The result was no consensus to delete, default to keep. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 21:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article needs a lot of help to be neutral, and was created by the orgnization itself thus it is also spam. It really doesn't have a place on Wikipedia, and fails to cite sources. Let's delete it. Me-123567-Me (talk) 03:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Withdrawn Mhiji 00:35, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn by user, further edits show notability
:TeacherTube (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)
fails WP:NOTABILITY; only 1 of the two references given are actually notable; the American Instutite for History Teaching is not a notable institution and lists teachertube as "an on-line partner of the American Institute for History Education"; of course they'll have an article, they're trying to boost its popularity. Ironholds 00:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Usefulness is not a deciding factor in keeping an article (even though it is an understandable sentiment), and no indication that the independent sources are forthcoming or available. Fram (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is very scant verifiable information contained in this article and without facts, it can hardly be considered "encyclopedic." I am not sure how anything other than a complete rewrite could save it. However, as other people have also mentioned, I don't know there is truly a great debate between these two technologies. Therefore the value of a rewrite would be negligible.
--I have to agree that it appears that this article was not written for the purpose of providing information but rather to try and draw a favorable comparison of Flex over Ajax. It smacks of someone writing articles as a paid advocate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.125.90 (talk) 05:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 23:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company, advertising Madcoverboy (talk) 23:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Company is Notable. This company created and produced "The Brothers Garcia" which ran on Nickelodeon and The N from 2000-2003 and has produced music videos and live concert dvd's for notable major label music acts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirhuxley (talk • contribs) 23:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, or merge. What is clearly evident here is there is no support for deletion. Keep is the result for now, merging is also strongly supported, so a merge may be most appropriate. That is for the talkpages of the respective articles. Keeper ǀ 76 19:25, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Has been tagged for 9 months. Programme doesn't exist anymore in anycase. Traditional unionist (talk) 23:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 22:40, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously self-promotional bio of a Pakistani scholar, apparently strongly exaggerated claims to notability ("famous publications"). See also Ghost Characters Theory, pushing the same agenda. Unsourced. I don't exclude there might be some real notability somewhere to be found out there, though it will probably be difficult to verify without access to Urdu literature; but in any case, even if there's something legit at the core of it, the present text is unuseable for being blatantly promotional. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable code implementation. No third party sources or references I could find, so fails WP:NOTABILITY. Ironho lds 23:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ejscript is noteworthy because it is the first ECMAScript 4 implementation. This is a very new open source project (weeks old) and so references on the web take a little time to show up. I cited a few extra references which I will edit into the article:
It is also starting to show up in blogs
Lastly, other page discussions have complained Javascript and ecmascript about the lack of information about ECMAScript 4. This page is just such a page and is relevant to the most recent trends with Javascript.
I'm happy to edit the article to bring into line with Wikipedia guidelines, but how do I convince it is not just an advert?
Michael O'Brien (talk) 23:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Michael O'Brien (talk) 16:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: You asked about the Samba reference. Samba 4 uses a prior version of Ejscript. Michael O'Brien (talk) 04:23, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus. –BuickCenturyDriver 22:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No real notability; just another government official. Biruitorul Talk 18:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable company per WP:CORP, also reads like an WP:ADVERT Madcoverboy (talk) 21:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge into DST Systems. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No assertion of notability nor any notability per WP:CORP, references broken or piped press releases Madcoverboy (talk) 22:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote a response, but then I lost it somewhere in the wiki ether. It goes something like this. 1)DST International is not the international arm of DST Systems and actually sells products that the parent does not. (HiPortfolio, a very common fund accounting software being one. (Google HiPortfolio for ref) 2)I am relatively new to wikipedia and it was my failure to use software properly that led to error in refs, I have now repaired with outside sources and notes. 3) I find it very unusual that a company is notable by its mere presence on the NYSE, by that argument, should every company on every exchange get a mention? Or is the US special in some regard? 4)I have removed most piped press releases and added a few articles I have seen regarding the company, hopefully these are notable. 5) As a subsidiary, it is not listed under its parent, which brings into doubt the "completeness" of the DST Systems piece. As a regular user of HiPortfolio3, which is well known, I found it strange that this company was not listed. I will work on a HiPortfolio entry in the near future. 6) Content is covered in parent as I tried to write to the same style, and did not wish to have this listing longer than bigger parent. Also, CRD mentioned in the article should have an entry here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Liambussell (talk • contribs) 04:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As they appear in the news a number of times, and coming back to my initial point, DST International is the sole vendor of two systems of Note, HiPortfolio, a fund accounting program (which is very well known) and HiRisk/Askari (Which is a portfolio Risk Analysis program) both are widely used, and I wanted to add an entry for HiPortfolio, as I use it everyday. If you search Google or MSN etc, there are Hiportfolio jobs listings, training courses and info pages, all seperate to DST International. So I feel the company that provides the product is therefore notable. Sorry, the above comment is meLiambussell (talk) 07:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete/Redirect to Sugarland (duo) Merging can be done if necessary via the edit history. --JForget 22:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tour doesn't start until later. No reliable sources about anything else than the start date and supporting artists. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional article with no evidence of notability Mayalld (talk) 15:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as he fails WP:ATHLETE and one featured article does not constitute significant coverage (per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Ensign F.C.). пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Kevin Reiman was originally nominated for deletion as part of a bundle under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Lascody. The debate was closed under snow, and after checking with the closing admin it was clarified as a snow for relisting them separately. [16] I'm going through them to see which ought to be deleted, and Kevin fits the bill of not passing either WP:Athlete, as he's never appeared for RSL, or WP:Bio, as the only non trivial coverage is one piece in a local paper. At first glance, the article is well sourced, but many of the citations are from student newspapers or club profiles. That leaves four sources. He's listed in an ESPN piece in 2004 as one of 7 players who are exciting recruits for Maryland that year. Since they list 5ish recruits from each of the 25 schools, his name is literally one of over 100: not significant coverage. The Salt Lake Tribune mention is trivial as well: it just includes him in an infobox of the thirteen new players RSL has acquired in between seasons.[17] The Deseret News mention is also trivial, listing him as one of three boys hoping to defy the odds of actually playing in the MLS even though they weren't picked till the supplemental draft.[18] The Journal News piece is, however, a feature on him and how he hopes to play in the MLS.[19]. That said, I don't think one piece in a local paper is enough to pass WP:Bio, and he clearly fails WP:Athlete. So, I'm relisting him, and I say Delete. Vickser (talk) 22:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Not enough evidence (as defined in WP:NOTE for his supposed notability has been shown. Comments by T-rex were particularly unhelpful. Fram (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Subject is a member of a non-notable karate team, was in a music video and has done some stunt work. Only reliable (I guess it is, anyway) source provided gives even less info: one stunt credit, one acting role (as "Boy on Bike"). Mdsummermsw (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect all others to Santangelo family. I will not perform the merge, since there was serious disagreement over the need of any merge of the currently available material. It is all still in the history, so if anyone wants to merge, they are free to do so. If anyone recreates any of these articles (without significant imporvements, especially in independent sourcing), I suggest a "speedy G4" redirection. Fram (talk) 11:25, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not needed here. It is non-notable, plain and simple. It has no reason to be here. I am also nominating the following related pages because they are either stubbed, simply one sentence, or assert no notability as well. ALL of these pages don't need to be here!!:
ZeroGiga (talk) 21:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete with no prejudice against recreating articles establishing notability, e.g. for the "Weekly Cutting Edge" from Pakistan (!).
