalia.com/person/5b6/bruce-alexander Piecesofuk (talk) 14:16, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding both this and the IP's arguments, credits alone are insufficient to establish notability; what's important is that someone has written about the subject in reliable sources. I would be happy to withdraw the AfD if someone finds significant coverage, but in the absence of any, we can't retain the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are plenty of reviews of his work in The Stage https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/search/results?basicsearch=%22bruce%20alexander%22%20%20&phrasesearch=bruce%20alexander&retrievecountrycounts=false&newspapertitle=the%2bstage Piecesofuk (talk) 06:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Aside from the fact he played a long running major role in a very successful TV series, there does seem to be coverage of his wider career on the internet including his work at RADA. Dunarc (talk) 22:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There isn't enough third party coverage about this topic and it does not meet the definition of WP:SIGCOV. A few trivial mentions at best, and certainly not enough to support a stand-alone article. Jontesta (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to existing coverage, it is covered in two scholarly works (Ott, Brian L. "‘Oh My God, They Digitized Kenny!." Prime Time Animation: Television (2013).) here, and (Jones, Mark. "Tentacles and Teeth: The Lovecraftian Being in Popular Culture." In New Critical Essays on HP Lovecraft, pp. 227-247. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2013.) here. It's a pretty niche thing, but clearly exists, and received appropriate critical commentary. Merging to either South Park or Babylon 5 article space would be problematic, as we would have to decide which element of the crossover was primary. Jclemens (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Also, I'll note that actual parks named "Babylon Park" unrelated to either South Park or Babylon 5 clearly exist, and make searching for coverage more difficult) Jclemens (talk) 16:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The coverage by secondary sources which exist in the article and those listed by Jclemens, as well as a few more sources may not be very long, but is not trivial and enough to support a short, non-stubby article. Daranios (talk) 19:52, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the coverage found by Jclemens as well as their overall argument. Aoba47 (talk) 03:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of DC Comics characters: G. ✗plicit 01:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Gambi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delsorted to fashion because the guy is a tailor. There is not enough external coverage for this character to meet WP:GNG unless you count appearances in listicles like this (appearing in last place for the record).

A redirect to the more notable Peter Gambi might be acceptable, but that should only be done if there is consensus that there shouldn't be an article for this topic. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion and Comics and animation. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge with List of DC Comics characters: G in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 01:11, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with List of DC Comics characters: G - I found no evidence that the subject meets WP:GNG. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Asaiso Gossie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 21:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. Avilich (talk) 22:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:01, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Gani[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:10, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:00, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 21:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. Avilich (talk) 02:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The War Zone (magazine)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. The article's references are either primary sources or passing mentions, in the style of "first reported by The War Zone" with a link to the related article. A WP:BEFORE doesn't bring anything more than that. BilletsMauves^€500 15:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 21:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in absence of source demonstrating WP:GNG and/or WP:WEBCRIT is met. Existing sourcing is non-independent, passing mentions, or a press release. None come even close to meeting GNG, let alone there being the multiple such sources required. A brief search online reveals no further sourcing to remedy the situation. -Ljleppan (talk) 07:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Lower Salmon Falls Dam. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lower Salmon Falls[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability, during my BEFORE I didn't find any notability indicated in reliable sources. It appears most references to it are in environmental studies and tourism sites. Even appears to fail WP:GEOLAND. FrederalBacon (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. FrederalBacon (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Lower Salmon Falls Dam. Djflem (talk) 21:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GEOLAND, which says The number of known sources should be considered to ensure there is enough verifiable content for an encyclopedic article. If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. Merge is not an AfD outcome and should be proposed seperately, although if a closing admin chose to do a bold merge, that would be acceptable - there is not much mergeable content here. The question for AfD is whether there is enough here to establish notability for an encyclopaedic article. The answer to that is no. An acceptable alternative outcome in this case would be Redirect to Lower Salmon Falls Dam which would also preserve the edit history should anyone wish to use the page history to add information to the other article. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Kowalczyk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO Maister1921 (talk) 20:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Poland. Maister1921 (talk) 20:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Pl wiki lists a few more medals, but they are all team medals, and coverage for him as an individual is pretty limited. Fails WP:NBIO IMHO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice against restoring-and-merging if an editor wishes to contend that this content merits mention in 2022 World Singles Ninepin Bowling Classic Championships. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:14, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 World Ninepin Bowling Classic U18 Cup[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTDATABASE and fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Estonia. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep well, there was coverage [64] [65]. Maybe the article creator has sources in some other language. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The first source is a clear fails of WP:100WORDS. Most of the second article talks about the sport of bowling instead of the tournament. In any case having one source is a clear fails of WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:48, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The subject is far too narrow for anything other than sorta a stats dump. SWinxy (talk) 03:20, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more relist in hopes of reaching a consensus of some kind.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 19:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Topic not notable enough for the article to contain more than unencyclopedic data tables. Avilich (talk) 22:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Sportsfan 1234: re WP:100WORDS. There's a reason that essay is not accepted into guidelines and why it is a poor argument at AFD. This text;
Isaac Newton formulated the laws of motion and universal gravitation. He built the first practical reflecting telescope. Newton was a fellow of Trinity College and Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at the University of Cambridge. Other posts included Member of Parliament for the University of Cambridge, Master of the Royal Mint, and president of the Royal Society. He was knighted by Queen Anne.
is well under 100 words. Yet it makes nine significant claims to notability; some of them highly significant world changing acts. Even cutting it down to 30 words would still leave something very substantial. SpinningSpark 13:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with 2022 World Singles Ninepin Bowling Classic Championships. SpinningSpark 13:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erminio Confortola[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable skier, doesn't meet WP:GNG enough for standalone article. If not deleted, a redirect to Military patrol at the 1928 Winter Olympics as an alternative to deletion would make sense, but a WP:BEFORE search returns very little, and no third party coverage to satisfy GNG. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 20:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A redirect would be possible too, but I don't really see the point, seeing how the article was viewed only once in the past 30 days. BilletsMauves^€500 21:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My searches also failed to turn up any SIGCOV. (On the plus side, I learned something new today, that "military patrol" was once an Olympic event!) Cbl62 (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would also be fine with a redirect as there have been 626 views in the past seven years. Cbl62 (talk) 22:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrzej Chrobák[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ski mountaineer. WP:BEFORE search brought up very few results, and no third party coverage to establish notability. Doesn't meet WP:GNG SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 20:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No pl wiki article, my BEFORE actally found zero reliable results. Given this, I am actually calling this a WP:HOAX, although the nom wrote they found something (ery few results?).

