< 27 January | 29 January > |
---|
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A story concept being promoted by its inventor, Dboje (talk · contribs). Unsurprisingly most of the incoming links were added by Dboje: storytelling, story arc and Fabula and syuzhet. And the addition to Barbara Czarniawska was added by a sock puppet (but I hasten to say that I saw no evidence that it was a sock puppet of Dboje). Has anything changed since the AfD five years ago? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)))[reply]
Should this article be moved to wikiversity?Harrypotter (talk) 08:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Primary and middle schools are not covered by the convention of WP:NHS or the guidelines of Wikipedia:OUTCOMES#Education which advises that this article would need a "clear claim to notability" which it fails to do. Consequently the article fails the policy of WP:ORG and appears unlikely to address notability in the near future. Previously PRODded so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No sources, no evidence of notability, seems to be original research. Some passages can be found verbatim on other websites (e.g. http://tensilegroup.net/products_nuts.htm) so there are likely to be copyright issues too. PROD was removed by the author: PROD reason was "Does not fit notability guidelines. No reputable sources." JamesBWatson (talk) 23:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:51, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable but has minor mentions in some external sites. l'aquatique[talk] 21:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete, This AFD debate is already decided. iam old user of wikipedia from the date of their creation, but due to away for some years.i forget my user name and create new one.i saw this activity; so thought to add my opinion. i will give you hundreds of biographies of living person who is not noteable but still is there in WP. but still this chap is 25% noteable in some areas. if admns desire to be deleted this page. delete straight away..why create this drama of Articles of Deletion. WP vision is to be change day by day due to different school of thoughts. --USLeaks t/c 20:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*** L'Aquatique, as per my point of view i think we can give some time and check whether its improve or not. The notablity question may reflect on different biographies, the reference which is mentioned is reliable on this article. if we can creat some groupism, then transparency factor should be effected. Every WP user have its own judgement, we cannot announced the results from the feedback of few users. i believe some points of notablity is there is this article. rest is up to you or honarable admns of WP.--USLeaks t/c 16:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No serious evidence of notability. Several of the references are links to pages not mentioning Appleton, others are to his own website or other non-independent sources, including promotional sites. There is one very brief piece from a local newspaper, and no other evidence of coverage in independent reliable sources. PROD was removed by an IP with no edits away from this topic. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
merge to kylieThisbites (talk) 04:40, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 03:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged but that is what this appears to be: it was written by User:Harris DC about the Harris County District Clerk. Whilst I commend the author for removing the most peacocky of the content within the article when advised to do so, this still remains an entirely flattering and one-sided profile of a subject whose political career depends on a positive public perception and appears to fall foul of WP:SOAP. Then there is the question of notability: WP:POLITICIAN notes that elected politicians at state level or greater are generally notable, but this is a county post. Not all the refs mention the subject and those that do are doubtful in terms of meeting WP:GNG. I have strong reservations about the article's neurality and there does not appear to be sufficient notability to justify its inclusion. I42 (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Those contributing to the page are new to wikipedia. Athaenara is right in that the guidelines on rules where not initially followed, but that has since ceased after being put on notice by same.
The office answers to 4.3 million tax payers. The office holder was voted in by over half a million voters in the 2010 election (with over 1.2 million people total voting in this race alone). The county is the largest in TX. The DA (district attorney Pat Lykos has her own page, yet without the district clerk to manage the Sheriff and DA's criminal intake PLUS the 74 countywide courts and staff and paperwork/ filings that go withit, she cannot do her job and prosecute any criminals.
It is a farce to say that this position is not notable when the office controls 500 employees and 26.6 million dollars in budget. It is a farce when the district clerk of the largest county in Texas gets elected with more votes than candidate for US senate or Governor in other states like Delaware. I understand that the username was in conflict, but i just picked a name. My goal is to flesh out the existing Harris County website with a note on each of its office holders.
Not sure the editors are aware, but Houston is only one third the size in population of Harris County (and resides almost entirely inside the county). More people voted for District Clerk then for Mayor Annise Parker.--Harris DC (talk) 14:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added three more on point (about--not mentions) mainstream articles and Electoral Summary to show orders of magnitude.--Harris DC (talk) 15:08, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep and improve. Discussion of any possible merger can continue on the article's talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't have anything to do with drafting Ron Paul. It's basically just a summary of his campaigns and short list of supporters. Nothing here that warrants a separate article; any useful content can be merged into the Ron Paul article. NYyankees51 (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Has a few links but they read like paid press releases some are merely trivial coverage or mentions.
