The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John Patrick Barnes[edit]

John Patrick Barnes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

City councilman, Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Was deprodded by a editor who agreed that this the article fails notability, but wanted an AFD. Rusf10 (talk) 23:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Columbia MO is not a global city for the purposes of getting a city councillor over WP:NPOL #2 the easy way, so its city councillors only get into Wikipedia if they make it the harder way: show a depth of substance and sourcing that marks them out as a special case of significantly greater notability than most other city councillors. That's not what's in evidence here, however. Bearcat (talk) 18:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:Notability per nom. Grey Wanderer (talk) 19:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:16, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep , withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Star Simpson[edit]

Star Simpson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's been 12 years since the last AfD for this article, but I think it's still shy of meeting WP:GNG or other guidelines. All coverage in reliable sources appears to be quite trivial; I can find almost no biographical information about the subject in reliable sources beyond their involvement in a few projects of minor notability. The most significant coverage that I've seen between the sources provided and an internet search is this. Additionally, it may be worth noting that some of the article's claims about Tacocopter, one of Simpson's more notable projects, appears to be misleading based on this Wired article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems no better than the last time it was created, clear delete then and still is. Does not meet WP:GNG. WCM_email 08:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment struck due to significant improvement in the article and sourcing since I commented. WCM_email 15:14, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment While tacocopter was indeed just a concept that generated high press hype, the subject's arrest at the train station was a fairly prominent and real news event of the day, indicative of post 9/11 moods. Bradtem (talk) 02:07, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The Wired article referenced above has undisclosed NPV issues. The Chief Editor of Wired at the time, Chris Anderson, was in the process of raising money for his own drone startup, 3DR. The article has other technical inaccuracies, such as referring to Simpson's electronic art as a "hoax explosive device" and referencing Dustin Boyer as a co-founder, despite him having no official association with the project (beyond what he claims). Taking other articles on TacoCopter into account suggests that while it wasn't structured in a way to grow to a functioning company, because of regulatory issues, it did perform a technical demonstration of the underlying concept with real hardware. Cjhandmer (talk) 02:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Simpson's former delete page makes several strong points for conditional keep, in the event that Simpson achieved attention for more than the arrest at Boston Logan. Since then Simpson has fairly routinely achieved coverage in national and international news sources in areas related to UAVs, electronic art, and the maker movement. Simpson is one of the most prominent hardware-oriented makers of her generation, and certainly among women of color. I concede that better sourcing is needed for biographical detail and am in the process of improving the article in this regard. Cjhandmer (talk) 02:14, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I went into this conversation thinking that I might vote to delete, but I did some more searching for sources about Simpson before making a decision. Beyond the Boston Logan arrest, I found numerous articles in the New York Times, Forbes, The Verge, and Vanity Fair that covered Simpson's life and work. The story that convinced me to vote to keep this article was learning about Star's role as the central source in a 2018 New York Times investigation that motivated over 20,000 Google employees worldwide to walk out in protest of the company's handling of sexual harassment claims. This story led to the resignation of multiple Google executives in 2018. I have updated the article to include those sources. Given Simpson's status as an internationally-recognized whistleblower, I vote that the article should remain. Rubberpaw (talk) 02:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Internationally recognized whistleblower: ✓, One of the most prominent women of color in the hardware maker community: ✓, and of course, arrested during a post 9/11 bomb scare that also created international headlines: ✓. Though the article could be cut down and edited. 73.92.231.99 (talk) 02:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Withdraw I've been swayed by arguments and would be happy to withdraw the AfD, but as Bradtem WCM also voted delete, they need to agree as well. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I did not vote delete, I left a comment moderately in favour. Where do you get I voted delete? While tacocopter was a concept rather than real service, it was a notable concept. Bradtem (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Bradtem, sorry, I copied the wrong name, I meant to ping User:Wee Curry Monster _signed, Rosguill ^talk 01:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Passes WP:SIGCOV and subsequently WP:BIO. A solid keep. I see it has been Afd withdrawn. The consensus is for a keep. I will close this. scope_creep^Talk 13:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. I appreciate the hard work that has gone into improving the article and am now satisified that notability has been met. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship in Kashmir[edit]

Censorship in Kashmir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged with a notability concern since 2012. The article doesn't describe censorship in Kashmir in general, rather a single event from 2010 that doesn't seem to have significance long-term, failing WP:NOTNEWS. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There is no point in deleting this article because this is a serious issue and it is properly referenced. If someone is interested in editing it further, they should be allowed to do it. -- Abhijeet Safai (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I think it's clear that this topic meets the general notability criterion that the topic should have been the subject of significant independent coverage. At the moment, the inline references in the article focus on particular media blackouts, but a look at scholar.google.com shows that there's a wider academic discussion of censorship in Kashmir too. I've added Censorship in Kashmir#Further reading to evidence this. It would be easy to add extra news reports on individual episodes of censorship, but I hope the academic bibliography is enough to show notability. Alarichall (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per arguments above. The referencing is sound. MidwestSalamander (talk) 23:33, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I agree that this topic meets general notability criterion. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The text has been improved since the nomination. Just as there are many articles ceated many years ago that get proposed for deletion, so we have tags that are many years old and no longer serve their purpose. On the basis of improvements, the contested article passes WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 18:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Impacts of terrorism on French tourism[edit]