Both do not assert notability. Notability seems low. The Indian one is probably more suitable for the Hindi WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Shereth 18:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy declined with a comment about how such a long-standing mil. hist. article should go to AfD not speedy A7. Article makes no effort at all to establish notability of the subject. Article has no references. Article has no dates or contextual information to let the reader know such things as: What century was this army formed? What did they do? Why? Article fails to provide any information and has failed to do so for 3 years now. L0b0t (talk) 13:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The only policy-based arguments made here were merge or delete. Since the AfD on the author has been closed as delete, merge isn't really an option.Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:12, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a book that is not important or significant. Damiens.rf 15:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Damiens, I'm Ed Williams. Glad to know you're the arbiter of what's important. I would rather you take the article down, it's not like it brings me one extra dollar. Good luck to you, you should be truly proud of yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.139.224 (talk) 01:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Les, thanks. Y'all might as well remove this as my regular Wiki listing was deleted as well. There are also references to me on the Kay Parker, Juliette, Georgia, Milledgeville, Georgia and Bachman-Turner Overdrive listings that y'all will want to clean up.
There are no hard feelings - the best to you all.
Ed Williams
Comment author is Ed Williams (novelist), which for some reason had been made into a redirect to someone else. DuncanHill (talk) 12:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC) To Ed Williams' I have restored the article about you, and corrected the links in the article about the book and at Milledgville and Juliette, I couldn't find a mention of you at BTO or Kay Parker. DuncanHill (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A bio article about this person (Ed Williams) had just been deleted. It used to be at Ed Williams (where now lies an article about an homonymous actor) Damiens.rf 14:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are now both Library of Congress listings for my books, which certainly proves it exists. There are also links to feature articles on Southern Scribe.com and a keynote speaking gig I did for the awards banquet for the Georgia Library Association a few years back. Also included a speaker's bureau listing, and my appearance with Deborah Ford and Dedra Grizzard at a literary festival. There's more stuff I could add, but the main thing I wanted to do here is substantiate some things. If y'all still remove the listing, it's fine, but at least I'll feel like you did it from the facts, and not because you felt that none of the listing could be substantiated.
Thank you,
68.107.198.71 (talk) 14:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 16:08, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable county fair, fails WP:N ukexpat (talk) 22:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To whom it may concern, I am putting together an article about an annual event that takes place every year in Barnesville, GA. I understand that the article needs references, sources and clean up. That will come with time. I wanted to get a shell of an article going that was accurate. My hopes are to enlist more participation from citizens of the town to help purify the article making it more flavorful and accurate.
Please do not delete.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bullet30204 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. –BuickCenturyDriver 11:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per WP:MUSIC Madcoverboy (talk) 17:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, though I urge a speedy improvement of the article, since it does look pretty shoddy. Wizardman 15:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This individual may or may not deserve an article but regardless of that, this isn't it; it is irredeemably bad. It is written in the present tense and every single sentence ends in an exclamation mark. It is unreferenced and includes gems such as "Joe H. was off to England to play in the infamous ‘Hard Rock Hell” festival at the Butlins resort", which leads me to suppose it's not genuine. Ros0709 (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I can't see much point in creating a redirect, so I did not, but with no prejudice to anyone doing it, given this discussion content. - Nabla (talk) 12:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fancruft; music is not notable for appearing on a TV show IRK!Leave me a note or two 20:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Denver Public Schools#Closed schools - Nabla (talk) 12:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have concerns about this article's notability. I know Wikipedia:Notability (schools) is still a proposal, but this school appears to fail it because I could not find non-trivial secondary sources on it. This article was recently created with this content; I tried to fix it up a little so it's at least presentable. I noticed that schools are specifically exluded from the CSD and I don't feel comfortable using a proposed deletion yet, so I figured I'd list it here. —Pie4all88 (talk) 21:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(talk) 21:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable organization - very few hits on Google, no incoming links, not even mentioned in parent school except for an external link. Jiuguang Wang (talk) 23:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a promotional page or vanity article, with no assertion of notability. The creator and only major contributor is a user who has edited only two articles, both related to this book and judging by his username I believe he is the book's author. --Lo2u (T • C)
The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:14, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do we need an article about what kind of a shadow color wheels cast? There are no examples or links to demonstrate what these "illustrious works of art" look like. Surely we can squeeze this under the color wheel article, if necessary. Adoniscik(t, c) 21:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Result = Speedy delete as patent hoax GBT/C 21:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PROD contested by page creator. Procedural nom, bringing to community for consensus. Seems to be a hoax, no real available sourcing. GlassCobra 20:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Not a good speedy delete candidate, but a proper deletion candidate, which lacks notability. A name amongst thousands of others. Fram (talk) 13:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn topic. No evidence that this name is borne by anybody notable. Mayalld (talk) 20:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. One of possibly hundreds of thousands of different given names in the World, and I can't see anything that makes this one particularly notable. I disagree with Artlondon's comparison with geo-stubs since settlements have, by precedent, attained "inherent notability" and this has not happened (perhaps yet) for given names. Wikipedia:Other stuff exists is a good discussion of the "article x exists and so y should too" argument. Jll (talk) 13:40, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced short article about a tv episode without indication why this episode is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge (non-admin closure), Content already merged with The Third Witch#Film adaptation. Redirect made. Protonk (talk) 05:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article about a film not yet in production, so per the notability guidelines for future films, its existence is not yet warranted. Information has been placed at The Third Witch#Film adaptation in the meantime. If production does begin, which is never a guarantee, then the article can be recreated. Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to symptom#types for both per WP:UCS. WLU (talk) 12:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
violates WP:DICDEF as it is just a definition. Belongs in a dictionary not an encyclopedia. GtstrickyTalk or C 20:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While we are at it:
Asymptomatic also.