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to Piotrus, when I did my search, I found something that mentioned the subject name on Peoplepill, which really isn't a reliable source whatsoever, so it kind of leads me to believe that you're correct, that it may be a hoax. I should have noted this a little better when I started this discussion, that's my bad! Thanks though for doing another search and bringing this to my attention! SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 12:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Spf121188 I looked at some other articles by the creator, for some I couldn't locate sources, but for some I did find something. It's hard to say if they were just using some very obscure sources (possibly offline?) or if they were mixing truth and fiction. Fortunately, notability doesn't care either way, and is grounds of removing much of their contributions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jakub Brzosko[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable athlete. WP:BEFORE search doesn't bring up any third party sources to establish notability. Also, no medal record. Don't think this comes close to meeting WP:GNG. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 17:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Poland. Shellwood (talk) 17:46, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Query for "Jakub Brzosko" 1978 -wikipedia yields nothing, likely hoax, although a few facts do appear in [66]. So perhaps it's just a case of very low impact. Fails WP:NSPORT, WP:NBIO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Ponyo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) per G5. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nandhagopan V[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

complete and total spam that is largely unsourced (because sources for the statements here don't exist) about a non-notable musician and created by an obvious sock. Also worth noting that if we removed all the unsourced nonsense here, not even just the spam, we'd be left with a blank page because there are no sources that support a single statement here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per nomination. Obvious spam. Should have been a PROD IMO. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 17:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, India, and Kerala. Shellwood (talk) 17:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CU note Confirmed socking: sock creates the draft, master moves it to article space. This should have been an easy CSD, but here we are.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete under both G11 and G5. -- ferret (talk) 17:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The G11 tagging was declined and it is not eligible for a G5 as it was not creating by a ban evading editor (both the sockmaster and sockpuppet were just blocked today). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was created as a block evasion, see the original blocked sock per Ferret. Nandhu41095 was created to aggressively promote this person, the second account who created it was in violation of said block, and apparently had a sleeper to do their work for them. And we're all aware the G11 was declined, that's why we're having this pointless discussion, since I think most of us can agree it is unambiguously promotional. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's G5. It's a verbatim copy of the draft by Nandhu41095 (the older previously blocked account from 2021). -- ferret (talk) 18:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Agree with both Liz and PRAXIDICAE🌈 for the reasoning here.--IndyNotes (talk) 18:52, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom and Ponyo. Imperfect Boy (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural note: I wasn't aware of the blocked Nandhu41095 account, which puts this squarely in G5 territory; I've speedy deleted it accordingly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gattiek Wichar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Press secretary for South Sudan's Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation, he's 25 years old. No significant coverage. There is one routine item on him being appointed. Other few items have him quoted for a sentence or two on behalf of the ministry. Mvqr (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Journalism, and Africa. Mvqr (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. This feels like it might be too soon for a standalone article, due to only passing mentions. Not enough to satisfy WP:GNG. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 19:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the coverage provided contains enough detail to establish notability. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 00:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandro Salsano[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:SIGCOV. References are PR, profiles and interviews, or/and company information, passing mentions. No real secondary sourcing. scope_creep^Talk 16:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 16:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I find the piece in Forbes Central America, rest are press releases. Nothing notable. Might be more in Spanish sources? Oaktree b (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While we have a Forbes Central America article, my best efforts do not show him listed on the 2019 Forbes list. If other sources are discovered, feel free to ping me. Otherwise, fails WP:GNG. Slywriter (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet notability. Was clearly created by the subject and manicured to circumvent getting deleted all these years. Nswix (talk) 21:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject was the source of reference to own wealth in Spanish language article protected by an army of sockpuppet accounts, but there just isn't one reliable cite to anything he has ever done, owned, sold, or given away. basically it fails WP:GNG Contribuine34 (talk) 21:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He was actually on the cover of Forbes Centroamérica for that article, but all else I can find about him in RS is passing mentions. Storchy (talk) 06:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the claims around Forbes 2019 couldn't be substantiated and there is a lack of WP:SIGCOV meaning it does not pass WP:NBIO or WP:GNG. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 08:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom, fails WP:SIGCOV. Shaniquagreen (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vijayarajamallika[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Non notable poet. The awards won by the subject are also not notable. Fails WP:POET. The references are not reliable. Imperfect Boy (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)~~ Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 02:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, India, and Kerala. Imperfect Boy (talk) 15:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has significant coverage: [67][68][69][70]. --Mvqr (talk) 17:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets gng per [71], [72]. DavidEfraim (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets GNG as demonstrated by Mvqr and DE above. pburka (talk) 13:37, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per coverage above by Mvqr and DavidEfraim above passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 16:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

War of Rights[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline, as there is only one significant reliable source available online (Game Rant, which isn't high-quality). Metacritic shows zero reviews for the game. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 15:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a Vice article that counts toward notability. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 17:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 15:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets W:GNG: the subject has independent and sufficient coverage in several languages ([73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83]) --NoonIcarus (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @NoonIcarus: Thanks for these links. I apologize for missing the Vice article—fascinatingly, I can't get it to show up on Google until I append the word "Vice" to the query.
- Vice clearly counts towards notability. It's a high-quality source with significant coverage. In addition, although it's not a high-quality source Game Rant likely counts as well. However, while Eurogamer is reliable, a three-paragraph update isn't significant coverage. I'm also not sure that any of the other sources count as reliable, particularly as they don't appear on VG/RS. Can you give more info on how they satisfy WP:RS?