Impacts of terrorism on French tourism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very much reads like a personal essay, reflection on a topic or study notes. WP:NOT. Unclear sourcing _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Some sort of essay. WP:NOT. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Unfocused and of no use to the reader. Mccapra (talk) 22:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge This article should be merged either to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_France or to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_France, more likely the latter, to simply delete everything would be a waste. Garlicolive (talk) 01:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Garlicolive: I agree that there is merit to add a section about the effects of terrorism on French tourism to one or both of those articles. However, there is little of substance to salvage from this article as the writing style is very much like an essay or opinion piece. Adding a section or paragraph to those articles would essentially be a complete rewrite. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 07:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know french, if this article needs to be rewritten from the french sources then that complicate things, unless new sources are found, but in this case, regardless, then this article cannot be useful for me, anyway. Garlicolive (talk) 02:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not a High School English or Social Science class. Essay only.VViking_TalkEdits 21:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and because its original research. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 10:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Per above, the article looks like an essay. Alex-h (talk) 17:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• WP:HEYMANN upgrade needed on notable topic. Here is some of the coverage in the NYTimes:

• A Year After Paris Attacks, Challenges for Hotels and Restaurants
• A Year After Paris Attacks, Challenges for Hotels and Restaurants
• https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/17/business/international/france-shootings-economy.html
• [https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/world/europe/paris-tourism.html Paris Tourism Has Recovered From 2015 Attacks, Officials Say

Note to closing administrator, please consider rolling this one over for a week, to give editors time to improve article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NOTESSAY. On second thought, it really is a terrible essay. No prejudice against a well-writtern , well-sourced page on the topic should an editor put the essay into writing one - the impact of the terror attacks (especially 2015 attack) on tourism was a major hit to the French economy and was widely covered in WP:RS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:43, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a contrived subject for an article, better presented within a larger context. It also reads awfully close to an essay, either on a personal initiative or as an educational project. On that basis, we should Delete the whole thing or, possibly, and mercifully, Merge what can be salvaged onto the "Tourism in France" article. -The Gnome (talk) 18:59, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair competition: Uber vs taxis and Airbnb vs hotels[edit]

Unfair competition: Uber vs taxis and Airbnb vs hotels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very much reads like a personal essay, reflection on a topic or study notes. WP:NOT. Unclear sourcing. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Some sort of essay. WP:NOT. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A piece of POV writing. Mccapra (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete I agree with the other users here, essay, POV writing, and completely no inline citations. VViking_TalkEdits 13:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete obv. way outside of a scope. --mikeu ^talk 23:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, POV writing. Alex-h (talk) 17:44, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this personal essay on a subject that is essentially contrived. -The Gnome (talk) 19:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A potential "business as usual" Brexit ?[edit]

A potential "business as usual" Brexit ? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article. Very much reads like a personal essay or reflection on a topic. WP:NOT _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Some sort of essay. WP:NOT. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I have a horrible feeling that somewhere there is a well-intentioned teacher doing an editathon to get students whose first language is french to create new articles. It’s not going well. Mccapra (talk) 22:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete clear essay. SportingFlyer T·C 01:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is clearly an essay not an encyclopaedia article. If this is part of a class project then I wouldn't object to temporary userfication to allow for the content to be retrieved by the author for use in a more appropriate venue. Thryduulf (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all the above. VViking_TalkEdits 21:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ﷴﷺﷴﷺﷴﷺ (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - totally agree with the above comments. This is definitely not a Wikipedia article, but an essay and it is unlikely it could ever be reworked into an article. Dunarc (talk) 19:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this text of barely hidden propaganda. Why it was ever allowed to stay up is another small mystery. -The Gnome (talk) 19:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit's consequences on Mauritius[edit]

Brexit's consequences on Mauritius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article. Very much reads like a personal essay or reflection on a topic. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete Some sort of essay. WP:NOT. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails a bunch of WP:NOT, especially the essay portion. SportingFlyer T·C 01:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. this is clearly an essay. It's not impossible that there is something here that could be useful at Economy of Mauritius but more likely is that the essay's sources will be useful for adding encyclopaedic content there. Thryduulf (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this is clearly an essay agree with all aboveVViking_TalkEdits 21:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Per all Above, Fails WP:NOT Alex-h (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete as per all of the above.TH1980 (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Another personal work about an unworthy subject. -The Gnome (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fully agree with above points. Very similar case to the essay-like article discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A potential "business as usual" Brexit ? which seems to have been created by the same user. Dunarc (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:49, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WebRatio Platform[edit]