The result was delete. I've also applied a dusting of salt because of the repeated recreation. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article about an unverifiable sequel to The Wild. It looks like a hoax; even if it is not, there is no evidence that production has begun on this Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete for failing WP:VERIFIABILITY. Kafziel Complaint Department 00:33, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article about an animated film whose production status is questionable; see IMDb. The most recent citation I could find was from September 2007, and it seems to express an intent to produce the film. There has not been any coverage since, so we cannot be sure that it has been produced and thus come out in theaters. If there is word down the road that this film was produced, then the article can be recreated. Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article about a web-only one makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Note: Several other journals follow, I am not grouping them as each stays or goes on its own notability vel non, but note any publication can call itself a medical journal, some among these are not peer reviewed, some are web-only, some defunct and some suffer several of these deficiencies - Yahoo and other online spaces have numerous groups devoted to talking and blogging about various hospitals, conditions, diseases, or medical care generally - just search for "autism", "cancer", or even "constipation"; those spaces aren't notable and either necessarily are the for-profit versions of the same... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 21:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article about a defunct journal that lasted only 2 years makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced short article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this one-line article sourced only to its subject makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this one-line article sourced only to its subject makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge (non-admin closure),Merge with Ahmadiyya per WP:BOLD and discussion below. Protonk (talk) 04:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Correct article already exists here: Ahmadiyya Muslim Community Jack1956 (talk) 19:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:16, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Bold keep, while the article still needs to be improved, notability has clearly been established. Will tag for improvement. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 14:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 07:08, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as per unanimous consensus. Ecoleetage (talk) 00:01, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced biography of a non-notable professor/author. Blatant conflict of interest. Contested prod. BradV 19:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 07:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus (default keep). Valid arguments and concerns on both sides. No clear consensus could be determined fro m the discussion, and there was no indication that a relist period would resolve this. Defaulting to keep per guidance in the deletion policy. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:56, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Lauren Grandcolas is notable only for making a call from United Airlines Flight 93, which is something many passengers did. Her actions are documented on that article. That she contributed to charities and roller-bladed around the neighborhood does not add to the fact that that was all she was notable for. Her book was published posthumously by her sisters and does not have its own article of notability. As quoted in WP:ONEEVENT: If reliable sources only cover the person in the context of a particular event, then a separate biography is unlikely to be warranted. VegitaU (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep(non-admin closure) The only delete votes aside from the nominator argue that the article should be redirected until someone comes along and expands the article, I shall go do that! -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 04:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep, per WP:SNOW. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 07:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete medical journals are not inherently notable and the this unsourced one-line article makes no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep Article has been vastly expanded and bears little resemblance to the one nominated. (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced one-liner about a dog breed with no indication that this breed is recognized or notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure). Non-trivial, notability asserting coverage exists. WilliamH (talk) 17:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unreferenced one-liner about a software product with no assertion of its notability Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Don't delete without attempting to make a very small stub more worthy. This was an OS from a historically important vendor and the commercial experience of this OS illustrates the nature of the market. Microsoft was beginning to make its move toward OS dominance, along with Intel controlling the biggest chunk ofthe CPU market. It should be referenced in the articles having to do with the historical development of that market. ww (talk) 01:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily delete as obvious hoax. --RobertG ♬ talk 22:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prod placed by another editor was removed. This appears to be a blatant hoax. Google shows no evidence of any such 'ghost' nor do the alleged 'references'. All editors 'contributing' to the article are single purpose accounts:
Voceditenore (talk) 18:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, default to keep. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 21:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article was deleted and redirected at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Schlafly (2nd nomination). A new version was created and was speedy deleted as a G4 (recreation of deleted article). A Deletion Review - Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 July 4 - overturned this speedy deletion and recommended relisting at AFD. I have no opinion. Davewild (talk) 18:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded."
Commment I hope all these "keep" votes are going to stick around and help find these supposedly notable sources, last time we went through this people voted keep and ignored the article, a month later we had to go through this proccess again. Arguments of notability are completely invalid in this case. Regardless of his notability there are not enough sources you can not override the core policy of verifiability for an article. Regardless of how notable one might think he is there are not enough sources, that is the problem. The article that everyone sees now that needs substantial editing and rewriting is about as good as it gets. It can not get any better. If you vote "keep" you are basically saying the article as it stands now is good enough. If this article is not deleted we will be back here in a few weeks doing this again, because there are not enough sources. Tmtoulouse (talk) 22:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Nomination failed to receive any support for deletion. There were several rational suggestions for possible merge or modification actions, which perhaps should continue to be discussed and pursued outside of AfD. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N, WP:OR, WP:NPOV, WP:COPYVIO, WP:ADVERT (For separation of 'Koshal' region from Orissa, India), Duplication.
Delete Article: Article seems like an extreme enthusiast’s essay without appropriate content. Other pages: Sambalpur as well as Sambalpur district already exist and include similar information with requisite level of detail, and under appropriate nomenclature. There is no need to duplicate information as it confuses reader. Article fails WP:N, no direct & relevant sources for claims and assertions have been given. Also article has WP:OR issue with several sentences, giving tone of POV. Multiple Copyvio issues are present.
--
soft
dynamite
(talk) 18:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note, just copy-edited: some text was hidden due to paragraph indenting.