Keep: Plenty of sources, as shown by NoonIcarus above. Also, WP:VG/RS says [about] Game Rant ~~is only unreliable for BLPs~~: "Topics of low potential for controversy such as general pop culture topics or game information are allowable areas." 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 17:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ficaia: You've left out a pretty important part of that sentence. Game Rant isn't a high-quality source per VG/RS because that says "Consensus is that it is not a high quality source, to be treated with caution and excluded from BLP pages." (emphasis mine) Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 17:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there's also articles in MEL Magazine [84] and TechRaptor[85] that haven't been mentioned yet above.--Jahaza (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment These interviews can buff out the article (although they don't contribute to the article's notability). This article is also quite good.Coin945 (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Techraptor is considered an unreliable source by WPVG. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify WP:TOOSOON with insufficient reliable sources (as opposed to unreliable sources, which there are a lot of). 1.0 release may result in more reviews. Either way, the current state of it isn't ready for mainspace. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:15, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep thanks to sources from NoonIcarus. Vice and Eurogamer are good sources among others, and are sufficient with what the article has. Archrogue (talk) 14:08, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you are referring to this source, it is purely a news update, not WP:SIGCOV in the slightest, which was mentioned earlier in the discussion, ignoring that fact and proceeding as though it was is disingenuous. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:05, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman#To Eliminate the Opiate. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To Eliminate The Opiate (book)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. Can't see anything to establish it; all the google hits are, apart from Amazon, booksellers TheLongTone (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nota also that there is a Wikipedia article on the author of this book, created by the author of this article, which has been tagged as possibly about a non-notable subject.TheLongTone (talk) 14:54, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman#To Eliminate the Opiate or delete. I couldn't find much more than occasional mentions in conspiracy-minded unreliable sources—there's none of the in-depth RS coverage needed to satisfy WP:NBOOK or the GNG. I'm not sure Antelman is notable either, but as long as his article is there redirecting as an alternative to deletion is probably harmless (though I'm not averse to deleting outright). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability has been much improved now, and has been tagged "in progress" as well Nissimnanach (talk) 17:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Nissimnanach[reply]
Redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman#To Eliminate the Opiate - The sourcing in the article does not have any reliable sources that contribute to establishing notability, nor can I find any. -- Whpq (talk) 02:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Marvin Stuart Antelman#To Eliminate the Opiate. The current refs fail WP:GNG nor WP:NBOOK, relying upon a bundle of SPS, including YouTube, Reddit, threads, and other forums. Given the lack of any RS, there's nothing worth preserving by merging, but WP:ATD also suggests redirecting is better than deleting, IMO. I could go with draftify as well, perhaps, as the article is newly created, but I don't feel the topic is even notable enough. Many thanks! VickKiang (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Redirect I'm fine with either per above. Deletion is unnecessary. Buffs (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What policy or guideline does this meet that justifies a keep? Whpq (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bangladeshis by net worth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written and poorly sourced article. That does not have any encyclopedic value apart from promoting the businessmen mentioned in it. Complete original research. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and Bangladesh. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but not quite per nom: @Vinegarymass911, your nomination is poorly worded: Neither a "poorly written" nor a "poorly sourced" article are reasons for deletion (see WP:ARTN). Likewise, original research is bad, but if it is a problem of an article, which would otherwise meet WP:GNG, then it's not a reason for deletion either! If it could be fixed, by you or me, then it should not be deleted. So in the future, please make sure your terminology/reasoning is correct, or you risk the nomination getting kept per "invalid nom". That being said, this list should actually be deleted, because it does not satisfy WP:NOTESAL. Instead, I have found this article which discusses a total lack of Bangladeshi billionaires – a crass contradiction to the article content and cited sources. So delete, but for other reasons than in the nom ^^ --LordPeterII (talk) 18:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not per per nomination, but because it fails WP:SIGCOV. Shaniquagreen (talk) 15:44, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Republican in Name Only. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:03, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vichy Republican[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be an almost unused political neologism. Total citations are two blogs. A WP:BEFORE shows passing uses in RSes in opinion columns, but no currency, and no evidence the term ever took off; doesn't meet WP:NSUSTAINED. David Gerard (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. David Gerard (talk) 12:55, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per OP. Certainly no establishment of notability. Could have probably been PROD'd. — Czello 13:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- It was and declined - David Gerard (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Republican in Name Only's similar terms section. It's been used fairly widely in a variety of RS. It has a full article in the The Jerusalem Post. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 14:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or merge?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:14, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: Agree with ‡ El cid, el campeador's reasoning. --IndyNotes (talk) 18:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. A merge can still be discussed outside of AfD Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Raster graphics editor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources. Fails GNG DavidEfraim (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. DavidEfraim (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. Adobe Photoshop and GIMP are raster graphics editors. Obvious notability, and many reliable sources [86][87][88][89] See also: Comparison of raster graphics editors which has a list of notable editors. --Mvqr (talk) 13:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The sources Mvqr provided show notability, and this is a topic that more than meets WP:GNG and has a plethora of notable topics that fall within the umbrella of its description (not that this shows notability, but it does show how likely sources are). Because specific examples of raster graphics editors (Adobe Photoshop and GIMP are the two main culprits) do tend to clog up the search results it may be more difficult to find sources that discuss the concept itself, but they do exist.[90][91] - Aoidh (talk) 17:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, with Raster_graphics#Raster-based_image_editors. Sure, the subject is notable but what is there to say about it that can't be done in a few lines? SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 19:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Discussed as a general topic (ie, without reference to a particular editor) in numerous sources. By the way (and totally off topic) calling bitmap graphics raster is etymologically absurd. The term raster in electronic imaging was originally applied to scanned-line analogue television. A bitmap image is a grid, not a rake (Latin rāstrum). SpinningSpark 13:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Glass Harp (band). ✗plicit 13:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Sferra[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violation of BLP. No significant coverage DavidEfraim (talk) 12:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. DavidEfraim (talk) 12:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Glass Harp (band). I am seeing quite a few -mentions- but no in-depth coverage in RS. Does not pass GNG in my view. ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 13:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Glass Harp (band). See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Pecchio. Not everyone in the band needs to have his own article. Sferra's work with Glass Harp has received the most coverage, but within the context of the band. His works outside of that band and its side projects are not notable. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Glass Harp (band). agree with all above. All content came from the air. No citations for anything. Zeddedm (talk) 08:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Vilana Díaz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ski mountaineer. WP:BEFORE search doesn't bring up any third party sources to establish notability. No medal record, doesn't pass WP:GNG. SPF121188 ^{(talk this way)} ^(contribs) 12:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Active Entertainment Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extent of notability unclear. Small, defunct distributing company. Very little material online covering it. Mooonswimmer 12:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. Shellwood (talk) 12:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:03, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

U. R. Lalit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The son of the subject is slated to become the next CJI of the Supreme Court of India. However, there are no independent media reports to substantiate notability. Done a WP:BEFORE and found mentions of subject's name in articles about his son. VV 08:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and India. VV 08:13, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Yes, there are only mentions of his names, nothing in depth. Ratekreel (talk) 13:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete. I have additional information from reputed journals to substantiate its notability. Mohit Singh (talk) 19:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I had a look at the references and none of them constitute WP:SIGCOV either individually or together. They make some passing references that the subject is the father of the next CJI. VV 07:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Passing mentions, nothing suitable for our purposes. Oaktree b (talk) 17:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to MOR Entertainment. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃 _{(ICE-T • ICE CUBE)} 11:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYMC-FM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Station fails WP:BCAST and WP:GNG. Only one source was mentioned about the closure. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looking through the archived source of the article, it is only about DJ Chacha and it has the information of the Wikipedia text as of August 24, 2020.