WebRatio Platform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid-for corporate spam about non-notable software. Was draftified twice and tendentiously moved back to mainspace by the author (who I have blocked for being a spam-only account). MER-C 19:47, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the reasons outlined. Even if this article had been written by someone without a conflict of interest, it's hard to see how it would demonstrate sufficient notability to be acceptable. --Yamla (talk) 12:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I looked for references and found nothing suitable to show notability. It also looks like it extends beyond English Wikipedia (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebRatio_Platform), although I cannot see the page due to the blackout. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete due to an utter lack of good references. MidwestSalamander (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this poor promotional effort masquerading as a Wikipedia article, on the basis of, for starters, WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 19:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sort of a "soft merge" as there isn't really much of a consensus here for want of participants. I am taking Mccapra's last comment as indicating that they might have changed their opinion towards a merge. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iranian legislative election, 2016 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr)[edit]

Iranian legislative election, 2016 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article covering the results of national election for a single constituency, which is unnecessary and largely duplicates the content of the article on the constituency (to which anything useful and not already included could be merged). Also nominating the same for the following reason:

• Iranian legislative election, 2012 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr)
• Iranian legislative election, 2008 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr)
• Iranian legislative election, 2004 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr)
• Iranian legislative election, 2000 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr)
• Iranian legislative election, 1980 (Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr)

For a similar previous AfD, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom general election, 2015 (Lancashire) (which actually covered several constituencies). Number 57 18:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I contested the PRODs on these articles. They are well researched and well sourced. Most of the candidates are blue linked so appear notable in themselves. I just don’t see what the objection is to these articles. I don’t think ‘not necessary’ is a reason for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 19:15, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Mccapra: Election results for individual constituencies are supposed to be summarised on the constituency article itself (as most of this already is at Tehran, Rey, Shemiranat and Eslamshahr (electoral district). If having results articles for each constituency for each election was deemed acceptable, it would add >10,000 articles just for the UK for the 20th century alone. We're probably talking about close to a million articles if this was copied across all countries. These are the primary reasons why these articles are unnecessary, and there is clear precedent. Number 57 21:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thanks. If this is the norm you’re applying I don’t understand why didn’t you merge the articles rather than PROD them, except that because Iran has large multimember constituencies, trying to roll all this up into a single constituency article would be unworkable. These articles may have an unusually high level of detail but where is the harm in that? It seems to me to be a perfectly good way of presenting information that would be hard to present in any other format. Mccapra (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • ok I see that I’ve missed the critical fact that the info is already there on the constituency article. My fault for not not looking. Mccapra (talk) 22:19, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nomination lacks a valid reason to delete; its point about a single source is now erroneous and there is little support for it. See WP:SK and WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) Andrew D. (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of deadliest animals to humans[edit]

List of deadliest animals to humans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Copying my reasoning from Talk:List of deadliest animals to humans) This list is problematic in several ways:

1. It is copied from just one source.
2. The source gives no information about how this list was determined, so "due to any type of cause of death" has simply been made up by the person who wrote this article.
3. The source lists a total mish-mash of species, genera and higher-level taxons, for example all snakes are lumped together.
4. According to the source the 24th most deadly animal only killed one person. Of course there are more than 24 types of animal that have killed more than one person: think of all the deadly parasites, to start with. That is obvious nonsense so the source is obviously unreliable.
5. I'm sure there are many other reasons, but I've already listed more than enough to show that this whole article is complete bollocks.

Phil Bridger (talk) 19:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Very easy to find sources. I just referenced some of the list. A lot of reliable sources mention the most deadly animals towards people, so it passes the general notability guidelines. Dream Focus 19:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Dream Focus 19:59, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep No pretense of compliance with WP:Before. Lots of on line sources available, as would be proved if the nominator had bothered to click on the links at the top of this very page. This is the kind of article that folks looking to wikipedia need. WP:Not paper. To be sure, sourcing and links can (and should) be improved. But that is at bottom a content dispute, not a reason for WP:AFD. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:20, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Highly encyclopedic. There's nothing wrong with article that cannot be fixed. Surachit (talk) 22:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify per WP:TNT (the process of which has already begun) - sure, it might be notable, but in its current state, I don't think it's ready to be in mainspace. Move it to draft, fix it up, then move it back. If it's significantly improved by the time the discussion ends, consider this a keep. ansh666 01:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'll have to agree with the AFD proponent that the article has issues, but the article can be improved and is notable in itself, the reasons listed do not warrant a delete. Garlicolive (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Is the most deadliest animals to humans.... man?! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  The article clearly states that humans come in second place to mosquitoes based on their yearly kill count. Dream Focus 22:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Highly encyclopedic. There's nothing wrong with article that cannot be fixed Lubbad85 (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Topic is notable with a lot of WP:RS lists, like Telegraph, and notably, the Encyclopædia Britannica. The article however as noted by the nom has problems with some non-Encyclopædic sourcing (I removed one), and a composite list which is WP:OR terrority. I don't think the article is so bad that I would WP:TNT it, and the BBC is a decent RS, however, I only give it the benefit of the doubt because of the strong notability of the topic, which is the most dominant criteria. Britishfinance (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – A notable topic that meets WP:LISTN. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep somewhat to my surprise. I do have a quibble with one entry: mosquitoes don't kill people - it is the mosquito-borne diseases. Maybe clarify in a footnote... --mikeu ^talk 00:33, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Fixed Obviously, mosquitoes don't kill people directly. Rather, they are the agent transmitting Mosquito-borne disease. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to R. J. Adams. Tone 20:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Missions of California[edit]