The article need some editing and not deletion. It does not provoke any separatist movement. Rather it propagate the unique culture and heritage of Kosal Region which is solely separate from the culture and tradition of Orissa or Eastern Orissa. Kosal region is also synonymic to Sambalpuri or Sambalpur thats why there is no issue of deletion arises. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Saketsree (talk • contribs) 11:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-What I see here is the creation of multiple sock-puppets in an organsied manner to canvass for and an attempt to increase the 'Votes to keep'. Though pointing it may not be of any relevance to the issue of deletion or otherwise of the article, it is observeed the syntax of all users implicitly arguing to keep the article seems strikingly similar, same errors and same usage have been made. Also that, a common feature of all the above users is leaving the comments unsigned, a mistake so often also made by Satyajit Nayak (talk.It seems pertinent to clarify that Afd discussion is NOT A VOTE. The closing administrator will surely use the reasoned consensus, and not mere no.s of Ayes and Nays. Requesting interested parties to be fair and honorable. Wikipedia is not a place for cultural advertisement or waging heritage war.
The following user ids have been created and edited over the past one week:
-- soft dynamite (talk) 13:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly recommend not deleting such a great collection of articles related to our place, people, language and culture. And urge to the moderators to take punitive action towards ids such as soft dynamite and Pdipu for creating unnecessary confusion by giving improper information about our place. We know our place better than any outsider. Anandsagardash (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Like Rome, a city based kingdom, Sambalpur was too. And the "Sambalpur" name doesn't only represent present day's Sambalpur district or Sambalpur city. Before independence a larger geographical area from central province of British India brought under Orissa Division. And the geographical area was comprising present day's districts of Jharsuguda,Sambalpur,Deogarh,Bargarh, Subarnapur, Balangr, Nuapada and Kalahandi. British administration recognised these parts as Sambalpur District for their administrative purpose and stationed a assistant commissioner in Sambalpur town. Later these area along with some more districts formed the Northern division in independent India with headquarter in Sambalpur city. "Sambalpuri" is the prime language for day to day communication in these part of orissa state along with Sundargarh and Boud districts and Athamallik sub-division of Anugul district. Sambalpuri language has a larger presence in neighboring state of Chattishgarh too. In Mahasamund,Raigarh,Jashpur,Raipur districts of Chattishgarh, there are many speakers in Sambalpuri language. Now a days,Sambalpuri language has a dominating presence in digital media in eastern region of India through its rhythmic, vibrant folk as well as modern music. It is popular through entire orissa,Chattishgarh and Jharkhand state. This is the only language from orissa which has cross border presence in day to day communication as well as in entertainment. Sambalpuri language is going through a transforming phase. So many writers, poets are writing various articles , subjects in Sambalpuri literature. The epic Ramayana, Mahabharata and Bhagvat Geeta are already published in this language and available in the market. It has a bigger and rich vocabulary than the state language Oriya. The grammer and vocubulary books are already published in this language. Sambalpuri vocabulary is totally different from that of Oriya, which gives it a distinct language status. There is no grammatical relation between Sambalpuri and Oriya.Sambalpuri has Aryan origin like Sanskrit and Hindi where as Oriya comes under Dravidian family. The Govt. run Sambalpur University has started a Post graduate study programme in Sambalpuri studies. Also, the Govt. run All India Radio (AIR) and Door Darshan have recognised the potential and popularity of this language and have provided slots for airing programme in Sambalpuri. So, with out any doubt, few people like Soft Dynamite and Pdipu are indulge doing cultural invasion upon us to erase our identity, language and cultural practice by assimilating with them. I request the moderators to kindly consider our concern and take appropriate action to wards ids like soft dynamite and Pdipu. Anandsagardash (talk) 09:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
-- soft dynamite (talk) (Contributions) 21:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
--Reply>>Bonadea (talk) this article is not only about a movement to create separate state,it's about highlighting the cultural heritage of sambalpuri people.Regarding the so called sockpuppets,I would suggest you to bring an expert to match my writing with them or you can check the IP address and region from where they are loging in.Second thing what is irrevelant arguments ?? All the things are fact,If some outsider can malign our image by misleading information then the sambalpuri people have every rights to tell the facts about their culture..I would suggest you to have a look at this neutral link taken from India's National and Oldest daily The Hindu:[48]..or you can got through [49].I think there is nothing in this article which is objectionalble,but as certain costal oriya user are trying to mislead wikipedia users by arguing against the article.Like china is doing to tibetian,these costal oriya's are doing the same to sambalpuri or kosali people.They are forcing their language and culture on the people of kosal region--Satyajit Nayak (talk)
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), as nobody supported this request. Ruslik (talk) 18:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The article is a borderline spam article - the developer doesn't have an articl, there's nothing about gameplay, there are no sources, and the page is uncategorised. Sceptre (talk) 18:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
THis is a informationable site for poptropica this is kinda like advertising but keep the page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Himee2 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Redirect (non-admin closure), Merged per consensus below to Edmonton Catholic School District. Just a redirect at this point. Content may be moved selectively from history. Protonk (talk) 05:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails notability guidelines. It's a primary school with no apparent prominence. Previous prod removed by sole author. No unaffiliated sources cited. RayAYang (talk) 18:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 00:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just a repetition of plot information from other Warhammer 40,000 articles. As such, it is duplicative, trivial, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as SPEEDY DELETE db-author. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 19:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Pointless disambiguation. The TV series is a red link, and the Big & Rich song isn't notable enough for its own page (it wasn't released as a single). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete as he fails WP:ATHLETE, having never played in a fully professional league. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Palacio was previously part of a bundled nomination for deletion under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doug Lascody. It was closed early per WP:Snow, and when I checked with the closing admin he explained "My closing rationale should have read the following: "These players are too different to be bundled together in one AFD, especially because one of them, Dominic Cervi, was nominated less than a month ago," [53] and gave permission for me to go ahead and relist. The reason Palacio should be deleted is because he does not meet WP:Athlete since he has never made an appearance for a professional senior team, only been drafted by one. Vickser (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. Bearian (talk) 01:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable primary (up to age 11) school. ukexpat (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. One keep argument seems to be misinformed (for once: DGG's arguments are usually pretty good) or at least not supported by other editors. Fram (talk) 14:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly unsourced autobiography. Previous AfD resulted in no consensus but no improvements to the article have been made since then, and no additional sources can be found. BradV 17:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was No consensus (default keep). Merging seems to be the most reasonable outcome, which at least in part has already been attempted by TerriersFan. Completion of this effort and redirection can be handled outside of AfD, and does not require anything to be deleted. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Page was 95% copyrighted material taken from here, which has now been removed. Remainder doesn't include references. As per the suggestions in WP:SCHOOLS, middle schools are generally not notable without coverage from secondary sources. justinfr (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. A difficult call, but in the end I don't feel that squads at the event are notable enough to be described in detail. If anyone wants to merge the detail (in compressed form) to 2008 VIVA World Cup, let me know and I'll copy it to your userspace. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would seriously query the value of an article consisting of a list of names of footballers who are, with very few exceptions, neither notable nor ever likely to become so, on the basis that they pay in a competition whose attendances are comparable with the Ithsmian leagues. Kevin McE (talk) 16:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Snowball Keep --JForget 23:31, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable RPG campaign setting Blowdart | talk 16:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable RPG Blowdart | talk 16:18, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable RPG Blowdart | talk 16:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable RPG Blowdart | talk 16:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was obvious hoax. Speedily deleted. JDoorjam JDiscourse 16:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This company entry is a transparent hoax. It claims that it was set up last year by a 17-year old, has three employees, and "headquarters in London, New York, Paris, Tokyo, Osaka, Mumbai, Dubai". Not surprisingly the web-site listed does not exist, and a Google search for "Seniore financial services" produces nothing relevant. It was introduced by Mighty Ne (talk · contribs) with a claimed revenue of $41 billion, and has been played about with by Dimitrischristoforou (talk · contribs), who is listed as the founder; but it's all fantasy. Delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 22:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There are no references for the use of this term with this meaning in the article, except for it's use in a single movie. The "Wired" article referenced does not contain the term. Certainly not worth a separate article. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted as non-notable bio. JDoorjam JDiscourse 16:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is little more than a self-promotional piece written by Patersonap (talk · contribs) who seems to be the subject himself. The subject of the article seems to fail WP:CREATIVE as well as general guidelines of WP:N. A Google search of "ali paterson" turns up no promising leads for verification through reliable sources. As well, searches of "Hunter of the Kahri" (the film he is supposedly famous for) and "The Third Testament: The Antichrist and the Harlot" (the new film he's currently working on) return similar unverifiable results. SWik78 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was moot. Article has boldly been made into a redirect. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Disambig page not needed for a single article. Would like to move Juan Pardo (explorer) to Juan Pardo ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:26, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A "community publication...a gated community...published...a resident" Covers news about the gated community and there's no evidence it has attracted any attention or garnered any notability outside the community. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 14:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Also, plain lists of items (including people) can not be copyrighted as there is no original creative content. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:56, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another randomly assembled, highly subjective list with no objective encyclopedic value (and a tenuous grasp at reality, with Madama Butterfly and Godzilla mistaken for real people). The high number of red links doesn't help, either. Ecoleetage (talk) 14:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn per notability arguments. Tan | 39 16:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced and non-notable. Promotional in nature. Tan | 39 14:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Nominator did not receive any support for deletion and discussion has stagnated. Although the keep opinions were weak, we have instructions to default to keep when there is not support for delete. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails Wikipedia:Notability (music). While this bassist has played with a number of notable artists, there is no indication of his notability in this article. Zero verifiable 3rd party references where he is the subject of the article, no mention of awards. No indication of being especially representative of a particular musical style. Rtphokie (talk) 14:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper ǀ 76 21:48, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable theory. No references given, zero hits on Google Scholar for either it or its creator. Fails WP:V, WP:N. RGTraynor 14:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, largely on the basis of this coverage. Feel free to move it to a more accurate title (or even merge it into 1986 FIFA World Cup given its short length). пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:41, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the official film of the 1986 FIFA World Cup in Mexico, and it's narrated by Michael Caine. That's pretty much all the information I can find about it. The text of the article consists of a gushingly adoring review of the film (which I couldn't find to be a copyvio, although I did just undo an edit that was copy-pasted from an Amazon review). IMDB says it was released in West Germany, but doesn't specify what that release entailed; Amazon.co.uk does indicate that this was released as a VHS at some point, somewhere. FIFAFilms.com lists it as part of the FIFA World Cup™ Film Collection ("available for professional business users") and says it's "award-winning" but doesn't say what award it won. My best impression is that it's an essentially promotional release, although perhaps a very well-done one. If others are able to find justification to keep the article/topic, it does seem that it should at least be moved to Hero (1987 film). Propaniac (talk) 14:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Nomination withdrawn.. Nonadmin closure. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I had considered speedying this, but I usually associate those with COI vanity pages, so I thought it would be more fair in this case to at least garner a consensus. My main case for deletion is that there's really not much claims of notability, outside of accompanying John Forrest twice and his role in the Catalpa rescue. I did a quick google search and "Hector Neil McLarty" took up two non-wiki pages, and "Hector McLarty" gains 20. CyberGhostface (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, I'm redrawing my nomination as it appears that the main contributor has done a lot of work on this article and others.--CyberGhostface (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper ǀ 76 20:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Individual is noted for having been arrested and accused of a criminal offence, but is otherwise not notable. Given the limited scope of coverage in the sources, it appears that WP:BLP1E, WP:BIO1E, and WP:NOT#NEWS apply here. ITAQALLAH 14:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 15:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
(was an incomplete afd) Notability? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A great set of comments, and clearly this bio needs to be updated with better references and linkages. Thanks for the input.
A quick review of this bio would note the following
-- the "Japanese" reference is indeed to a journal with a Japanese cover, but the text inside is English -- The null-finding from Amazon is obviously wrong, since one of the footnotes links to one of Kilpatrick's books on Amazon. Other footnotes link to other books (Lexis-Nexis, Environmental Law Center) -- A "google" on John Kilpatrick unfortunately picks up a lot of noise from other Kilpatricks who are equally notable. However, a google on John Kilpatrick real estate is illuminating, and picks up at least one other Amazon.com link, an interview with Kilpatrick on economistblog.com, a published paper on the social sciences research network, a link to a published piece in the Journal of Real Estate Research, and others.