Delete Usually I'd say a redirect to MOR Entertainment, but that article itself is a WP:FANCRUFT piece deserving of dam-destroying dynamite. This station's history is merely as a network repeater. Nate • (chatter) 21:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to MOR Entertainment, do not delete. Fails WP:BCAST and WP:GNG per nom. There WP:MUSTBESOURCES about the defunct station in local media, but may be hard to find. SBKSPP (talk) 01:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amar Jit Singh Sandhu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Awarded two mid-level awards. If WP:NSOLDIER had not been deprecated has being too vague, would not even meet that. Not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources. And since the verbiage from the two citations are not referenced, there might be COI issue as well. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nomination C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 15:31, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Have made several changes to improve the quality of article. Dvj1992 (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A significant amount of text appears to have been copied from bharat-rakshak.com, and then inserted into the article under "quotation marks" to forestall any copyright flags. Spintendo 20:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The copied text is citiation of award. The general practise is to quote the cition of award so that it is know that what is the act of bravery for which a person has received a award. The format of the citied text has beeen changed. Dvj1992 (talk) 12:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Does not satisfy general notability. There is also a draft, which can be left alone. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please feel free to change the category from General Notability to someother as you seem fit. He individual played a significant role in the 1965 war and was highly regarded by both sides. will be adding more information. Please delete the draft. Regards Dvj1992 (talk) 12:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are very few individuals n this entire who can claim to have shot down an aircraft. This article has a lot of potential for improvement. Could be a significant article on Wikipedia. Dvj1992 (talk) 10:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete does not meet WP:GNG. Fails WP:MILPERSON Imperfect Boy (talk) 04:03, 25 August 2022 (UTC) Blocked sock. Beccaynr (talk) 02:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imperfect Boy is a suspected sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix man. 2409:4073:38C:A250:0:0:BC2:40AD (talk) 05:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:BASIC, claimed notability is based on a single air-to-air kill, 4 sources are essentially the same (Bharat Rakshak). Mztourist (talk) 05:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Viva (Israeli TV channel)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage to the company. Fails GNG DavidEfraim (talk) 11:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Companies. DavidEfraim (talk) 11:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Beast (soundtrack). ✗plicit 13:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jolly O Gymkhana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can easily be merged with Beast (soundtrack). Kailash29792 (talk) 11:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and India. Shellwood (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Beast (soundtrack) per WP:NSONG as there's "not enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." Even the content that's present can be cut down drastically by removing needless promotional info. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: This looks like a waste of time. Why did you even start this AfD? Just because a narcissistic sock wants to retain this as stand-alone article? There is no need to park this article for another 7 days. Just restore the redirect, withdraw this AfD and close this AfD you started. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 18:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Need to transfer the content properly. That is why. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOTBURO. It isn't necessary for you to initiate an AfD before merging content. Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't know why this was nominated or suggested to merge. There are many articles about the song that would mean it meets notability. 1, 2, and many others. Jupiteralien (talk) 21:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources simply say that the song was released. There is no indication why it is notable. Richard3120 (talk) 12:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or delete per discussion above. ArvindPalaskar (talk) 07:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or delete Unnecessary AfD. NavjotSR (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was (non-admin closure) Bad faith nomination. WP:NOTCENSORED. Malformed AfD. — Czello 11:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna and Radha in a Pavilion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disrespect towards Hindu community. Radha was not married to Bhagwan Krishna. She was a devotee according to Vaishnav Shastra ex. Shrimad Bhagwat. Shree Krishna is the most respected avatar in history. He should be revered not abused. Such painting are painted by enemies of Hinduism who may have Hindu names but were not Hindus from heart and are those who had vested interests. Any book/media which promotes such picture either do not understand Hinduism/Hindu sentiments or purposefully against it. Wikipedia should take a ground on whether they should be neutral towards everybody and remove every article which demeans some religion (ie. Hinduism) or declare itself as a platform of hate towards Hindus. Later choice will have serious repercussions. Wikipedia might be banned in India if things like this come out open. Already many such internet products (ex. Amazon in recent time, even Bollywood films like LSC) are banned after twitter boycott. So, it's not gonna be different for wikipedia. For example Islamic countries would have banned WP if any picture of Muhammad was shown here even though hundreds of such pictures are available. India is also a religious country. Religion has serious impact on government decisions. So, admins delete it if you don't want more controversy. ShresthaShome.Ullas (talk) 10:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as a notable painting and Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED. We also have an article on depictions of Muhammed. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 11:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Depections of Muhammad are not vulgar. They are not in sexual positions. Those depictions are Historic (ie. in war or treaty). Here the depiction has no valid reason. ie. no shastra suggest that Krishna and Radha had sex. By the way, the painting itself has no reason to exist other than being used to normalize such depiction. And wikipedia will sensor notable Russian propaganda if they are against Ukraine or USA. Or Nazi propaganda against allies. No party is truly uncensored. And it's not even practical to not censor everything. Also, notability in a single book is not really notability. Cultural sensitivity and differences must be acknowledge. The publisher of the book may not care about it but wikipedia must care since it is viewed by everyone. Stop viewing everything with your lens.