The Missions of California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about some documentary video appears to be promotional (advertising), and does not meet notability standards. The References section is generic about the nominal subject of the video and the references are not about the video itself. R. S. Shaw (talk) 18:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to R. J. Adams. The documentary received a 200-word review by Mary Soete in Library Journal ("The Missions of California", Library Journal volume 124, issue 14, September 1, 1999, page 249) but otherwise does not seem to have received significant coverage in multiple independent RS, or really much coverage at all from anywhere. The article text is clearly promotional, and the reference list is misleading as the listed sources, as best I can tell, do not mention the film at all. But just in case someone searches for that specific title, there's no harm in redirecting to the film creator's article per WP:ATD-R. Bakazaka (talk) 04:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per the sound argument above and my own inability to find sources to help further. MidwestSalamander (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The nomination doesn't have a reason to delete, the points it makes are now erroneous and there is no support for it. See WP:SK and WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) Andrew D. (talk) 08:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Candida blankii[edit]

Candida blankii (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's only one sentence here; seven words, of which two are the title of the article. MrDemeanour (talk) 18:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep No pretense of complying with (or even considering) WP:Before. To be sure, article can be improved, but this is a content dispute, not a reason to WP:AFD. Ipse dixit does not apply here. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article and sourcing has been greatly expanded. It is not what it was when nominated for deletion. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:26, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge(striking merge option since article has been expanded) There are thousands of scientific articles like this on Wikipedia. People searching for it see where to click on to find more information elsewhere. Perhaps consider creating a list of all Candida and then merging some of the shorter candida articles together on it, with the larger ones having their own articles linked to. Candida oleophila Candida bromeliacearum Candida bracarensis etc. are rather short. Is there a bot to look through every article in a category and list their sizes, or compare references to see which ones have the same references and external links? Category:Candida_(fungus) has 29 entries. Dream Focus 19:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created List of Candida (fungus) as a possible merge target. Surely this has come up before, short articles like this existing throughout Wikipedia's history in large numbers. A community consensus on whether they are acceptable or should be merged should be had. Dream Focus 19:22, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I've added a few references. Josh Milburn (talk) 20:00, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Species are inherently notable and many sources exist. See WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. There is no evidence of the nominator complying with WP:BEFORE, as there are a multitude of sources that can be found with a simple Google search. The article has also been expanded and improved since the original nomination. MarkZusab (talk) 20:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saffron Taylor[edit]

Saffron Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source in the article I could actually verify is Citynet, & that's not enough.Google New sources are about other people with that name; additional ones in Google are either publicity or not helpful. Given the way Google works, the most prominent source advertising her is Wikipedia DGG ( talk ) 16:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:37, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The name sounds familiar but when you can’t verify anything then what’s the point of an article? Trillfendi (talk) 17:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:NMODEL. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 17:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per norm, there practically nothing from GNEWS to ascertain WP:RS. Fails WP:NMODEL. Lapablo (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

J-Subculture[edit]

J-Subculture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PROD-ed this with the rationale Does not appear to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Two local stories along with social media links does not suffice for WP:NCORP. However, RockmanY left a message on my talk page here. I do not have a native understanding of Japanese so it is possible my Google Translate source searches were not up to scratch, so I am bringing it to AfD for the community to examine. SITH (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as one of many proxy shopping services that verifiably exist but do not receive significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, much less to the level required by WP:NCORP. The purpose of the article is clearly to advertise the business, so the article falls under the policy "What Wikipedia is not", particularly this part of WP:NOTADVERTISING: "Wikipedia articles about a company or organization are not an extension of their website or other social media marketing efforts". Bakazaka (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless better sources can be found. The current sourcing clearly fails to demonstrate notability per WP:NCORP; I had a look for better sources using the links above, but didn't find anything - some WP:UGC reviews, some non-independent stuff, but nothing meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. It's possible a Japanese speaker might have more luck in finding sources, but with what's there now it's a delete. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. And start over. -The Gnome (talk) 19:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:50, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Crilly[edit]

Martin Crilly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacked any independent sources since creation in March 2010 when it was created by a SPA who has made no other edits. I can't find any indepth coverage. Fails WP:AUTHOR. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:56, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:56, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The only sources provided are the subject's own writings. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 18:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete A.S. not notable. Mccapra (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable Lubbad85 (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no notability found.E.M.Gregory (talk) 07:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not notable,Alex-h (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete since subject fails WP:AUTHOR. -The Gnome (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Larry C. Brewer[edit]