Seems to be nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 20:12, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. CSDs G11 and A7 HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vanity promotional entry with no independent third-party sources to verify claims in the article. The "sources" included are entries in web directories, which suffice only to verify the company's existence. It has been tagged since April 2010, and appears to fail WP:CORP. Mindmatrix 19:54, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Complete overly detailed plot transcription for a non-notable cartoon episode. Damiens.rf 19:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to meet notability standards, at least with verifiable references. IMDB is the only source material. The article is repeatedly vandalized with "fluff" material being added or reverted, which makes me think this article is posted and/or maintained by the subject or his buddies. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Sudalai Madan. Consensus is that the content doesn't belong here, but there's also opinion that this could be a reasonable redirect to Sudalai Madan, so I'm deleting and redirecting. —SpacemanSpiff 17:27, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable - no sources found by internet searches except copies under Wiki share licences. Chaosdruid (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete – deleted by User:RHaworth as copyvio. Danger (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)))[reply]
non notable company WuhWuzDat 18:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:57, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural nom. I have no affiliation with this group, and it only caught my eye because I lived in the area for a while. When I came across this on new page patrol, it was all of 3 sentences with no references, and obviously soon to be speedied. I worked on it yesterday to see what I could do to save it, and am the main contributor in its current state. It was speedy tagged yesterday, but the tag was removed by the nom when it became apparent I was still working on it. I've reached out to the creator for any additional info s/he could provide, but have had no response. I would say, from an outside perspective, the main problem is pretty obvious: notability. Anyway, I gave it 24 hours to see if I could improve it further...but this is about the best I can do. Please do not consider this nom a vote one way or the other. David Able 18:36, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for a lack of references that would establish notability. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Ironholds (talk) 04:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
non notable former USMC sergeant. 50% of the external links and references are to his own websites. WuhWuzDat 16:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:LISTCRUFT. A non-notable topic. — Timneu22 · talk 16:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. I think it is reasonable to invoke WP:SNOW at this time. A number of editors have mentioned that the topic could perhaps better exist as Death of Khaled Mohamed Saeed. If so, discussion on that can continue on the talk page. NW (Talk) 02:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
He died, alleged police brutality, pops back in the news today because the release oh his photo in the midst of the recent unrest has fanned the flames a tad. That's it. I initially mistakenly believed he died during the recent Egyptian unrest and attempted a redirect to such, but now I do not feel that is a feasible solution. This is WP:NOTNEWS and WP:BLP1E (though the "L" does not literally apply anymore, the concept is the same). It is worth a sentence or two in the 2011 article that his autopsy photo is causing a bit of a ruckus. Please note that "it is reliably sourced!" is not a valid reason for retention when discussing a person known for one event. If it can be shown that the event (death) itself is exceptionally notable, i.e. similar to the Death of Neda Agha-Soltan, then so be it...and the article can be retooled to address the event rather than the person himself...but IMO this does not rise to anything close in terms of impact and sustained world-wide coverage. Tarc (talk) 15:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Hobit that this seems inflammatory. I would agree that it should be moved to "Death of..." but considering that it is an important part of what the Egyptian world is using to show corruption, the article itself should stay. Also, Mohamed ElBaradei has visited Saeed's family, suggesting that this is still an important issue within the protests. (I've never discussed on the talk page, so I'm sorry if I added my part incorrectly)
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 02:18, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Individual fails WP:BLP1E. He is considered notable only as the attending physician to Gabrielle Giffords in the wake of the 2011 Tucson shooting, as all sources indicate. Muboshgu (talk) 15:22, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable topic, fails WP:N. It has been reported that "71 detainees’ names or aliases were found on computers, hard drives, physical lists of Al Qaeda operatives, or other material seized in raids on Al Qaeda safehouses and facilities." This article throws these 71 names together, no matter whether they come from the physical lists or other material, and labels it a "suspicious list". I hope that "list of suspects" is intended, no indication otherwise is given of what would be "suspicious" about this "list" (which is not really a list at all). The two sources given don't discuss this "list" any further beyond the given quote, and no other reliable, independent, indepth sources are available that would shed more light on this. Fram (talk) 14:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not meet WP:CLUB at all. All references except one in the article are from minor publications, and by the articles own admission, it's biggest claim to fame is "The organization has daylighted and restored a portion of the creek along the parking lot of El Cerrito Plaza Shopping Center.[4] Further down stream part of the creek runs through Pacific East Mall's parking lot." Additionally all of the clubs parent and affiliate organizations are redlinked. I would prefer to preserve the information by merging it to the Cerrito Creek article, which already makes mention of organization. But otherwise, just delete, based on the consensus.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Additional comment: Many of references in the article are from blogs, listings, announcements on local event calendars, or even Friend of the Five Creeks own website, but the article only contains one reference (from the San Fransisco Chronicle) in which Friends of the Five Creeks was the main topic of a published work. It is unlikely that this article (at this point in time) will be able to find more articles about itself, since it only gets 18 google hits, most of which are at 101010berkeley.org. But above all, The article doesnt assert that it has done anything notable.