![]() |
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability; no third-party sources whatsoever; does not meet WP:MUSIC. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is an essentially unreferenced (the only ELs are examples) stub on a type of internet quiz that fails WP:GNG due to a lack of coverage in reliable sources. --BDD (talk) 23:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable college a capella. Fails WP:BAND: Only self-published albums. No record deal. Only minor awards. Occasionally sings at baseball games. GrapedApe (talk) 22:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable journalist. One lucky interview (of someone who might be a relative or friend based on comments on the original interview site) gets published, and one interview of the subject at a fantasy sport site. Nothing there yet. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC) WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Farid Khan is a well known tennis player and sports journalist from Pakistan. He took the interview of Aqeel Khan, who is Pakistan's No. 1 Tennis Player. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeeshanRehman1 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 9 June 2013 (UTC) — ZeeshanRehman1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
wait wait wait who said farid khan is not notable? ask here in pakistan he is the most talented and aspiring journalist in pakistan very young and improving day by day he's a tennis player as well don't delete his page — Preceding unsigned comment added by YasirKhan1 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC) — YasirKhan1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Comment: There seem to be two articles about the same subject: Farid 'Bronze Medalist' Khan and Farid Khan (journalist). - David Biddulph (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: A number of editors (or perhaps one editor using a number of accounts) are repeatedly deleting the AFD tag from the article before the AFD discussion is complete. I don't know whether they think that this will prevent deletion if the AFD concludes that this is the appropriate action. - David Biddulph (talk) 11:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion is useless. He is very famous man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.127.154 (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
he is very notables. many interviews taken and may awards won. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.77.131 (talk) 22:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 02:56, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Most, if not all of the references utilized in the article are actually what you could call reliable. Most are derisive passing mentions, links to the product website, articles from another wiki (mind you, after research I found out developers maintain it, so it's a grey area.), and a dead link to presumably a Wells Fargo blog post. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 19:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested by the article's creator on the grounds that he will captain the Iraqi team at the Youth World Cup. Events are never grounds for notability until the actually occur per WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:NSPORT explicitly excludes youth football as a source notability. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks in-depth coverage in WP:Reliable sources. Has appeared on TV a few times, but not yet notable enough per WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENTERTAINER. Prod contested by article's creator. Captain Conundrum (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page about a Youtube-only award run by subject, article created by same editor, two-page WP:Walled garden, similarly making no assertion of notability per WP:GNG, with no significant coverage from WP:Reliable sources:
The result was Speedy Delete. Danger High voltage! 19:39, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This page should be deleted because Pimp posts are not notable and may even be a hoax or a name coined by one person. I would have speedied it under A7, but I was reluctant to (even though it was web content). Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 18:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Notability of this award is not clear. References provided in the article are either primary or questioning the recipients of the award. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Also a lot of red links for the recipients of the award itself. RadioFan (talk) 18:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he has played in the AFC cup, an assertion not supported by reliable sources that does not confer notability as it would have been for a non-fully-pro club. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Iranian languages#Comparison table. (non-admin closure) czar · · 03:39, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is original research - see citation #1, which reads "My own research based on severe Kurdish and Persian resources (own language literature, dictionaries, web researches)". Obviously the creator has put a lot of work in here, but Wikipedia doesn't publish original research. Also, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information - this is very likely all true and done in good faith, but that doesn't mean it belongs. The author even says the words were chosen randomly. Delete, as nominator. Cheers, Dawn Bard (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
New Zealand based anti shark fin advocacy group. Does not seem to meet WP:CORP, with no in-depth coverage. Directory listing at best. Page sources are either passing mentions or are there just to promote cause. Funny Pika! 16:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Author made in good faith; possible test page, not all the people listed are notable. smileguy91talk 16:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of SpongeBob SquarePants characters. LFaraone 01:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft. No out of universe notability. JJ98 (Talk) 15:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
The result was Redirect. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Subject appears to not be notable as an army officer, businessman or politician and the page appears to be little more than a promotional resumé/life story, with links provided to the businesses he supposedly runs in the lead. The article has no third-party sources and seems to have been mostly written by a series of SPAs with a presumed connection to the subject, such as Saxoncongress (talk · contribs), Samanthajose (talk · contribs) and GaDawg2011 (talk · contribs). He appears to have some limited coverage in news media around the time of a failed congressional bid in 2008, but nothing much else of any substance. N-HH talk/edits 15:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Created by a user who's only contributed to this article and unref'd for over six years. I can't find any sources to indicate notability Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 14:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Has no sources, has biased language, doesn't appear to be a landmark case as it claims. Looking for better sources, or someone who is an expert on cases to decide whether this was a landmark case or not. If neither can be found then it should be deleted. Countered (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. LFaraone 01:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOT, this is a news story, there is no lasting encyclopedic significance to this event. LGA talkedits 11:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted and redirected post-delete. Considering this article was originally created by a community-banned sockmaster (who had issues with copyvios and the like for exactly these kinds of articles), I don't think there's any real reason to keep the article history. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Only a single ref, without page numbers. Google searches show many social media uses and offers of prints but no in depth coverage. Notability is not inherited from the artist. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The article creator has blanked the article, essentially qualifying it for speedy deletion (WP:CSD#G7) and there is a clear consensus in the discussion here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possible neologism and OR, not supported by any RSes. Only mention of "Australian Theater of Operations" "World War II" in Google Books is this, which uses it as part of the American-British-Dutch-Australian Command's title. South West Pacific theatre of World War II already covers the area around Oceania and Australia. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. WP:SNOW. postdlf (talk) 05:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Most of this article appears to be based on a self-published book by the author. There are no reliable independent sources in the article or that I can find using Google search to establish any notability. I am One of Many (talk) 07:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
freshacconci talktalk 13:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Somewhat promotional article for company of very borderline notability. I think the refs are not substantial or independent enough to show notability by our usual standards, and the article is somewhat exaggerated in its claims of importance from the numbers of people who use sites to which it has some very indirect connection.Previous versions were speedied as A7,but they provided much less information; I think the best course will be a community decision here. DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, not even an English release. Tyros1972 Talk 07:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. patent nonsense LFaraone 01:20, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Contesting Speedy and opening an AfD. I think the article has merit but certainly needs work. Tyros1972 Talk 07:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(UTC)
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable. Tyros1972 Talk 07:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deletion G11. (Non-admin closure) AllyD (talk) 16:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not in English (needs translation) and has no RS. Unknown if it is notable. Tyros1972 Talk 07:00, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable web-comic character; article does not assert notability, and even if the webcomic was notable, there is not reason the single character should have its own article(in my opinion). — Dædαlus+ Contribs 04:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure). Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He didn't really do anything. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 02:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw the deletion nomination. My Mistake.Ghostboy1997 (talk) 03:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No valid references. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 02:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:21, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Was deleted at AFD but recreated via AFC, then G4. Opinion in a DRV was split about endorsing the close Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 June 1 with arguments about promotional language and concern over the validity of new sourcing being expressed.As the DRV was closed as relist. As the closer of the DRV, I am neutral. Spartaz Humbug! 01:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. LFaraone 01:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Song has not been released as a single and is not an exceptionally prominent song from the album. It is mentioned that the song was a worldwide hit in the article but that is not sourced. Already, Shakira articles are not faring well and more unnecessary articles will not help. WonderBoy1998 (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus seems to be that the Urban X Award for Biggest Ass in Porn is not sufficient for demonstrating notability. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:53, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable porn actress. References are mostly primary in nature or PR items. Someone needs to chime in concerning the importance of the Urban X award. Vanity page. reddogsix (talk) 01:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:50, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable trailer park. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 00:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 00:01, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]