ShresthaShome.Ullas (talk) 11:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No valid grounds for removing the article. WP:NOTCENSORED. Kleuske (talk) 11:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 13:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bigg Boss (Marathi TV series) controversies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Collection of trivial non-encyclopedic events in line with our essay of WP:CSECTION. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, Mostly contains a bunch of non-notable events related to the show. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The argument that this subject is notable as a term, movement, or concept, is persuasive, and is backed by sources. If there is poorly sourced content claiming it to be a well-defined organization, that requires removal, but not usually deletion of the article. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Towhidi Muslim Janata[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no party, organization, or association exist called Tawhidi Muslim Janata in Bangladesh. There is no evidence of being any organization or party by this name. Tawhidi Muslim Janata means Tawhidi/Muwahhid (passionate towards Islam) Muslim people. For example, if we say, the people of Britain have united to do this or that. And we added the word "angry" to the word "people of Britain" that, the angry people of Britain have united to do this. Now the Angry People of Britain will not become a party. It may be a common term. But it would be wrong to use the word as a party, unless it really is a party. ~ KHATTAB TALK 13:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ~ KHATTAB TALK 13:31, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 19:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- The Daily Star and the The Business Standard describe them as a separate organization. The Business Standard wrote "Tawhidi Janata, an Islamic outfit,". The New Age writes But another group, said to be Muslim Tawhidi Janata, reached the ground, demanding death penalty for the ‘offender’. The Daily Star and this book, identify them as a separate organization that works with other Islamist extremist organizations in Bangladesh. The angry people of Britain's party are called UKIP.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:45, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is there any logic to move UKIP to Angry people of Britain? If yes, then Jamat-i-Islami Bangladesh and Hefazat-e-Islam can be moved here. Because, recently/news sources the word used maximum time for them. Even if you analyse this article, there is also references that connect them. But actally this would be illogical.

Now about the reference of book and Daily Star. You are right there was some group, whose name almost match with this article. The main problem is that this book describes the events of the 90's and not even one of the group names are completely matched. And the groups mentioned in the book were strictly Jihadists in that they denied the laws of Bangladesh and talked of war, and was aginst of strike/movement. On the other hand the people mentioned in the article are not strictly Jihadists and they support (and they did) to do strike/movement. And the article and other news sources are describing current events, not the 90s. So reference of book/daily star is not acceptable for this article.

last word, who made this party? Where did they form the party? Who is the head of the party? Or at least the name of one member of the party... Without these information how can you accept that the party exists? ~ KHATTAB TALK 06:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Actually This is no any organization. All of news indicate it as a mob. Basically, when the common people in Bangladesh protest about Islam, they named this banner or something similar. So Obviously it should be delete. -- Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 04:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There is no such organisation but we can keep the article as a "term". For that we need to edit the article in such a way. Mehedi Abedin 23:16, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mehediabedin But, In general way Towhidi Muslim Janata means general people of World. So How can we keep or edit this article in such as way? Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 04:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep . I completely agree with Mehediabedin. There are so many strong sources about the page. We should keep it as a "term". --Noman☆ (Talk) 20:12, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MdaNoman Towhidi Muslim Janata is not any kind of page. It is just some keywords or phrase. Any phrase you type and search on Google will get many references for it, then do you want to create articles under that name as well? such as কুরআন প্রেমিক মুসলিম and many things. Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 13:24, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deloar Akram then what will you say about Murad Takla. It's also a phrase (a group of words).--Noman☆ (Talk) 14:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MdaNoman Towhidi Muslim Janata is positive term, that means who loves islam. But this article indicate to extreme group. So this article should be speedy delete for WP:VAND and WP:hoax. Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 15:11, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deloar Akram I am also a muslim. And also know about Towhidi Muslim Janata . But why are you saying about the newspapers?--Noman☆ (Talk) 15:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deloar AkramComment:Loving Islam is neither positive nor negative. See, for example, Criticism of Muhammad. Wikipedia is neutral and this feels like a case of Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEIT.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 09:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Vinegarymass911 Just ask you, Towhidi Muslim Janata is any organization? Or any kind of phrase that denotes specific meaning? Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 10:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––FormalDude talk 08:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~, already deleted from Bengali Wiki.–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 15:26, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Owais Al Qarni — per WP:AFD: "Do not repeat a bolded recommendation on a new bulleted line". Do not vote more than once. Furthermore, an article being deleted on another Wikipedia is not a valid reason for deletion here. Please base your !votes and discussions on policy based reasons for deletion. Thank you —VersaceSpace 🌃 01:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a term or movement. Vegetarianism for instance is neither a party nor an organisation, but certainly there is a vegetarianism movement in esse. The claim that TMJ is an organisation needs a better source than an ambiguous statement in a tabloid newspaper. Real organisations have at least some of the following: a president, a secretary, an e-mail address, a real address where legal documents can be served, press releases, an official webpage, subscriptions and membership cards for its followers. As far as I can see, none of that is evident from the sources. Not even a named spokesperson. SpinningSpark 14:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Spinningspark but that demands the article to be cleaned up, but AfD is not cleanup. If the term Towhidi Muslim Janata has attained some coverage significantly, I feel it merits a standalone article. Best, ─ The Aafī (talk) 07:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Spinningspark and @TheAafi. Yes I can agree with you, it can be kept as a movement. But then the scenario of this article will be completely opposite. This article has been written only in the context of Bangladesh. But "Towhidi Muslim Janata" is a global movement. The movement has for the most part good work, yes also some criticism. But there is also a need to add global criticism instead of Bangladesh.
