< 16 October 18 October >
Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the topic is not notable and for article deletion. North America1000 01:15, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Once Upon a Time opening sequences[edit]

List of Once Upon a Time opening sequences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe a list of the opening sequences of this show is of encyclopedic value. I find no coverage of this topic in reliable sources, thus failing the notability requirements for standalone lists. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:22, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:35, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE per low participation herein. North America1000 01:18, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sik K[edit]

Sik K (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable South Korean rapper. None of the 4 sources in the article establish notability. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:30, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Galluzzo[edit]

Rob Galluzzo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources do not support subjects notability. Additional reliable sources could not be located. Note notable enough for a WP:BLP Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 04:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article from The Australian is a cover section, with a photo of Rob Galluzo, along with several direct quotes about the project and his philosophy of work.

The article from the Sydney Morning Herald also features a photo (although it is archived) and has direct quotes.

These are significant Australian media outlets.

The Berlin International Film Festivale is one of the most prestigious festivals in the world. To have a dramatic film accepted for competition and as a premiere is a significant achievement in the film and entertainment world.

Warbler21 (talk) 05:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

added additional news and industry coverage on Galluzzo and reformatted to include more of the key career moments to make the article more clear. should have started in the sandbox - now understand the process better. cheers. Warbler21 (talk) 19:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Maddox, Garry (2012-04-12). "The true story behind the man with big feet". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2016-09-26.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  18:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. As a result of a misclick on my part, I speedied it per A1, as it was tagged. I meant to change the rationale to A3 (no content) or G1 (patent nonsense), since "LL" hardly qualifies as content, and WP:CSD#A1 says, "If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate." The subject is apparently a real upcoming TV show, but this "article" contained no content about it. Deor (talk) 19:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Married to Medicine: Houston[edit]

Married to Medicine: Houston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Straight out vandalism Eric S.V. (talk) 16:57, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep considering the technicalities of the nominator targeting specific articles when the nominator has now been uncovered as being a past advertising-only account, now using a second account (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:56, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May D[edit]

May D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom's a sock and has been blocked so closing as SK, No objections to renomination by anyone in good standing. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:17, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Pizzle[edit]

Jay Pizzle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep as a technicality considering this nominator has been uncovered as being the same user of a past advertising-only account and has apparently targeted specific articles for deletion as a rampage (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fliptyce[edit]

Fliptyce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted. (non-admin closure) Citobun (talk) 15:36, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LouišP[edit]

LouišP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion tag removed. Non-notable startup, no references to reliable secondary sources. Article created by single-purpose conflict of interest account for promotional purposes, contrary to Wikipedia's WP:NOT policy. Citobun (talk) 12:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close. The page was a redirect that was blanked by an IP. The correct procedure is to restore the redirect and take it to RFD if the redirect should be deleted.. -- GB fan 16:08, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CDisplayEx[edit]

AfDs for this article:
CDisplayEx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This user blanked it, so I'm deleting it. Eric S.V. (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it is a minor program that seems to be bundled with malware and the section that the redirect was referencing has been removed. --Frmorrison (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hashtag United F.C.[edit]

Hashtag United F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little known "YouTube" based football (soccer) club created by a person who hasn't got their own Wiki article. Orphan article, three sources linking from major British news agencies but no major sniffs of notability. Nordic Nightfury 10:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Nordic Nightfury 10:03, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Dag Bladet, Norway
  2. La Opinion, USA
Fenix down (talk) 16:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:52, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Coachway[edit]

Reading Coachway (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable coach interchange, This had been moved to Calcot Coachway however I've reverted but anyway that aside, There's nothing at all on this coach station and the only sources in the article are IKEA store locations, Sainsburys store locations and a few bus timetables, Can't find any evidence of notability on Google News, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 22:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Davey2010 Is this by any chance equivalent to a "bus interchange" (something like this and this), where multiple buses start and terminate? Because interchanges might be considered notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Searching "coachway uk" on Google only returns images of actual coaches, I'm assuming they more or less look like that in the layout but it wouldn't be that busy/packed, I don't think these are start and terminate for coaches tho - I think it's just a normal bus stop for coaches and reading the article I think only one bus terminates here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:03, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ah I see. Thank you for the explanation. This looks like a normal bus stop (maybe slightly bigger in size), but still just a normal stop. I will stick with my delete then. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 09:41, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Causeway Classic. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Causeway Carriage[edit]

Causeway Carriage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

redundant and unnecessary because of Causeway Classic Joeykai (talk) 05:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I put the non-overlapping info from the Carriage's page onto the game's page, so the article is ready to be be deleted Brholden 3 October 2016

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:12, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:40, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic Nightfury 09:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 23:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rhys James[edit]

