The result was keep. causa sui (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable board game. I have not been able to find any significant, direct, detailed coverage of this topic in secondary sources. The PROD-tag was removed without explanation by Colonel Warden (talk · contribs) – which seems rather impolite but no more so than I've come to expect. ╟─TreasuryTag►First Secretary of State─╢ 18:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was incubate (Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Nephilim (film)). Please feel free to create an appropriate redirect in place of the article. Material in the incubator can be used in other articles, provided there is proper attribution. Mkativerata (talk) 07:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Film is in pre-production. WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 23:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to David O. Russell#Nailed. Spartaz Humbug! 08:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Film was shut down before production ended. All major cast and director have moved on. WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 23:46, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:19, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable Might and Magic fancruft. Despite my very best efforts and an extensive search through web archives, couldn't find a single third-party source on them, reliable or otherwise. --Monere (talk) 23:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Institution of Mechanical Engineers are collectively the editors of this journal, SAGE Publications are the publishers (using their brand MetaPress), Web of Science and Web of Knowledge are brands of Thomson Reuters which is in a re-seller relationship with Sage / IMechE, Journal Citation Reports is a service of Thomson Reuters. User:AntonV is a paid employee of SAGE. Given these commercial links, my contention is that no references from any of these sources meets the requirements Independent of the subject requirement of WP:GNG. By this measure this page has no references. My further contention is that linking to content in Web of Science / Web of Knowledge (a million+ page website hidden behind complex paywalls) using only a link to the homepage is entirely inappropriate referencing behavior. The page creator (and only significant contributor) has previously defended his editing based on Wikipedia:Notability_(academic_journals) (see my talk page) which as it says in the header has not been accepted as a Wikipedia policy or guideline. I have googled for references, but the use of the name in references makes it very hard to found sources about the journal. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable person, the only reliable source I can find about him says he was an unused sub for a football team in a semi-pro league. His name is not mentioned on the cast of any of the productions listed on the article. Quasihuman | Talk 22:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A vanity article about a non-notable high school athlete and teen performer. And Adoil Descended (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 05:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails the requirements of WP:Notability (music) as it relates to individual songs. Limited independent reliable sources relating directly to the song. Most mentions are either trivial or blog related. Song has not come close to charting. Nor does it meet any other of the requirements for having a separate article. Most of the article data belongs and should be placed in the artist's article. Note that the ABC News reports cannot be considered as reliable sources as ABC has been heavily promoting the artist and thus is not an independent source. The other source given is a promotional site. The artist herself is of dubious notability, but I will wait for the results of the AfD on this song, before going into the subject of the artist herself. Delete. Safiel (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional article for a magazine of questionable notability. Article creator has a clear WP:COI - article previously speedied as advertising. Google search on "New You Magazine" shows a lot of hits, but little coverage from reliable sources - most are primary sources, press releases, blogs, subscription, or sales links. Google news search shows no results. MikeWazowski (talk) 21:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No wide coverage of this recently launced planning code. Doubtfull if it is important enough for a encyclopedia because it looks rather promotional. Night of the Big Wind talk 21:24, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 20:57, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A pedagogical tool being promoted by its creator. No evidence that anyone else uses it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. A7 Ronhjones (Talk) 20:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that WP:NMUSIC is met. Claims to be a "top ten producer" bu there are no sources to back it up. SmartSE (talk) 19:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Courcelles 20:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of citations and tone issues CartoonDiablo (talk) 18:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Courcelles 20:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable board game. I have not been able to find any significant, direct, detailed coverage of this topic in secondary sources. The PROD-tag was removed without explanation by Colonel Warden (talk · contribs) – which seems rather impolite but no more so than I've come to expect. ╟─TreasuryTag►Counsellor of State─╢ 18:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 18:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article is a biography of a living musician that does not meet notability. I am unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Whpq (talk) 17:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 20:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No notability evident in the article; PROD was disputed by article creator. I'm not finding anything useful for sourcing or notability in an (English, as unfortunately I don't read Japanese) google search. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:FILMMAKER; no coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Speedy deletion per db-repost was declined on the grounds that the article had substantially changed, but there's still no indication of notability here. Gurt Posh (talk) 14:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related article, because it likewise offers no indication of notability per Wikipedia:Notability (films), and has no coverage online from WP:Reliable sources:
The result was delete. Courcelles 20:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
An article about a musician who appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. The article used to have some references but I removed them because they pointed to non-reliable sources ([15]). Rymatz (talk) 13:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 20:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-encyclopaedic essay of opinion per WP:No original research, and WP:Synthesis, POV advocacy for an idea. Prod contested by anonymous editor. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Courcelles 20:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence film has ever entered production. WP:NF. BOVINEBOY2008 11:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Sandstein 06:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Retailer (redirect to Retail. Si Trew (talk) 11:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Userfy. Black Kite (t) (c) 15:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence the film was ever release. No notable coverage. BOVINEBOY2008 11:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 12:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This page has been blanked as a courtesy. |