Larry C. Brewer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NGRIDIRON. Never played beyond training camp, sourcing is a bunch of yearbooks, obits that aren't even his, and unlinked local newspaper articles. GPL93 (talk) 14:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment going to take some time to leaf through the potential online and offline sources for this one--hard to imagine that a primary target for Terry Bradshaw in college didn't generate enough press to pass WP:GNG.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did do a search but couldn't really find much. The author of this article, the User:Billy Hathorn, was known for inflating notability of his article subjects and then used literally whatever sources he could find, mostly obituaries, primary sources like government records, or original research back up his claim of notability. While Brewer was a target of Bradshaw's, he was what about the equivalent of about an All-Sunbelt tight end who was on a training camp roster. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confident you've made a good-faith nomination. Based on the article itself, it doesn't look good.--Paul McDonald (talk) 00:58, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here is at least one instance of significant coverage. Rlendog (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete simply doesn't clear the WP:NGRIDIRON hurdle. Worth noting as well is that the article lacks sources. It has a yearbook, a newspaper article, and two more links. I have no opposition if this is kept but he doesn't feel notable enough to have his own article. James-the-Charizard (talk) 01:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does not have substantive sources to pass GNG or SNG. Reywas92^Talk 06:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to James O'Brien (filmmaker)#Wish You Were Here & Hyperfutura. (non-admin closure) ––Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:05, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wish You Were Here (2013 film)[edit]

Wish You Were Here (2013 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undersourced and fails WP:NFILM and DGG told there may be printed material. It needs a proper search. If not, it's a necessary redirect. Sheldybett (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:01, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to James O'Brien (filmmaker)#Wish You Were Here & Hyperfutura as WP:ATD. There was no need to raise a PROD or bring this to AfD at all. The one and only reference in the article comes from a blog making it unreliable, and there is nothing I can find in my searches. So it fails both WP:GNG and WP:NF for lack of any significant coverage, awards or reviews from reliable secondary sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mirza Muhammad Khanbahadur[edit]

Mirza Muhammad Khanbahadur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only source is an index page, his name in the title of the article doesn't match his name in the article, and see WP:ANI#Repeated addition of unsourced content and creation of unsourced pages Doug Weller talk 12:35, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons - mismatched name, one source being an index page, although this one also uses an unreliable source, royalark.net[1]:

Azimuddin Qutluq Muhammad Khizer Sultan Bahadur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Doug Weller talk 12:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Neither of the sources actually mention the subjects.[2][3] I think it's just an example of fictitious references. Alivardi (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete We discourage purely genealogical articles. Being a leading in the Indian Mutiny might constitute notability, but the bare mention of this (without details of what he did) will not do. I would reconsider my vote if the article were altered to say what he did (with RS). Peterkingiron (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seang Chanthea[edit]

Seang Chanthea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:56, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - another poorly sourced article which searches show doesn't meet WP:NFOOTY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chea Vansak[edit]

Chea Vansak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - seems he was on the Cambodian national squad for AFF 2018 (a backup goalkeeper), but sat on the bench.[4][5][6]. Icewhiz (talk) 12:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks, but this is U-23, and we would need the national team.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  This is the national team AFAICT, not U-23. He didn't play though.Icewhiz (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, you are right.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete A7 – Subject's league isn't fully professional per WP:FPL. The only reference is Soccerway; there are no references suggesting significant coverage from independent reliable secondary sources (no WP:42). There is no credible claim in this article of significance or importance, or anything that would approach meeting notability under WP:NFOOTY, WP:GNG or any other notability guideline. The article should be speedy deleted under WP:CSD#A7. Leviv ich 04:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Speedy deletion completely inappropriate @Levivich:. GiantSnowman 13:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  GiantSnowman, why? Leviv ich 17:12, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Levivich: - "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines." GiantSnowman 18:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GS. (Why do you make me pull teeth, though? You just quoted back to me the same language I had in my initial comment–what's the point of your spending time to do that?) My question is: what "credible claim of significance or importance" does this article make? All it claims is he's a football player in a non-professional league. Why does, or should, this count as "significance" or "importance"? Leviv ich 18:32, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because playing football can be a credible claim of significance/importance. A7 is used for really basic things like "X is a man" not "Y is a footballer playing in the top league in his country". GiantSnowman 20:47, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hul Kimhuy[edit]

Hul Kimhuy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:46, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Hul has played for the Cambodian national football team in a tier-one international football match. (1). Therefore he meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 11:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - international player, meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs improving. GiantSnowman 13:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saveng Samnang[edit]

Saveng Samnang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP:GNG, WP:NFOOTY - I could not find in dept sources in the 97 hits on google. As such there are insufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. Plays in the Cambodian League, which according to WP:FPL is not a fully professional league. Has not played in a competitive senior international match. As such he does not meet WP:NFOOTY. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Chansopheak[edit]

Ken Chansopheak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Ken has played for the Cambodian national football team in a tier-one international football match. (1). Therefore he meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 11:13, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - international player, meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs improving. GiantSnowman 13:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Now I see that this qualifies for speedy as a recreation of previously delete article. I did not notice this previously. Speedy deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ouk Sovann[edit]

Ouk Sovann (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 16:50, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chhong Bunnath[edit]

Chhong Bunnath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:52, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Chhong has played for the Cambodian national football team in a tier-one international football match. (1). Therefore he meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 11:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - international player, meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs improving. GiantSnowman 13:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chea Vesley[edit]