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 15:17, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was withdrawn. Clearly I was in error. — Timneu22 · talk 14:49, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No third-party coverage. Only link is to the "official" Facebook fan page. — Timneu22 · talk 14:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 17:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article was deleted as a result of a PROD, the reason given being "Non notable festival". (At that time the article had the title Symphony - Cultural Festival (KJSCE)). I restored the article in response to a request on my talk page, in order for the person making the request to "establish a better article for my college festival". However, the editor has not edited the article since then, and there is still no evidence of notability. In most cases a college festival is of interest to people connected with the college, but not to outsiders, and no evidence has been given to indicate that this case is an exception. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. I'll R3 the redirect. T. Canens (talk) 01:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The article title is clearly wrong, but this AfD is primarily about the single itself, which doesn't seem to warrant its own page. There is no significant coverage of its own that shows it warrants a page outside of the album. — Timneu22 · talk 13:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I shall endeavour to cover it's subsequent bootleggery and inclusion on several retrospective (and sought after) collections!Bennydigital (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No such geographical or administrative entity exists. The article's contents are pure fantasy. The article creator has falsified information for promoting his home town before. He is now currently blocked for pov pushing and introducing false information. He usually adds false data about Erode's population and geographical spread, but now has gone a step beyond to create a whole new administrative entity out of his imagination. The Prod was contested by an IP (whom i suspect is the author) without any rationale. Sodabottle (talk) 12:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Jujutacular talk 19:06, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Page on a house. Claims some minor notability, however the only web source provided is a Facebook page. Smells a bit like this is a page that someone created about the house he/she lives in. Travelbird (talk) 11:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 17:23, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
--Poet009 (talk) 11:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:27, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy tag removed, thus listed here. Article on a NN game created by article author. WP:MADEUP Travelbird (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing found notable in the article though the result of 1st afd was keep but the voting was not unanimous.Non notable writer with no major 3rd person reviews and no important awards.The books too have not come out to be bestsellers as such.Hence due to non notability the article should be considered properly for deletion.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:13, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
1st AFD was in 2004 which predictably ignored the only solid point, the book has a few reviews but is not significantly notable to be considered an important work which would suggest the author is notable, almost no reliable sources for the author herself exist other than entries in book directories.neon white talk 10:47, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Does not appear to pass WP:SCHOLAR. Appears to be founder of non-notable centre. Worm 10:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We don't need this – it's not notable. No other year-end record chart is listed entirely on Wikipedia. I have created List of year-end number-one singles (New Zealand), which should be a suitable replacement. The following would also need deleting:
Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan Talk Contributions 02:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of notability. Not a single one of the references is a reliable independent source, and some of them do not even mention Moross. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:18, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
As I indicated when I deprodded the article, coverage was found. Many of these are brief mentions, but there is enough there to support an article. I haven't had time to add it as I've been dealing with 20 or so other articles which were inappropriately prodded. It would be helpful to search for coverage before bringing an article to AFD per WP:BEFORE. Your statement that "Not a single one of the references is a reliable independent source" is also incorrect - this includes a scan from NME which is a reliable source and may also be available in your local library. This is from the digital edition of Dazed & Confused - also a reliable source. --Michig (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
More coverage found. Original article needs updating—Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.157.133.158 (talk) 23:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of passing WP:ACADEMIC. The only references given are a deadlink and a directory listing, which establishes existence but nothing more. Very little found on searching. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to List of county roads in Pinellas County, Florida. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:GNG and WP:USRD/NT. Suggest merger into List of county roads in Pinellas County, Florida. Imzadi 1979 → 06:59, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of the article lacks notability. The article has been speedy deleted multiple times because of A7. If the ultimate decision is to delete the article, then I would request salt as well. Thanks Shovon (talk) 04:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No indication that this browser game is notable. Stephen 03:58, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your notice I will improve this article. Thank you. Cryptmaker 12:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC +8)
New parts have been added I will keep up my work. Cryptmaker 17:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC +8)
