The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:57, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mirkot[edit]

I withdraw the deletion nomination. My Mistake.Ghostboy1997 (talk) 03:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mirkot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No valid references. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 02:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - this article about a village now has a reference. It took me minutes to find one, and you don't nominate an article for AFD because you couldn't find a reference. Please withdraw the nomination. Captain Conundrum (talk) 02:23, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. —Mikemoral♪♫ 02:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Longstanding consensus accepts the notability of populated places such as villages, unless a hoax is involved. Wikipedia has some of the features of a gazetteer, per the Five pillars. Mikemoral has added a source - thanks. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:56, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.