Chea Vesley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:58, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – obvious NFOOTY fail, doesn't meet GNG, no references in the article, no sources to be found. Articles like this should be A7. Players who haven't yet played a game in a non-professional league (even if it's the top league in their country) shouldn't be considered "significant" or "important" for A7 purposes. Leviv ich 03:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I've verified that User:A.Jacobin and User:AndersZorn are both subject to WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 due to having too few edits. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:25, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bassel al-Araj[edit]

Bassel al-Araj (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Beyond the rather serious POV issues (e.g "Israeli occupation forces"), this activist is simply not notable. Prior to his death, his social media posts and protesting did not generate SIGCOV. His death, in a shootout with IDF, did generate coverage but of a WP:BIO1E nature and mainly around the event itself. We generally do not maintain bio pages for casualties/martyrs -WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (per Al Jazeera source) Fails WP:SIGCOV. Sourcing to partisan websites like /samidoun.net does not add to notability. There was a brief, minor flurry of coverage limited to the Israel/Palestinian region at the time of the shootout between this armed activist and security forces attempting to arrest him. Post 2017 sources limited to a memorial article in Electronic Intifada, deprecated by noticeboard consensus as "generally unreliable." But WP:NOTMEMORIAL.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • • Og this is rich, E.M.Gregory: seeing all those total unknown Israelis you have started WP:MEMORIAL articles on, when they were killed? Your double standards reaches new record height all the time: congratulations. Huldra (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Unlike all those totally unknown Israelis that, say E.M.Gregory and others have started WP:MEMORIAL articles about, Bassel al-Araj was a fairly well known name, at least on the West Bank, before he was killed. (BTW, if this article is deleted, I will AfD dozens and dozens of those WP:MEMORIALs, because then we have a completely new standard here). There are articles about Bassel al-Araj in Jadaliyya, al Jazeera, Middle East Eye, Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, Times of Israel; you name it. Huldra (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not a known name in RSes. Social media is... Social media. WP:OSE on other possible NOTMEMORIAL articles is not a valid AfD rationale.Icewhiz (talk) 21:10, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  It is mentioned in RS that he was a well known name on the West Bank. And that is a valid rationale against AfD, Huldra (talk) 21:20, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Somewhat known social media activist - does not confer notability (nor pre-death coverage in RSes of any note).Icewhiz (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  RS disagree, Huldra (talk) 21:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huldra, you may want to reread WP:SOURCES and WP:GNG. I can always be persuaded to reconsider an iVote if someone brings reliable, SECONDARY WP:SOURCES that meet WP:GNG. But coverage has to be SUSTAINED, not, as here, a brief news cycle.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not a notable person or event.A.Jacobin (talk) 14:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)User disallowed from commenting here per WP:ARBPIA3[reply]

• Keep. A quick search of LexisNexis for al-Araj's name in Arabic script produces a fourteen pieces of newspaper/news agency coverage of him through 2016 in his work as an activist and regarding his imprisonment and trial, alongside the extensive coverage after his death. My Arabic is very poor so I can't add this stuff into the article until I have much more time on my hands, but there material is there. Of course, if we did still conclude that al-Araj is not notable as a person, the article could simply be renamed something like 'Death of Bassel al-Araj' and its notability assessed on that basis. Alarichall (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you email me the text of those articles I can take a look. nableezy - 22:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That'd be great. Email me at a.t.p.hall@leeds.ac.uk and then I'll know your edress and can send you some material. Alarichall (talk) 23:58, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

done. nableezy - 01:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Lack of WP:SUSTAINED coverage of his death (beyond the cycle around the death itself) precludes notability of a "death of" article. Icewhiz (talk) 13:54, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This armed fighter, apparently a pharmacist in his day job, left a suicide note and was killed in a 2-hour gun battle with Israeli authorities. He was an obscure figure before his death, his death was the routine death of individuals who take up arms against a legitimate government, and he has remained obscure in the years since his death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndersZorn (talk • contribs) 13:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC) User disallowed from commenting here by WP:ARBPIA3[reply]
• Keep - per this Al-Jazeera article 2 years later devoted entirely to al-Araj and his impact, demonstrating sustained in-depth coverage. nableezy - 00:27, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I've just emailed User:Nableezy a large collection of Arabic newspaper articles mentioning al-Araj -- including some from before his death. This would definitely improve the source base for this article, and should help establish his notability or non-notability. I'd like to suggest that people hold off deciding about this until Nableezy has had a chance to look at this material and post here, therefore. Alarichall (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggest closing editor roll this one over for a week to see whether the sources mentioned above constitute SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Reiterate my keep from above. Along with the al-Jazeera article two years later entirely about him, there is coverage in November 2018 on his works being published posthumously. There was also contemporary coverage of his arrest in 2016 by the PA, the hunger strike he took, his release ordered by the Palestinian courts, and of Israeli raids on his familys home from 2016-2018 in the sources Alarichall emailed me. These sources span several years, they satisfy the requirement for in depth, sustained coverage. Ill add what I have time for to the article now, but the nomination rationale has been thoroughly debunked. nableezy - 16:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Not going to !vote but I think Nableezy does present a quite clear case of notability here. BabbaQ (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are now no valid delete !votes, think this can be closed per WP:SNOW. nableezy - 16:42, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teath Kimheng[edit]