It's clear that some of the links can be improved, and I'll be glad to do that.
Thesurveyor (talk) 20:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), notable ehough, should be added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Hotels. Ruslik (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not clear cut for speedy, and author would likely contest a prod. Listed here as it seems article was created in good faith. (I abstain from the discussion.) Ian¹³/t 13:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 15:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Wizardman 15:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:37, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 23:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax, Sockpuppetry Meatstrain (talk) 13:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 23:34, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax, Suckpuppetry Meatstrain (talk) 13:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 23:35, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hoax, Sockpuppetry Meatstrain (talk) 13:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
— MostofAll4It (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
At first, I was on the side to delete it a few days ago when I stumbled across it, but after reading the discussion that followed and now doing my own research at the library without the admins turned religious warriors, students, and other ad-hoc researchers I have my own research and conclusions. Alot of the admins sucked into this one were part of the ryan vs meatstrain war about some posting on a Dominican page. This is more like a soap opera than a discussion...lol. I was simply drawn to page to see the interesting cyber battles and having a boring day will jump into the mosh pit with my obsessive-compulsive urge and X files influenced curiosity. -
(a) Edward, the only person who has evaluated all the sources is some person named Abdul Zayed who also claims he was involved in a 'Jewish worldwide conspiracy against Palestine'. If that a legitimate fact check, I am going to write an article on George Bush and why he is a verifiable idiot and post my sources. All the verifications are going to come from me and on the same page, I state I think Bush is a religious dictator; I am going to do a source check since I am neutral and I expect you to support me.
(b) The Deutsch Volk like Pater and exc...There is something called 'Yiddish' and its not the same as German, though does use similar words (according to my co-worker who is Jewish). The correct usage in the books I found was not Nacht Der Tanz its Nachte Taeze and several other variations. Did I mention that I believe religion to be the cause of all wars and am proud to be an athiest against all fairy tales and that though I am raised Catholic I reject all fantasy? I might be banned by the Catholic mafia admins on here for that...but so it goes.
(c) Bardin, I am guitar player and have worked with several major people in the industry including Mary j and recently Janet Jackson and I am not in that book for 10+ years and have many more names on the shelf than this guy does. If you want to be in those books, there is an easy way: you pay them. Hundreds of people work with these artists. So is the standard finding the actual references or notability or seeing if I can see a face or how I conform to what seems to be a group of admins pissed about a religious issue or just being nice to an admin so he will go with what I want to say and get all the people I dont like off Wiki? Your page says you are a lawyer and that the New Grove Dictionary of Music is the standard for your research? I can pay that book to be placed in it....then will you place me on Wiki? If you are a lawyer, and I will take your word for it that you are, that is possibly the lamest prosecution I have heard.
(d) Yes, I am obsessive compulsive and frequently go on quests such as this (maybe Jesus, Buddha, or Zeus is cursing me?) as I question everything...I am probably going to Hell (sorry Pater, Edward and other friends of the Lord).
(e) Lady from KMG, stop the thought control along with some of the admins. For the GFDL, I am with you since I am a musician and not a lawyer or a specialist in the Dominican Friars. People are interested about the person, you cannot stop either people from writing a good or bad (as per billboard) review. For the GFDL, sue them if they post it again. For the rest, sorry...it is a free world...or at least before George Bush, it was free.
(f) Sheila, upload any song I have worked on and you can chat to the RIAA next.
(g) Meatstrain, some good points in there, but emailing all your admin friends to say its a hoax does not establish notability.
I went to the library and found three of the books and here we go:
'The Book of Klezmer' p. 115 paragraph six: 'Joel Kass (b.1968) was influential in the synthesis between klezmer and orchestral elements along with mentor Merlin Shepard who was the taught traditional klezmer in schools and yeshivas across the country in the mid eighties. Bands such as Habrera Hativeet continued this trend blending eastern and Middle Eastern melodies.
page 119: In 1991 Joel Kass performed at Klezkamp and has been an influential part of the revival of klezmer music along with others such as Giora Feidman who after winning praise in Europe left the Israel Philharmonic to focus solely on klezmer developing the Night Dance.
(picture of the guy in front on an orchestra not same as site with caption, 'Kass conducting in Austria 1991'
I then sent the email to the band Habrea Hativeet and asked, do you know who a Joel Kass is and if he did anything notable in any way? Here is the response:
Hello Sir
Thank to you for contacting with question in polite way. I meet him twice when he perform here but do not know him so can not be authority on topic but he do create the Dance of Night. 'Nacht Der Tanz' is probably trying to render Yiddish which is not German but mean Dance of Night in English. We have simmilar problem with word to go to Arabic or Polish as my first language is Moroccan and second is Hebrew so even my own word to you may be confusing. For book you mention it was funny as I know the authors son who live here with wife and own book so he is in that and the quote you have is correct. Other than this I do not know him personal however I do have relative who may have more information if u wish it.
Best of wishes to you
Shlomo Bar
>>>>
Greetings from the USA!
I am currently researching a book called the Book of Klezmer and an article that refers to a person in it named Joel Kass. I found your address via the website, and hope this email finds you in good health. I listened to your performance on the NPR clip and you have a very nice voice. I play guitar as a session player here, so if you are ever in the neighborhood, I would be excited to create some new material. Below are the quotes I have:
'The Book of Klezmer' p. 115 paragraph six: 'Joel Kass (b.1968) was influential in the synthesis between klezmer and orchestral elements along with mentor Merlin Shepard who was the taught traditional klezmer in schools and yeshivas across the country in the mid eighties. Bands such as Habrera Hativeet continued this trend blending eastern and Middle Eastern melodies.
page 119: In 1991 Joel Kass performed at Klezkamp and has been an influential part of the revival of klezmer music along with others such as Giora Feidman who after winning praise in Europe left the Israel Philharmonic to focus solely on
klezmer.