Rhys James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I still confirm my PROD, as these sources added are simply only interviews, triviality and other unconvincing sources; there is no inherited notability from simply appearing at some shows and events. SwisterTwister talk 16:25, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks aside, I'll note I actually searched at local news media and am only finding interviews and other unconvincing sources (also then not including some of the ones listed as it is). SwisterTwister talk 16:39, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America1000 03:58, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of populated places in New Mexico by population[edit]

List of populated places in New Mexico by population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems pretty redundant. We already have List of municipalities in New Mexico which includes population for all cities, towns, and villages. We also have List of census-designated places in New Mexico which includes all census designated places and unincorporated communities. This third list is completely redundant. We can add population numbers to the latter, but it doesn't make sense to have 3 lists for the same thing. This page was chosen as redundant since it is an orphan article, no page on wikipedia links here. Mattximus (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:27, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the great comments. I'll response to each one.

1. Yes there is some merit to having a list that combines the two other lists, however New Mexico would then be an odd one out. The reason there is a division between incorporated and unincorporated is sheer numbers for most states, and that they are quite different politically. The lists would often be thousands if we combined both. All states have a list of incorporated places (this can be list of cities, municipalities, cities and towns, etc...) and one list of unincorporated places (CDPs). There is no real source or citation for unincorporated non-CDP that I'm aware of and none are included here anyway.

2. Maybe I'm lost but I clicked on a random page that it says links to it, Grant County, New Mexico, but could not find the link. In fact I haven't found a single page with the link to this list.

3. A few states have this, but it's by no means normal. But all states have the two main lists: incorporated and unincorporated. This would be anomalous as far as I can tell. I wonder why New Mexico gets one, but say Alabama, Alaska, or Arkansas doesn't.

My main argument is that the data is repeated 100% in 2 other lists, that are better maintained. It is completely, 100% redundant content wise.

Thanks for your input! Mattximus (talk) 23:39, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: #2, this page is included in Template:New Mexico and so is linked to every article that uses that template. So not an orphan at all. postdlf (talk) 13:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well the main point is that all the information is 100% duplicated, and this page is an orphan... so it's not useful. Mattximus (talk) 21:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See above; not an orphan. postdlf (talk) 13:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for linking me to the template. I've updated the template replacing the link with the format of other states (one for municipalities, one for unincorporated places). So now I do believe it is an orphan. Mattximus (talk) 23:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 01:21, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue 911 (pinball)[edit]

Rescue 911 (pinball) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

questionable notability Prisencolin (talk) 07:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

–::Strong Keep. It is not only a real pinball machine but has also been released as video game for several platforms. --Tochni (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tochni: Can you find any reliable sources that cover this? Otherwise it sounds like it should be notable if what you're claiming is true.--Prisencolin (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is availabe on Steam: http://store.steampowered.com/app/394560/ on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/FarSight-Studios-Pinball-Arcade/dp/B0084HDG8Y itunes: https://itunes.apple.com/de/app/pinball-arcade-free/id497189134?mt=8 Play Store: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.farsight.AndroidPinball.javaProject https://pinballsupernova.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/the-pinball-arcade-releases-premier-technologys-rescue-911-game-play-released-and-video/ http://www.norrispinball.com/blog/?p=125 http://www.truetrophies.com/n7953/the-pinball-arcade-rescue-911-table-revealed.htm http://www.jeuxpcmag.com/actus/34438-rescue-911-arrive-sur-pinball-arcade

It would be the only article of all pinball articles linked from The Pinball Arcade that gets deleted and would make it totally incomplete. It would be very demotivating for me to write anything for the Wikipedia project Pinball and it seems I am currently the only pinball expert who writes for Wikipedia. Perhaps I will even stop to write anything again for Wikipedia if it useless to write about Pinball machines although it is such interesting topic which includes design, history, gaming, economy, media and so on. --Tochni (talk) 18:24, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:40, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:28, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Bodega[edit]

Ms. Bodega (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

subject fails MUSICBIO. Search results only bring up promotional and download-related contents about her songs except this this which I think isn't enough to establish notability. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@JK1286W:,the sources you cited point to one headline of her songs being inspired by Fela. It is obvious the artist hasn't been discussed extensively by reliable secondary sources to establish notability, aside the headline. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:06, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jamzy4:, how do you improve an article that lacks in-depth details from reliable sources? Possible? —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 20:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Oluwa2Chainz:According to this discussion, you provided one references, which is Vanguard newspaper. Wikipedia believe that Local and International newspaper are notable, content which i also believe. The subject article those not need to be on few Newspaper online site to prove notability. The article subject also has won an award which is Nigeria Entertainment Awards and a references, which makes the article to meets WP:MUSICBIO to my understanding. I believe this article can be improve instead to be deleted. According to my investigation, the user who created this article is a newcomer. He or she needs to know more about writing an article on wikipedia before moving to main space thank you.
That reference is an interview and nothing more. By the way, the subject has never been nominated or won any major music award. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 18:42, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please don"t accuse me COI, i have explained myself in a polite manners.--Jamzy4 (talk) 17:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 19:55, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:45, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Zinavoy[edit]

Henry Zinavoy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author per WP:AUTHOR or WP:BIO. Absolutely zero coverage in reliable sources. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 07:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:47, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Ascher[edit]

Paul Ascher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i think that the iron cross first class is not notable as per wp:soldier as it was not the nazi germany's highest award for valor which is Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross

I think that it also fails notability as Paul aschers rank was not a flag, general or air officer, as per wp:soldier The only reason to keep is that Paul ascher may have Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign However this was never referenced in the article ever and i cannot find a suitable reference.