Teath Kimheng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- He has played for the Cambodian national football team in a tier-one international football match. (1). Therefore he meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 11:03, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - international player, meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs improving. GiantSnowman 13:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:51, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tes Sambath[edit]

Tes Sambath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – no GNG, no NFooty, non-notable football player. Leviv ich 01:12, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 15:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kan Pisal[edit]

Kan Pisal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Kan has played for the Cambodian national football team in a tier-one international football match. (1). Therefore he meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 10:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - international player, meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs improving. GiantSnowman 13:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sin Sophanat[edit]

Sin Sophanat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP, the subject has never played in a fully professional league thus failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 11:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:15, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Sin has played for the Cambodian national football team in a tier-one international football match. (1). Therefore he meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 10:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - international player, meets WP:NFOOTBALL, needs improving. GiantSnowman 13:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Actually does pass WP:NFOOTY per above. I suggest nom withdraw this so we don't waste a week on this AfD. Smartyllama (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ángel Carrascosa[edit]

Ángel Carrascosa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. no indication that the subject has ever played in a fully professional league, thereby failing WP:NFOOTY. No indication he passes WP:GNG. Ymblanter (talk) 11:44, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:17, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – doesn't pass NFooty, can't find coverage to satisfy GNG. Leviv ich 00:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn--Ymblanter (talk) 15:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Ramos[edit]

Alexis Ramos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP. no indication that the subject has ever played in a fully professional league, thereby failing WP:NFOOTY. No indication he passes WP:GNG. Ymblanter (talk) 11:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -- Ramos has played in both the Venezuelan Primera División and the Uruguayan Primera División (per 1) which are both fully-professional per WP:FPL. This means he clearly meets WP:NFOOTY. Certaintly needs a clean-up though. Tropicanan (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. GiantSnowman 13:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Article about journeyman footballer who has played in the Uruguayan and Venezuelan fully-pro leagues which appears to be able to satisfy the GNG based on some searches of online Argentine sources. I attempted to flesh out the article a bit, but it needs more work. Jogurney (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The South Indian[edit]

The South Indian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Run-of-the-mill coverage. The business exists, but lacks "significant" coverage to make it notable. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:38, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 11:39, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. A site:.dk search did not reveal sources that would make the article pass GNG. Sam Sailor 19:31, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: An article describing a small restaurant chain whose best sources are a routine listing and a review of their menu items. I am not seeing evidence that this is more than a run-of-the-mill business and is worthy of encyclopaedic note. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Souleymane Coulibaly (footballer, born 1988)[edit]

Souleymane Coulibaly (footballer, born 1988) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is incredible mess since it mixes at least two football players but neither of them ever played in a fully professional league and has notability to be included to Wikipedia. Ymblanter (talk) 11:37, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:11, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This article seems to have been created in such haste that it is impossible to know who the subject is actually supposed to be. There may be at least three footballers from at least two different countries combined here. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as A7. A completely empty “international career” section? Oh wait... it’s because he obviously doesn’t have one. Trillfendi (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:34, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I simply can't find anything online to verify this footballer ever played in a fully-professional league or otherwise is the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. Jogurney (talk) 13:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neou Soksela[edit]

Neou Soksela (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically unreferenced, but if the information in the article is correct the subject never played in a fully professional league thereby failing WP:NFOOTY, and I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG. Ymblanter (talk) 11:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - one of a series of articles by this editor, who simply puts a link to a Soccerway page, not having anything to do with the subject of the article. Apparently, does not meet WP:NFOOTY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reiya Kinoshita[edit]

Reiya Kinoshita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically unreferenced, but if the information in the article is correct the subject never played in a fully professional league thereby failing WP:NFOOTY, and I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG. Ymblanter (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - one of a series of articles by this editor, who simply puts a link to a Soccerway page, not having anything to do with the subject of the article. Apparently, does not meet WP:NFOOTY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:57, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 12:12, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Tropicanan (talk) 11:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 13:22, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:41, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cree-L Kofford[edit]

Cree-L Kofford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC, as per WP:BEFORE searches. This source provides a bit of coverage, but it is mostly quotations and also falls short of being significant coverage. This source consists almost entirely of a quotation, making it primary in nature, which does not establish notability. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete pbp 13:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Technically one could also say "keep" as the case for it meeting NFOOTY appears to be reasonably widely shared. GNG is murkier as it doesn't seem there are enough substantial sources. On balance a "no consensus" case as there has been a tendency to prioritize GNG criteria over the subject-specific notability critieria, but not to the point where only GNG counts. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Lloyd (footballer, born 1958)[edit]

