The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Purp[edit]

Purp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary dab page. All of these are partial title matches and are unlikely to be called "Purp". Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:42, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete reminds me of other nonsense disambigs/redirects like “sexy actress” and “shark incident”. At best it could be redirected as an unlikely but possible typo of “purple” or “perp”, or maybe to “purp and yellow”. Dronebogus (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Plain and simple instance of WP:PTM. The one entry that matches the title does not have a Wikipedia article. No meaningful results online. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:45, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This isn't a thing anything used for the dabed subjects, and even a typo redirect of 'perp' to suspect is in the 'mostly unlikely' category. Nate • (chatter) 02:37, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.