But sir or Madam, if you use google, you could find a lot of links that are related to this game. and if you type chinse 傲視天地 you could get more, cause this web game is so hot in china's web game market, which are operated by a lot of companies, including Renren baidu. shandang, koramgame and more . Yaowan.com has opened 137 servers. It's really hot. this english game was introduced by Koram since last 3 months it is still young to english people but that does not mean it is a nobody, this well designed game has been purchased by 3 major web game companies and reskined as: Dynasty Saga batheo, war flow. you could find that a lot players are playing them on facebook one of the largetest SNS in the US. Game press write a lot of articles related to this game. And playing strategy discussion could alos been found. Can you imagine a web game doing advertisement on TV in china? no other game has ever made this.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cryptmaker (talk • contribs) 15:35, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was CSD G11 -- Y not? 05:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to suggest that this company meets the notability requirements. The awards are local only, and the tone is overly promotional. Stephen 03:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 01:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to suggest that this company meets the notability requirements. Stephen 03:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. "Speedy repost" is for articles previously deleted per deletion discussion, not per speedy. I guess we need a deletion discussion (i.e. right here) to get this salted. So I've removed the speedy tag. EEng (talk) 12:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing to suggest that this browser game meets the notability requirements. Stephen 03:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Stephen, Thank you for your notice and I will improve them. Cryptmaker 13:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC +8)
The result was Speedy delete under criteria A7. Marasmusine (talk) 15:00, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is not even an encyclopedia article. This is merely a notice about a fan petition campaign about resurrecting a video game character. This is more or less an attempt to use Wikipedia as a web host or garner search engine coverage. –MuZemike 01:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable political candidate, fails WP:BIO; BLP issues. I can't find sufficient coverage of him in reliable sources to justify an article; he's got various mentions in passing, but virtually no direct coverage. Those few articles that do focus on him directly do so in a rather negative light, further suggesting this article should be deleted for WP:BLP reasons. Robofish (talk) 01:24, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article is high in original research and severly lacking in third person sources Dwanyewest (talk) 08:29, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A networking event at which a couple of hundred journalists attend a pub in an English city. Certainly not the size or scope of organization I'd expect to be considered notable; 3 of the sources are very weak (own website, a youtube interview, a podcast) and the more "reliable" sources look like trivial coverage (the Press Gazette articles). TheGrappler (talk) 01:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The issue of renaming is an editorial one and can be discussed on the article's talk page. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A proposed casino that doesn't even exist--violates WP:CRYSTAL. Qworty (talk) 00:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to An American Tragedy. Jujutacular talk 19:12, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing here that isn't in the novel that features this fictional character. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:
Then we can get rid of Category:An American Tragedy characters.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This tour does not seem to demonstrate any inherent notability to warrant a separate article. There is no encyclopedic description in the text, just geography. No third-party references either. Muslim lo Juheu (talk) 01:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A weakly sourced non notable character Dwanyewest (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Geocaching. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No reliable sources found, just one-sentence mentions. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 04:25, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:44, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
These albums fail to meet WP:NALBUMS or WP:GNG; there is little to be found on Google about the composer, even less so about her works. (For example, I looked through the searches and found only rfimusique which includes her but only mentions the album "On Verra" in passing.) :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete unreferenced unverified unknownThisbites (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weakly referenced BLP with no indication of being covered substantially in secondary sources. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 21:15, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:34, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete no indepedant sourcedThisbites (talk) 19:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. This article is certainly in need of improvement, and it may be possible to find sources to expand it into something a lot better than what it is now, but I do not see any clear consensus here on what to do with it. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:37, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary by being just the history and definition of one word. Although the word "greaser" is probably more notable than some other ethnic slurs it is still just a word. The article also lacks good sources and is unclear on what the word means. Is it just Mexicans, all Hispanic people, Italians too, or any dark-haired young man who uses hair oil? The claim that it originates from Mexican people being hired to grease the axles of mule carts during the Mexican American War also seems a little out there to me. Jaque Hammer (talk) 13:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. No prejudice against undoing the redirect if the single charts after it is released and there are reliable sources. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NSONG. Logan Talk Contributions 16:42, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:12, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Does not appear to meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:ACADEMIC on the face of the article, but quite a few references to her or her works can be found by digging through this search. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. GedUK 11:43, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"List" containing only three times. In no way is this a "list". Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 03:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Six items is hardly a "list". Information is 5 years out of date. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]