Perhaps an other editor can find a reference or a rationale to keep otherwise i say delete

On retrospect this may be a suitable reference http://www.kbismarck.com/crew/paulascher.html i am still a new user and learning please ping me if this is a suitable reference Sassmouth (talk) 06:10, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:43, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Toupin[edit]

Jerry Toupin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I came across this as an A7 nomination, however the claim of the author having a bestselling book would be enough to barely squeak by notability guidelines. The sources on the page are unusable to establish notability, as one is to an e-commerce site (which shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all) and the other is a WP:PRIMARY source, Toupin's YouTube channel.

A search didn't bring up much - I found this mention in a book put out by Laval University, however since Toupin graduated from the school, it'd be well within their best interests to write about him. Now this looks to be usable, but I didn't really find anything else to establish Toupin's notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
COI self-promotion, if you check the creator's username. Bearcat (talk) 20:21, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:40, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Hoven[edit]

Dick Hoven (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is an unsourced BLP that I suspect to be a hoax. If it is not a hoax, the person certainly fails notability tests. It had a prod tag on it, which was removed despite the PROD template's statement that says the articles needed "at least one reference to a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article." The sources in the article failed this basic test. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:19, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete (by RHaworth) per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 15:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PAN AIR[edit]

PAN AIR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, "logo" is a MSPaint job. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:17, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:38, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaNiyah Bailey[edit]

LaNiyah Bailey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed here with the sole basis of choosing AfD instead, I still confirm my PROD as it still applies and clearly states everything of concerns here. SwisterTwister talk 21:42, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Nordic Nightfury 07:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dugu Miniautotoys[edit]

Dugu Miniautotoys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article reads as WP:OR and among the 100 or so unique ghits I get nothing that looks like a reliable source. There are sources cited, but these are not about the subject. Guy (Help!) 12:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I checked one of the cited sources at random. The Gibson book does indeed talk about Dugu models on page 49 (and other pages):
https://books.google.com.au/books?id=87Rm_p6WUccC&dq=%22Model+Veteran+and+Vintage+Cars%22&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=dugu
Across many other car model articles I have noted that user Cstevencampbell is a careful and methodical editor, not prone to making things up and not prone to inaccuracies.  Stepho  talk  14:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dugu toys was a pioneer brand in the classic and veteran age toy modeling. It led the way to the greater success of other more popular brands like Solido (in its later classic lines) Rio Models and Brumm. To delete the article would cause a Wikipedia gap in the understanding of the development of toy and collectible miniature automobiles. Unfortunately, not all important subjects have a lot written about them in books, though I am continually on the lookout for better sources. --Cstevencampbell (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:08, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:35, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:22, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Several references (linked to article parenthetically) have been added. I notice some I referenced but had never added ! I would say three are very strong references from books of noted experts on toy cars (Richardson and Ralston). A couple of others were supporting sites.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Several more references (Spano and Force) have been added to the article, which now is much better cited and referenced.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 00:45, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rexx Pincode[edit]

Rexx Pincode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

self created article about a subject who has same name as the creator. the article fails WP:BASIC and WP:MUSICBIO —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:52, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unremarkable musician with only trivial mentions to his songs. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, etc. Darreg (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mario Mantese[edit]

Mario Mantese (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 01:51, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:08, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Female Autobots. Consensus for a redirect to Female Autobots (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 20:44, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moonracer[edit]

Moonracer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor Transformers character. No evidence of real-world notability. Josh Milburn (talk) 01:39, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

T For Temple U[edit]

T For Temple U (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable school song (neither asserted in article nor likely to exist based on its genre and other details). DMacks (talk) 01:32, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:33, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel C. Weingarten[edit]

Rachel C. Weingarten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability and this article reads as a promotional piece. Subverted (talk • contribs) 01:28, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Transformers characters. Consensus is that no independent article is needed for this character. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 20:37, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swindle (Transformers)[edit]

Swindle (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Dane2007 talk 20:34, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seyed Ali Asghar Dastgheib[edit]

Seyed Ali Asghar Dastgheib (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks coverage in reliable sources Meatsgains (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More