![]() | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on October 25, 2015. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for ((copyedit)). The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Merge proposal |
Good effort. I'm glad that this page has been created. I've created a similar page back in August and some people teamed up to delete it. anyway now after release of his movie there's enough reliable evideance and no one can delete this off simply they don't like him. But they should always remeber an article is an info about something or someone eventhough it's not always good things Gopaalan 13:42, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Someone deleting entries due to jealousy towards Santhosh Pandit. The following lines were removed 2 times. "Some major newspapers and channels of India published news articles about Santhos Pandit and his movie 'Krishnanum Radhayum". This is a fact and it is supported by references. If anybody is going to delete, please give valid reasons for deletion. Byal,Bangalore October 25, 2011. 3:52pm (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byal (talk • contribs)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Some information about santhosh pandit is completely wrong. The last edited person is not added anything yet. Shidhincr (talk) 13:22, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Santhosh Pandit to Santhosh Pandit(Actor) as he was an actor in Malayalam film industry and his debut attempt was talked, appreciated and criticized in Kerala through the social networking sites and electronic and print media. Don't delete this page Shobinjoseph (talk) 17:37, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Currently, this article is being considered for deletion. Please specify what is the reason for deletion. Wikipedia clearly mentions the criteria for deletion? Please spend 2 minutes to read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons. Then kindly give a valid reason for deletion. Please do not use Wikipedia for personal interests — Preceding unsigned comment added by Byal (talk • contribs) 08:14, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
59.97.25.99 (talk) 07:56, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
More about Santhosh Panditji: http://wwwambareeshymc.blogspot.com/2011/10/santhosh-pandit-gods-own-man.html
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
202.164.150.75 (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2011 (UTC)santosh is divorced
Santhosh Pandit is clearly a well known notable person. Type in Google nearly 5 million hits proves his clear notability. He may have established notability through negative publicities. (I am writing from Australia [119.12.156.218]. I did not know this person until someone throws rotten eggs and tomatoes on him.) However that does not warrant an article to be deleted. Additionally, I see that well known Kerala newspaper Malayala Maonorama has published heaps of articles about him. He also got lots of money from youtube and recently been awarded for his performance. So we could talk more and more about this guy. 119.12.156.218 (talk) 05:50, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Someone verify the website, i dont think its a official one. So many site are there for the traffic only.. Rahulpattuvam talk 16:34, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
www.santoshpanditofficial.com
Nishasushant (talk) 19:55, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. --Ella Plantagenet (talk) 00:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
How can wikipedia remove the article about a person who was only second to facebook in google trends on nov 5th 2011 and searched in google from 5 different countries with the country of his birth coming only fifth in the list,I find it very strange.I think since he is a new phenomenon and was relatively unknown till now authentic sources of information will take time to come.
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (he is as or more notable than Vinayan, Mohanlal etc ) --Peopledowhattheyoughttodo (talk) 16:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (The topic covered is a phenomenal success in the Indian state of Kerala. you may modify it. But please do not delete it) --122.169.124.134 (talk) 17:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --183.83.179.91 (talk) 18:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
this is not true. his film is not capable of winning any award. in fact it is a disaster.
Santosh Pandit's page should not be deleted... In future he is going to achieve Guinness Record too.. so be kool, also even his name is deleted from wikipedia, no worries, He will be a Real Hero... coz we are not sure of Wikipedia's safe survival a head, coz of Donation appeal ideas from Wikipedia.
Shame to all, those who cant digest a man to see winning... He is a descent man with positive attitude, he tried his level best to make a movie without any professional knowledge. Only with Indian currency or Rs. 5 Lakh... and that movie was a hit, by any means...
He is an intelligent person, he already proved it... Its true that, he is not that much handsome, he also admit that... but we should encourage him.
Even Super Star Amitabh's too struggled a lot in the earlier stage... ;-)
Criticizer mind it : Those who do not SURPRISE on Good things, will never make anything to Surprise Others ;-)
Best wishes Santosh Pandit.. Carry on...!!!
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --86.99.222.95 (talk) 19:32, 22 November 2011 (UTC) this guy does not deserve to be in wikipedia. he is an infamous actor known for his utter poor skills! please delete his page asap! thanks
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --83.96.64.93 (talk) 21:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
prson is very bad mentality .. he is doing all this for getting undue attention
This page should not be speedily deleted because...
I have listed the argument of the deletion proposer and my counter arguments below:
Austria156: This article may have been previously nominated for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Pandit exists.
My argument against: Previous nomination for deletion was before his movie release which is the major event that gave him the notability.
Austria156: Subject notable only for one event.
My argument against: He is the major player in that major event which gives him notability. The fact that the event is major is evident from:
Austria156: That too the event was a film, produced, written, directed and acted-in by the very person who himself leased theatres to screen it as well.
My argument against) Notability in the movie industry is not a reason for deletion.
Austria156: Fame built-up through deliberate infamy.
My argument against) Being infamous is also not a reason for deletion.
User:Austria156: But I dont think the encyclopedia built and nurtured by the people of the world is the right place for this.
My argument against: This en.wikipedia reviewer is being elitist here. Wikipedia hosts entries for Al Capone, Hitler and Nathuram Godse as well.
--Cibu (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Dead admins and deletion taggers, Please do not speedy this page via CSD G4. The last deletion discussion happened in July. Since then the subject has released a movie and has been given widespread media coverage. Hence take the article to AfD rather than using CSD G4 or A7 -- Raziman T V (talk) 05:45, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Santhosh Pandit has made enough newsworthiness and history by daring to stir whirlpools in one of the significant language portfolio of Indian film industry (Malayalam) at a time that portfolio itself faces threats to its successful and economic survival. By going through unconventional steps and measures he has opened the eyes of mainstream movie makers and artists forcing them to retrospect their own perceptions of quality and acceptability.
The acts of this person is sure to become a historical landmark of Malayalam movie industry. Even the corroboration about deletion of this article would go a long way in the history of Wikipedia as what constitutes useful and relevant information in an encyclopedia as far as an average Keralite or Malayalee is concerned. ViswaPrabha വിശ്വപ്രഭ (talk) 15:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
--- Response removed by author (Austria156) owing to the following community guidance. ---
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --149.156.110.250 (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC) I think a lot of contestants of Big Boss and other reality shows have managed a place in Wiki for similar fame like Santhosh Pandit. Then why not Santhosh Pandit ?
A bunch of jealous people who want to erase this page.... shame on you.....
This ibn article may help you. The article is not talking about the quality of SP's movies. But the howling and abuses created by audience helped the movie and SP so famous, yes the bad and negative publicity helped him so much a notable person. 119.12.156.218 (talk) 07:24, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Santhosh Pandit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
All references to Santosh Pandit on this wikipage should be replaced with Santhosh Pandit, which is the correct spelling of the personality described in this wikipage. The other name Santosh Pandit does not related to Santhosh Pandit and you may like to add a disambiguation notice as well. Thank you. Cyberian-london (talk) 13:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
2023 StanleyJr33 (talk) 07:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)