'A-Z of Classical Composers' page 21-22:
Howard Joel Kass: American composer and descendant of Serge Koussevitzky whose work has focused on the synthesis of klezmer and classical arrangements. Noted for the creation of Nachte Tants (Yiddish for Dance of the Night) also referred to as Nachte Taeze. References:
a.Feldman, Walter. "Bulgareasca/Bulgarish/Bulgar: The Transformation of a Klezmer Dance Genre,"
Ethnomusicology 38:1 (1994), 36.
b.Goren, Ayalah. 1986. "The Ethnic Dance in Israel, with Selected filmography,"
Jewish Folklore and Ethnology Newsletter 8/3-4:2.
c.Friedland, LeeEllen. 1985-86. "Tantsn Is Lebn: Dancing in Eastern European Jewish Culture,"
Dance Research Journal 17/2 & 18/1:77-80.
I then went to look at the 3 above and found one of them, (a):
'Although highly influenced by the works of Debussy, H. Joel Kass brought together Polish klezmer and orchestral arrangement in his "Dance of the Night", a new development in the continuing evolution of the genre.'
A Bibliography of Computer Music page 23:
..Kevin Saunderson, Joel Kass and others who in the Detroit metro area contributed to the development of 'House Music'. Saunderson has become influential post his Inner City days as a producer in the UK where House continues to thrive...
page 45:
...and Joel Kass who worked programmed the MPC beats for producers such as Rick Wake in the NYC Hip Hop era of the 90's (followed by a ref to the keyboard magazine link that meatstrainer said he could not find). So my quest continued.
Instead of using Wayback, I went to that aged thing called the stack room and asked the librarian to get me that keyboard magazine article to which I have located it. The article itself does not prove notabiltity, its simply a short interview on what kinds of a type of gear that was common at the time called a Fairlight system (3 paragraphs). It was new and he worked at Powerstation in NYC making music, which does not make it notable, but the magazine is there.
That’s what I think.
Your always loud, atheist, and disagreeable obsessive compulsive neighbor GuitarHeronVegas (talk) 22:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC) — GuitarHeronVegas (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Now the mystery comes clearer. The individual who starts the misinformation leaves his IP to a dsl open as its dedicated and currently on (bad mistake) at 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com. Thanks to sattalite photography, i have an actual physical location and address to that line. My friend in Detroit MI is driving there on Monday or Tuesday to sort this out. More info including colorful pictures not to exceed Wiki standards to come.
Admins, the ISBN as well as other information was changed several hours and even to the point of minutes before the article is nominated for deletion. Until the sources are (a) verified and (b) either notable or not has been established, please take out the vandalism here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joel_Kass&diff=prev&oldid=224772436. Why Pater, our faithful Dominican protector admin and Andrew C 'forgot' to mention that the sources had been changed before nominating it for deletion is pretty interesting and...in a twisted way brilliant. The actual sources were made bogus just a few minutes before we start the debate.
Below is my case for sock puppery at 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com and what I believe is the source of clearly bogus information created to confuse those who actually wanted to have a debate on the topic.
After several edits of Abdul,98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com and meatstrain and ryan beta of both the Joel Kass page and the Dominicans, we have meanstrain who edits the same two accounts, followed up by 'AbdulZayed' who not only changes the words to butress the users input at 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com, but also concludes with the following:
It is also important to note that Meatstrain, who I highly respect, has been working many hours to show truth. There are many items in it that are clearly anti-Islamic.198.43.144.124 (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC) - I doubt this person is a Muslim, but if you look at the times, meatstrain, 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com and AbdulZayed literally are working seconds apart. Then, Ryan-beta, our hero in waiting defaces the page. The other IP's listed came back to Comcast in Detroit and Exon Mobile that were traceable for the page. My guess is that they are either (a) all the same person or (b) something out of an Opus Dei movie.[reply]
Then, just as meatstrain has made his case, within just a few seconds we have:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joel_Kass&diff=prev&oldid=224769785 : oh goodness, what a surprise, Abdul who backs up meatstrain that the forums are fake and he has the logs to Yahoo (this is beyond humor that yahoo would hand over ip logs)and amazingly uses the same typeface, sentence structure and much more. What a coicidence.
AbulZayed then goes to assist with the following:
(1) purposely changed the ISBN's to make them bogus so that no one could locate them: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joel_Kass&diff=prev&oldid=224772436 thus, further adding to the bogus charge. Then, he (2)destroyed the citations at the top: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joel_Kass&diff=prev&oldid=224772276 and add some vandalism work, my guess is to pretend unsucessfully as a Muslim and make it look like 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com was just a coincidence . I also found simmilar work with the whole Nacht Der Tanz issue.
Finally, we close on who or what this is. Right after the post from meatstrain about source verification, we have our sole verifier, who only comes on
Is 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com a sock pup or the residence of the author? Its a dedicated dsl line it would seem. I did a google search for adrian+joel kass and adrian+dominican. For Adrian and Dominican, there is an entire company there called the Adrian Dominican Sisters. I have a call into Sister Carleen Maly, OP Director of Vocations, 1257 East Siena Heights Drive. There is some relationship between the two. Anyhow, on Monday i will find out what is the relationship and if either Joel Kass is actually a Dominican Friar or if someone at that place has something to shed some light. I also recieved have 2 of the books coming this week before Abdul/98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com defaced them. More info to come.
All roads end at 98-204-112-64.dsl.tc3net.com. Please have that IP blocked as from the evidence pointed above.