Kevin Lloyd (footballer, born 1958) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two sub appearances is pushing WP:NFOOTBALL to breaking point. Lloyd went on to play in Australia but not in a WP:FPL. He fails WP:GNG as well. Dougal18 (talk) 10:55, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:02, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL. Needs improving, which I'm sure @Kosack and ChrisTheDude: can assist with given he played for their teams... GiantSnowman 13:35, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll take a look in my Gills books tonight. BTW I wasn't notified as the article creator (although I have to say I was surprised when I checked the edit history to see that it was actually me that created it :-) ).... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:37, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I've added enough to make him look likely to pass GNG, and he passes NFOOTY anyway. He played top-flight football in Australia, not just state league, which the article didn't mention (still not fully pro, obviously). cheers, Struway2 (talk) 16:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - meets WP:NFOOTY having played in a fully professional league and the recent additions made have fleshed this article out considerably. There appears to be enough coverage to meet WP:GNG as well in my opinion. Kosack (talk) 16:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Questions – The offline sources cited in the article cite to one page each. I don't have access to any of them. For anyone who does, are all of those significant coverage, or some, or none? Also, do those sources (or any) dispute that he played in only 2 games, both as a sub? Thanks. Leviv ich 00:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Of the newspaper sources covering his pre-Football League career, ref currently #3, "Lloyd snapped up by Cardiff" is SIGCOV, the other two are routine two-or-three sentences that say pretty much what they've been used to verify. The Harman book just gives his Worcester City stats. I can't see the Gillingham or Cardiff books, but typically such books give a profile of each player, sometimes brief, sometimes in considerable detail. Don't think there's any doubt that he played in the Football League once each for two different clubs, on both occasions as the substitute (you only got one sub in those days); the article says he also played in the FA Cup for Gillingham. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:37, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • His profile in the Gills book is about a third of a page.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:18, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete – Thanks to Struway and Chris for answering my questions. From what I can gather, this article has 3 NFooty games (2 subs and 1 cup), plus 1 SIGCOV, not enough to meet GNG, so a barely scrapes by NFooty + no GNG = delete for me. Leviv ich 22:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Orangeburg massacre#Deaths. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:07, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Hammond Jr.[edit]

Samuel Hammond Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be a redirect to the massacre, where it is covered in more detail. No notability outside the massacre. Perfect example of WP:BIO1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Civil Rights Movement-related deletion discussions. Mitchumch (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Orangeburg massacre per BIO1E. Biography with trivial biographical depth outside the event. An independent search for reliably sourced coverage provides only the rudimentary information. • Gene93k (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Orangeburg massacre. BIO1E. Search results all connected to the massacre and article doesn't contain much that isn't in the massacre already.Icewhiz (talk) 12:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or move to Draft space: Onel5969 Gene93k Icewhiz The scope of this article is identical to all four articles of murdered students Jeffrey Miller, Sandra Lee Scheuer, Allison Krause, and William Knox Schroeder known for the famous Kent State shootings in 1970. All four of those articles are notable for one event. None of those four articles have any record of being proposed for deletion. What is the difference between the Samuel Hammond Jr. article and those four student articles? Mitchumch (talk) 18:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:OSE is a poor argument - and some of those victims may merit deletion as well (though on some of them, it is a harder call). The question is whether the victim has received SIGCOV divorced from the event. For our subject here, our article merely repeats the massacre article, possibly adding: "Hammond grew up with two sisters, Zenobbie Clark and Diana Carter. They called him the affectionate nickname, "Bubba." At the age of 18, Hammond began attending South Carolina State College." and "After receiving the news, his mother was so upset she had to be sedated.". With such additional content there is little merit for a spinoff from the massacre and it does not seem we are anywhere beyond WP:BIO1E. Icewhiz (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • These articles show the same problems. Whether there is significant coverage about the persons as individuals to salvage the articles is a matter for another discussion. The Allison Krause article is a marginally better state. As for Samuel Hammond, nobody has found significant reliably sourced biographical coverage yet. • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a stub, not a start-class article. Transfer the article to the creator's sandbox so it can be built up. Mitchumch (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirecting as proposed will not lose any content. Any editor can restore an article from redirect if and when non-trivial RS coverage for the person can be demonstrated. Moving to draft sets a 6-month clock for the draft to be improved or face a G13 speedy. The biographical content independent of the event is trivial. Keeping a draft with an unsubstantiated hope of improvement accomplishes little. • Gene93k (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transferring the content to the creator's sandbox is an option. Doing so harms no one and nothing. Mitchumch (talk) 22:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is stopping you (or the creator) from doing that now, I will also note that if this closes as a redirect then the contents will be available in the prsenet article's history (on delete - it is gone. Redirect keeps the version history).Icewhiz (talk) 22:49, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep definitely isn't an option. Not even close to passing the WP:GNG, outside of the WP:BIO1E threshold. Not adverse to a redirect, which it should be, except an editor decided to waste a lot of time by reverting the redirect with no explanation, hence creating an AfD discussion on a clear case of WP:BIO1E. And has been pointed out above the WP:OSE argument in this case is incredibly weak. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:18, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Onel5969 Gene93k Icewhiz I want to transfer the article to my sandbox to retain all existing attribution of edits and any future attribution of edits. Please do not assume I will be the only editor writing on this article. I will need to transfer this page to User:Mitchumch/sandbox1. Even if this article does not go to article space, there is no harm in transferring it to my sandbox. Mitchumch (talk) 14:19, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See - [7] - I attributed the two authors who actually added content.Icewhiz (talk) 14:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ask you to do that nor did I give you permission to add that to my sandbox. Please have an administrator remove it. Mitchumch (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]