:It would not be right to keep the article until changes are made. for this time it should be ~~Delete~~. Deloar Akram (Talk • Contribute) 07:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@DeloarAkram: "Move to draft" is an option in such scenarios. BD2412 T 05:00, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DeloarAkram:, you may only make one bolded recommendation in a deletion discussion. If you want to change your recommendation, then strike through your previous comment. SpinningSpark 12:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the Spinning Spark's rationale. Lightburst (talk) 01:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keisha Blair[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search show little about her notability, I don't believe the subject meet notability of author. Mokorow1122 (talk) 08:23, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 August 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:41, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. Shellwood (talk) 07:53, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. pburka (talk) 16:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete paid for vanity spam sourced to sponsored, non-rs and blackhat SEO sources. Massively fails WP:NAUTHOR and pretty much the "C" in CCS (credible) PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is about the best I can find, but it's written by Blair, so not a reliable source [92]. Delete Oaktree b (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I additionally found [93], but it doesn't add much towards WP:GNG. Found various promotional profiles and primary sources (like the https://pages.booknbrunch.com/p/2021/07/a-conversation-with-the-author-of-holistic-wealth-keisha-blair/ interview), but not enough significant independant coverage. Considering WP:NAUTHOR, though some of her books sold well and won awards, the only significant review I could find was https://www.traveltowellness.com/holistic-wealth-keisha-blair/. May consider my !vote if more reviews are found though. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Muaz Kalaycı[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I suspect that this is an autobiography, and I'm unconvinced of notability. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:24, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and Turkey. Shellwood (talk) 20:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 16:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sources are all in Turkish, I don't see any about this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 18:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sources are all about him but they’re not independent and I don’t see any indication of notability. Mccapra (talk) 12:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The Magical Legend of the Leprechauns[edit]

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article. Does not meet GNG or NFILM in its present form. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Film. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Change to Keep - per sources found by Matt below. ~~I found an NY Mag review... but, despite the relative star-power in the film, there does not seem to be any other meaningful coverage. Fails NFILM, GNG.~~ ‡ El cid, el campeador ^talk 15:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- in addition to the NY Mag review that @El cid, el campeador: found here [94], additional reviews from Variety [95], New York Times [96], and Washington Post [97]. There's also some more news coverage from the NY Post [98]. This is a clear GNG pass. matt91486 (talk) 17:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources from Matt91486 – although I'd like to point out that the script I have active tells me the NY Post is not reliable. --LordPeterII (talk) 17:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kehinde Ajose[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interviews and PR piece — good for business but not good for an encyclopaedia. Reading Beans (talk) 06:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Nigeria. Reading Beans (talk) 06:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, appears to have a few deeper articles about him. Andre🚐 05:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! But these articles are PR sources... detailing how he's helping people get publicity. Since they're promotional pieces, it only means they're not independent. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 06:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, he's in the PR field and an author, so I think we're conflating PR pieces versus pieces about him that are about PR. Andre🚐 17:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, Andre, could you point out which sources are "deeper" and aren't just PR spin?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Sources are wall to wall PR and vanispamcruft. Mccapra (talk) 12:52, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PR and fluffy spam pieces as sources, nothing we can use. Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 17:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ✗plicit 07:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ghana Entertainment Awards USA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The problem with writing up an article on award is that you have to find sources that discuss the award itself, not just listing people who have received it. The references here consist of lists of recipients-- I was not able to find in depth independent reliable sources that talk about the award proper (sources like this one lack independence). Without these, we can't host an article on this award. (As an aside, I've sometimes thought we aught to have a subject-specific notability guideline for awards because this issue seems to come up fairly frequently-- thoughts, anyone?). A loose necktie (talk) 04:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A loose necktie:, yes, we do need guidelines on awards. The problem is that awards get used to support the notability of their recipients, so if we get an award wrong, we flood WP with self-promoting "celebrities" who haven't done anything except pay for their awards. There are too many awards that are actually businesses, selling seats at award ceremonies, and permitting anyone to get nominated. We need to differentiate between three categories: (1) genuine, meaningful awards, such as the Oscars; they need articles, and lend notability; (2) totally meaningless and non-notable awards, routine-businesses that make money out of allowing people to preen themselves in front of a mirror; these need no article and lend no notability; (3) awards that would be in category 2 except that they've managed to attract publicity, and therefore deserve an article, but do not lend notability to their recipients. I would like to see a list of meaningful awards, analogous to the perennial sources. Elemimele (talk) 09:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Awards, Entertainment, and Ghana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep when I first read the nominator's argument, I assumed citations are from articles about people that won them, but this not the case. All articles are about the awards and besides name of the winners, the articles also contain more info about the awards. I think these citations are enough to meet WP:GNG.Lovewiki106 (talk) 02:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. I'm not optimistic about the coverage which mainly is lists of people who have won the award.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rita Verreos[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Former reality television contestant & beauty pageant participant. Lacks notability is both fields. Bgsu98 (talk) 00:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Beauty pageants, and Venezuela. Bgsu98 (talk) 00:04, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has something of a career beyond the reality star stuff it seems. Andre🚐 05:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:44, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and some sources on article are directly from the subject. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Allan Panaligan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of person who does not satisfy political notability and does not appear to satisfy general notability. The subject was a council member and acting mayor of a city of 440,000, which is not presumed notable but sometimes is notable. This article does not establish notability. Two of the references are news stories about actions that he took as mayor that are passing mentions of him. One of them is an advertisement for tourism to his city.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	Philstar.com	News story about garbage contract	Yes	Not about the subject	Yes	Yes
2	Philstar.com	News story about traffic enforcement	Yes	Not about the subject	Yes	Yes
3	Issuu.com	Advertisement for travel to the city	No	No	Yes	No

This BLP was created in article space, moved to draft space, and created in article space again. The article should be deleted, and the draft can be expanded in draft space if there is significant coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Philippines. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Note to @Robert McClenon, this template appears to have substed weird. Andre🚐 03:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to User:Andrevan - Yes. I have tried to clean it up. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found several news articles about him at the Google News Archives of what he did as a politician in Pasay. However I'm not convinced they pass WP:POLITICIAN at the moment. [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104]. There are more news articles that are still focused on Pasay City politics but I think this is a good sample size. --Lenticel ^(talk) 08:26, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Politicians at the city level are not automatically guaranteed Wikipedia articles just because they exist — and no, that doesn't change based on whether you're talking about a city councillor or a mayor. Either way, to get a local politician into Wikipedia requires the ability to write a substantial article referenced to a significant volume of media coverage, which establishes his significance by documenting his long-term effects on the development of the city, but that's not what this article is. Obviously this is without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can actually write an article that meets the necessary standards better than this does, but this article, in this form, ain't it. Bearcat (talk) 13:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep May not meet WP:NPOL, but meets WP:BIO with sources presented by Lenticel. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 09:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete definitely doesn't pass NPOL and doesn't pass GNG - the sources found above are insufficient, run of the mill political reporting that any mayor of any town would get. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I already tagged this for notability in its previous incarnation. Mccapra (talk) 14:04, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Additional discussion regarding a possible merge of the contents can take place on the relevant talk pages. ✗plicit 07:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 World Singles Ninepin Bowling Classic Championships – Women's sprint[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Estonia. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:40, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also nominating:

Keep - the event actually got covered in the organizing country (Estonia) pretty well. [105] [106] [107] etc. I'd say no problem with GNG. Pelmeen10 (talk) 15:11, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. To boot, the articles still phrase it in the future tense. The date is months ago. SWinxy (talk) 03:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- That aint a valid reason. A simple fix and now Done. Pelmeen10 (talk) 11:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment why isn't the 2022 World Singles Ninepin Bowling Classic Championships main page for nomination, but its subpage? One valid outcome would be to merge them into 1 page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One final relist to assess Estonian sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The websites I listed are ERR and Postimees. If needed I can find more. Pelmeen10 (talk) 15:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is a notable event that received substantial coverage in its home country. I think some of the concern over this derives from editors not from Estonia. It meets notability standards.--IndyNotes (talk) 17:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all or merge into main article on the 2022 championship. As well as the Estonian sources above, the event is covered in English here. SpinningSpark 13:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice against a renomination. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude talk 04:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Titus Elva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Elva is likely one of the most famous St. Lucian footballers. There is plenty of routine coverage like match reports, and some non-routine stuff like [108]. I don't know that anything in-depth is available online, but as the leading player for his nation (and a prolific goal-scorer in the semi-pro Trinidad & Tobago league), this could be a case for IAR. Jogurney (talk) 14:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
this source mentions the subjects name once. There is literally no source I can find that proves WP:SIGCOV Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:09, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I wasn't suggesting I found SIGCOV of Elva. Instead, while he only receives passing mentions, they strongly suggest unlike most St. Lucian footballers he is notable. From [109], "During the 2000s, numerous St Lucia players were household names in the TT Pro League, including Earl Jean, Elijah Joseph, Valencius Joseph, Sheldon Emmanuel and Titus Elva." Also, from the link above, "Titus Elva had 19 official caps for Saint Lucia. He led a group from Trinidad and Tobago’s W Connection that included Lastic, Earl ‘Ball’ Hog Jean and Elijah Joseph, Romania-based Eric Fannis, David Flavius and Jarvin Skeete from the USA, between 2003 and 2006." My point is he was unusually well-known among St. Lucian footballers, so IAR might be a valid approach here even though we can't locate SIGCOV online. Jogurney (talk) 14:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree that common sense tells us that offline sources for players with as lengthy/prominent a career as this must exist. Giant Snowman 19:42, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As above. Simione001 (talk) 00:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per above. He was clearly significant figure in Saint Lucian football, having been Saint Lucia second highest international all time scorer and fourth highest all time international appearance maker, and has played abroad. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 20. By the time I finish writing this, another 20 will probably be deleted. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Consensus is clearly to Keep this article but without evidence of some SIGCOV, this article will be renominated for AFD2 the day after it is closed without some additional sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or draftify - As I mentioned above, I think there is ample evidence that Elva was a notable sportsperson in his home country and in Trinidad and Tobago (he once scored nine goals in a single match per [110]). I don't think any editor has been able to locate SIGCOV online, which is likely a result of the lack of online internet coverage from St. Lucia and Trinidad & Tobago during the early 2000's. Thus, while the article appears to fail the GNG, the evident fame of this footballer gives us a reason to apply IAR and keep the article. If not, I think draftifying provides an opportunity for further research, especially if someone has access to offline sources from that time period. Jogurney (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above. Systemic bias is a bug, not a feature. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawing (nominator), no objection, the article has been expanded and my concerns are addressed. (non-admin closure) _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zaks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've prodded this with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar". PROD was removed by an anon without any rationale (which I've asked for) nor improvement. Let's discuss. A redirect to Ohio Art Company is my best WP:PRESERVE alternative idea. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Toys and Ohio. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning keep. Following the nomination, an IP has come along and substantially improved the article. If not kept, certainly merge to Irwin Toy, as the product appears to have played a key role in the continuation of the company. BD2412 T 22:39, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing. The expansion was beyond what I considered possible, and I am pleasantly proven wrong. Thank you, anon, and please consider registering an account in the future. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramon Villalobos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

How is a minor and mostly self published comic book writer a notable subject? 47.200.133.225 (talk) 04:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this article for AfD for this IP user.[111] Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 04:23, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ARTIST.Chagropango (talk) 13:55, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wise Bread[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this Article does not seem to really show any notability on the subject and it is an Article with next to nothing. The previous version was reduced significantly due to a conflict of interest and the past version had sources that were too PR-ish in nature and did not really talk about the company. Also lacks WP:SIGCOV. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 03:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agreed, I don't see much for sources we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 17:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Finbar Williams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. Avilich (talk) 22:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 07:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lester Smith (football)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Irvine Smith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:05, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 06:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Perrotte[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Currently unreferenced as well. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:59, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Peters (footballer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Currently unreferenced as well. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't even remember creating this article. I have no objection to its deletion, which I think is a justified request. Sebleouf (talk) 07:06, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Junior Paul[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Currently unreferenced as well. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Grenada. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The best source Google can come up with is this one, which unfortunately is not about Junior Paul, but Vinicius Junior and Paul Pogba. Silly Google. --LordPeterII (talk) 16:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:19, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kenlyn Gonsalves[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:36, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suraj Jeu Thakuri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Nepal. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - @GiantSnowman: Isn't he notable for already playing 8 matches for Nepal national football team? (You can verify this information in national-football-teams.com). Waraka Saki (talk) 07:10, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  No, there is no such thing as automatic notability. Giant Snowman 14:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are not we considering a national team player notable as he/she has already represented his/her country? And one more thing I would like to ask, is it possible for a player to be not notable but still plays in a fully professional leagues? Or every player in fully professional leagues are notable? – Waraka Saki (talk) 14:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet GNG. Avilich (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 01:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nanahira[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any evidence that this satisfies WP:NMUSIC. While yes people in rhythm games have heard tracks from this artist, I cannot find any reliable, independent sources that indicate that this topic warrants its own article. One of the sources listed appears to consist of user generated content, and another is from the own artist's website. Simply being featured in other rhythm games is not sufficient criteria for Wikipedia's notability standards. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 03:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Japan. Shellwood (talk) 08:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Balcombe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:11, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Several commenters have specifically rejected the argument that sources must exist offline. In contrast, none of the people making that argument have given even the slightest indication of where these sources might be. I find the refutations more persuasive and I find a consensus to delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wesley John[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:28, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. I am sure offline sources exist given the extent of his career, but we don't have any. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - @GiantSnowman:, clearly significant figure in St Vincent and the Grenadines football and definitely has offline sources, having played 11 years for national team with double digit caps and been one of few Vincentians to play in Europe, let alone have a 23-year career in Europe. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a valid voting reason Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:48, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure it is. When was the last time we saw a player with over 80 national caps not have any significant coverage - let alone any coverage. We definitely want to see a good reference; but at the same time, there are extreme cases such as this where we need to have some common-sense and apply WP:IAR rather than apply black-and-white thinking. Nfitz (talk) 02:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly notable - played 84 times for his country - usual revisionist nonsense — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zanoni (talk • contribs) 11:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per above comments. The Drover's Wife (talk) 23:02, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found it surprisingly hard to find sources online for this guy considering his career. One little mention on a team sheet [112] is hardly GNG. This probably needs one of the wikipedia community who lives out there to work on!! :/ Govvy (talk) 10:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I was surprised that I wasn't getting much of anything - even boxscores, from Portugese sources. I was wondering if there's a name variation. Though it's hard, even with quotes, to get rid of the 'Wesley, John' results - apparently a well-known vicar. Nfitz (talk) 15:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That vicar does seem to saturate the top results. Govvy (talk) 22:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article on the "vicar" - John Wesley. -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: does not meet WP:GNG. IAR is not valid as an article about a non-notable topic obviously does not improve the encyclopedia. ––FormalDude talk 04:27, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clearly fails GNG and we have nothing to suggest that significant coverage will be found. The project as a whole would be well served by interested parties creating (and populating) lists for players such as this, e.g. List of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines international footballers or similar, so we can bypass these AFDs with redirections (or at least have a valid WP:ATD) and have an article that is useful for readers instead of dozens of stubs that tell them nothing but (mirrored) statistics. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 10:59, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The way to counter a challenge of not meeting GNG is to produce at least two in-depth, high-quality about the subject. There are none in the article, none of the 'keep' arguments have done so and I cannot find anything suitable. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chevron McLean[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jolanshoy McDowall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:20, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 18:17, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 03:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahima Gueye (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR by the looks of it. "The Life Ahead" appears to be the only notable role, probably WP:TOOSOON. KH-1 (talk) 02:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 02:29, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Africa, and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 07:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Senegal-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 03:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG, as he has received only passing mentions as coverage, and WP:NACTOR, as he has only starred in one notable production. Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:14, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Kiligantian[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We might be looking at a 10 year old hoax. Creator just made this article in 2011 and disappeared afterwards. Another editor said that there's no such mountain back in 2011 since Nueva Ecija is a relatively flat province but was reverted.

I ran the mountain's names and "Lakan Gakan" in Google, Google Books, Google News, News Archives and Scholar but did not found anything substantial.

Finally, I've checked Google Maps and its seems that the current coordinates are not registered as a mountain there. There's a nearby Mount Kasahingan though. Lenticel ^(talk) 02:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Philippines. Lenticel ^(talk) 02:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. This should be listed at WP:HOAXLIST. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been on Wikipedia for 11 years, 2 months, and 28 days. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete obviously a hoax. List it also at WP:HOAXLIST per HueMan1. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Was not able to find anything about this location. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:33, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources mention this mountain. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 05:50, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yeah, nothing but Wiki mirrors. No sources at all in a 10 year old article should be telling. Looks like a hoax.:FrederalBacon (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as WP:G3/WP:HOAX. SBKSPP (talk) 01:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:G3 as clearly WP:HOAX. CruzRamiss2002 (talk) 06:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Purp[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary dab page. All of these are partial title matches and are unlikely to be called "Purp". Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)~~[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete reminds me of other nonsense disambigs/redirects like “sexy actress” and “shark incident”. At best it could be redirected as an unlikely but possible typo of “purple” or “perp”, or maybe to “purp and yellow”. Dronebogus (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Plain and simple instance of WP:PTM. The one entry that matches the title does not have a Wikipedia article. No meaningful results online. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This isn't a thing anything used for the dabed subjects, and even a typo redirect of 'perp' to suspect is in the 'mostly unlikely' category. Nate • (chatter) 02:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Portsmouth Grammar School. ✗plicit 03:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Old Portmuthian Club[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No results in Google News or Google News archive, Google search returns only short wikis and the club's website and social media DinoInNameOnly (talk) 00:49, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Portsmouth Grammar School as an ATD. Such coverage about this organisation as can be found is in the context of the school, and its activities in supporting the school and its pupils. I am not seeing the coverage needed to demonstrate notability in its own right, but the Club is mention on the article about the school so a redirect can be appropriate. AllyD (talk) 06:38, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the school article, per AllyD. Waggers TALK 13:00, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Plane Crazy Down Under[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:N. Most of the sources are podcasts, blogs, or self-published. There are a couple sources that look potentially reliable, but I would argue the depth of coverage is not enough to pass notability requirements. The page previously underwent an AfD in 2019 with no consensus and the page has had a maintenance tag calling for additional citations since 2010. I can't find additional sources online. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Aviation, Websites, and Australia. TipsyElephant (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Enthusiast podcast without a lot of WP:N; hopefully this doesn't need three weeks of relists. Nate • (chatter) 02:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:WEB per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 01:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It will be sad to see this page go but I appreciate the reasoning and how it fails to meet the requirements. Sadly, there's not a lot of references to the show in newspapers, magazines and the likes.

Falcon124 (Take that runway, and that, and that...) (talk) 00:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 07:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dashon Johnson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMMA and WP:GNG. HeinzMaster (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Boxing, Martial arts, and California. HeinzMaster (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG. A full article for his fight in Ring Magazine and coverage of various fights with Boxing Scene and Boxing News establishes GNG - an article written by one of Ring's main writers is hardly routine. Plus, major fight camps get non-routine coverage, so him being a sparring partner for Conor McGregor and Manny Pacquiao gets non-routine coverage, which is why non-boxing publications like the The Independent wrote about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RonSigPi (talk • contribs) 20:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - finding a few Johnson-focused news that arent already in the article [113] [[114]. Meets WP:GNG. Nweil (talk) 20:35, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.