The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep as a technicality considering this nominator has been uncovered as being the same user of a past advertising-only account and has apparently targeted specific articles for deletion as a rampage (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 03:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fliptyce[edit]

Fliptyce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Am afraid this might be a Conflict of interest. Account creation of this article looks like a sockpuppets of Coal Press Nation who have created

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.