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 12:08, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ephemeral project. No independent sources. Does not meet WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 10:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 18:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced BLP since 2009. Can't seem to find any RS relating to him through Google, but some of the claims here seemed to prompt closer examination than a BLP prod. Dweller (talk) 10:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 12:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"great Islamic saint who lived in the Indian subcontinent". No sources in article, and can find no reliable ones. Christopher Connor (talk) 09:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin close) While some cleanup is in order, clearly no consensus to delete. BusterD (talk) 11:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:IINFO no inclusion criteria, it seems to be mainly a list of Scottish stuff. Also of the references I checked about 20 in total not one of them supports the idea of the person/place or thing being an icon but rather simply excising and being scottish Gnevin (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 18:15, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Prod notice removed without reason (along wiht BLP tags) by IP. Unreferenced BLP since 2009. Couldn't find anything on Google that wasn't Wikipedia mirror. Also, no article on spanish Wikipedia, which might have helped. Dweller (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:17, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The wife of someone notable - unworthy of her own article - some contentious uncited also in the article - templated uncited since ten months - If someone can assert she really exists and was married to him then I support a deletion and then a protected redirect to stop this article being recreated, if not then delete and salt. I notice the detail about her is in Hassan II article but it is uncited there as far as I can see - anyway this person is not wiki notable and shouldn't have a BLP here. WP:NOTINHERITED - Off2riorob (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 22:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
-->
The (possibly imprisoned?) mother of the current king whose brother attempted to kill King Hasan II is a non-notable...? ...and Iron Man's enemy "Whiplash" isn't? You guys are beyond laughable with all your little codes - it's breathtaking. "Wikipedia is Second Life for Corporations" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.249.45.36 (talk) 17:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 12:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I find no matches in GNews or GBooks and the article fails to make a case against the criteria of WP:AUTHOR. It seems unlikely that reliable sources to demonstrate the impact required will be added in the near future. Though http://www.paisano-online.com appears in the page history (not in the version at the time of nomination), this is a student-run weekly newspaper circulated on campus, which would not address impact. PROD removed, along with all prior improvement tags, so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 07:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Paul Simon. v/r - TP 20:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Was deleted in a previous AFD, but there was no quorum and closed by Cirt, so one user suggested it deserved another AFD. causa sui (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Subject has questionable notability, no Google news hits on subject, cited sources are vague, article may have been created by subject Jweiss11 (talk) 05:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 03:53, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Has not debuted professionally, he has only appeared in a youth tournament not a senior tournament. It also fails WP:NFOOTY GoPurple'nGold24 03:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. joe deckertalk to me 03:54, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Serious concerns about notability and verifiability. —Emufarmers(T/C) 02:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin close) While "we should not dismiss the subject's concerns out-of-hand", the BLP subject's wishes can't figure overmuch in the weighing of sources or notability. Several editors make the case notability and verifiability were assessed in successful A-class or FA review. No consensus to delete or merge. Fairly clear consensus to keep. BusterD (talk) 12:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am the original creator of this page and later successfully nominated it for Featured Article. Upon review of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide#People, however, this individual does not appear to meet WP's standards for notability of a military person. The event for which he was most known was for being captain of a battleship upon which occurred one of the worst peacetime maritime disasters in the US Navy. He, however, does not appear to have been directly responsible for the accident. His career and life since the accident don't appear to be particularly noteworthy. Cla68 (talk) 02:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 20:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Unable to locate significant coverage in reliable sources that would suggest notability. Cybercobra (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per G7. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rather unencyclopedic, subjective article. Is there some objective classification of 'erotically shaped'? If there were is this a subject notable for inclusion in an encyclopedia? No and no. Prodego talk 01:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 20:06, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
List based on personal opinion. Inclusion on this list, especially fiction entries, is debatable at best and original research at worst. Comprised mostly of red links to articles that likely wont meet notability WP:NBOOKS RadioFan (talk) 17:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 00:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N? Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which evidence the notability of this Bangladeshi singer. While I attempted Bngladeshi searching as well as English, I recognize the language challenge, additional sources welcomed as always. joe deckertalk to me 16:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. v/r - TP 20:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced biography, looks like it has been written by a family member. Notability per WP:NMG seems dubious. bender235 (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. (non-admin close) Discussion has revealed precedent of etymologies as notable enough to support a WikiProject. Retaining and improving such a list is common practice. No consensus to delete. BusterD (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Etymologies belong in a dictionary, delete per WP:NOT#DICT Gnevin (talk) 13:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Lear's Fool 06:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
also nominating:
another sprawling series of non notable sporting results. almost all of the participants are non notable. women's kickboxing gets far less coverage than men's coverage and thus dismally fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 03:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable due to lack of notable coverage on internet (most hits are booksellers). Night of the Big Wind talk 02:49, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
another non notable sporting result that fails WP:GNG. one notable fighter does not cut it. fails WP:EVENT also. LibStar (talk) 00:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. We do not accept unsourced WP:BLPs. Sandstein 06:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Notability. Unable to find wp:rs to satisfy wp:creative. Note failed speedy long ago. Ariconte (talk) 23:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Listed for 21 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find any independant sources to confer notability for this author. Angryapathy (talk) 19:52, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]