The result was Keep (non-admin closure), there exist lots of game related articles on en-wiki, this one can exist too. Ruslik (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 16:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, default to keep. Wizardman 16:12, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable role playing game. Blowdart | talk 13:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 15:49, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable musical project. Zero hits for the name + Finlayson (the surname of the auteur), zero hits for "Ross Finlayson" + any of the bands which the article claims he was associated. The article's a turgid mess that isn't easy to read and has a couple of attack digs in it, but it sounds like this is a just-barely-post-teen garage outfit of sorts. Probable WP:COI violation, as the creator is User:Themagickreport, for whom this article represents the only edits. Fails WP:MUSIC, WP:V and WP:BIO. RGTraynor 13:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 16:01, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Appears to be a non-notable newspaper. TN‑X-Man 13:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 22:53, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable rapper, fails WP:MUSIC. No sign of any reliable sources, and Googling the name off his various (admittedly self-promoted) albums provide few hits, other than to his Myspace page and a handful of blogposts. Created by a SPA with no other edits. Fails WP:V, WP:BIO. Ravenswing 13:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. Closure is based on strength of arguments presented, not vote counting. PhilKnight (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not cite any reliable sources which attest to the notability of the subject matter, one of the locations that can used as part of game playing and influence some of the in-universe game mechanics included in any of their numerous codexes and Games Workshop-sanctioned expansions. As an individual item or as a collection with locations, none of these items have any real world notability, nor have any of my attempts to find sources to the contrary borne fruit. The notability of this topic cannot be verified by reliable sources, and should deleted as has been done in the past. Allemandtando (talk) 13:08, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because of the rationale given above:
The result was No consensus. BJTalk 23:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article is more suitable for a PC magazine than an encyclopedia, and here I do not mean due to its lack of sources or inappropriate tone. Any relevant info, if any, should be placed in the appropriate article, as, like I've said before, the subject of the article is more suitable for a magazine than an encyclopedia. This is not only for this article, but for many others of the same 'nature'. diego_pmc (talk) 11:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 23:38, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like advertisement for the editor's own (unnotable) game. StaticGull Talk 11:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete --JForget 22:54, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Violates many policy. Does this film even exist?. I tried to find info from everywhere but there is no such movie in existence SkyWalker (talk) 05:09, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep the list, redirect the individual articles to it. I am relisting in lieu of deletion because they are potential search targets, and they may prove to be a source for potentially encyclopedic material that can be merged. Shereth 18:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is comprised solely of indepth detail on fictional characters from the comic book (and later cartoon), Ouran High School Host Club. Is the comic notable? Yes. Is the comic referenceable? Yes. Is this level of detail? No. The article has NO references (fails WP:V, and very probably WP:NOR). There is no verification for this stuff outside primary sources, and synthesizing them in this manner is also not what Wikipedia is for. There is NO reasoning for why and how these characters are notable in and of themselves (fails WP:N).
It's basically a list of random information such as their blood types, and how tall they are, and what kind of music they like, and how fond of sweets they are. This article is nothing but completely random useless fan trivia.
There are also a host of subsubarticles, which are even more indepth - but equally unreferenced - again full of nothing but unverifiable original research and trivia. These are:
I would suggest delete all. Neıl 龱 10:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable D&D Campaign, no evidence of notability, no refs, nada. Blowdart | talk 10:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFF. Shooting has yet to begin. PC78 (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 09:34, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Un-noteworthy neologism. Google brings back 5 hits, all of which point to the same paper. Blowdart | talk 10:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Shereth 18:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article on an FA Cup semi final with nothing to distingush it from any other match, except the fact that it was the first semi-final to go to penalties. If not outright deletion, I would suggest at least a merge to FA Cup 1991-92. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it should be merged — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Hall of England (talk • contribs)
The result was delete. The information is forked from the singles pages, so merging is not needed. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable B-sides. All information is forked from respective singles. Fancruft. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 09:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. While many of the !votes in favor of keep were essentially WP:ILIKEIT, WP:USEFUL, WP:INTERESTING or some other permutation of a non-policy based argument that can generally be dismissed, it has also been argued that the information here is sourced. This debate certainly shows that the article is problematic, I cannot find sufficient will to delete at this time. Whether the ultimate "cure" is future deletion, editorial improvement of the existing article or merging this information elsewhere is yet to be seen, but for better or worse this discussion cannot determine that outcome. Shereth 18:10, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Delete per common sense say's this is a load of gibberish. The articles references are not formatted, many of the sources themselves come from unreliable places. The article is full of pov wording and has as much notability as myself. — Realist2 (Come Speak To Me) 09:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Addition to opening statement This article is in violation of Wikipedia is not a directory—"Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed." indopug (talk) 11:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Keep per the balancing scale in favor of keep lol. Anyway. It could be the same with honorific titles given by the royal family. Example
Honorable titles to artist is no different no matter from company/media/fans if its well known and circulated. The "king/queen/prince/etc." is notable to the title because I dont think the word honor in any form can not be suitable to a King/queen/godfather/etc if given to them. regards Kelvin Martinez (talk) 03:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
P.S Wesley......we need to be on CNN lmao Kelvin Martinez (talk) 21:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is the contributors' (three different contributors - all newcommers) only article and it seems that they are associated with this medical school and are using this page as advertisement. The notability is questionable and this article may even fall under ((db-spam)). Beagel (talk) 09:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Has been founded just 2 years ago and I'm quite sure the second division in Macedonia isn't a pro league. Considering the fact that at least one of their players is just 13 years old, the roster might be the one of a youth team, so maybe their participation in the second division isn't even on a adult level. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 09:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, no reliable sources to be found, no assertion of notability. Delete per WP:BLP. Keeper ǀ 76 21:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This kid is just 13 years old, and according to the fact he plays at center despite being just 6 ft 0 in, his date of birth seems to be no mistake. Google doesn't find anything about him except this article. Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 09:05, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Keeper ǀ 76 21:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable local half-hour radio show. Prod removed without discussion. The article claims that it's "nationally syndicated on iTunes," but with only 40 Google hits [73] (not all pertaining to the show), mostly blogposts and none of them reliable sources, the odds that anyone's noticed seem dim. The only mention of the show at all in the mainstream media is nothing more than a mention in a radio column that the host now had an online podcast. Creator of the article is a SPA with no other edits. Fails WP:V, WP:N. RGTraynor 08:54, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with redirect per above sounds good. not notable enough for it's own article, but might be interesting to someone in parent article.
The result was nominator withdrawal as per this. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 07:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The episode is about little kids that play with rocks so it's non-notable. Schuym1 (talk) 07:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:11, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Game existed as Face of Mankind, closed, announced a new game, the article was updated to match the announced name (FoM: Rebirth), and now the announced game has been cancelled. This can be rolled back to the "dead" original game and kept, or deleted--I don't see that the unreleased game has any notability. Notability for the original, closed game may be weak as well. Jclemens (talk) 20:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*To closing admin, relist since there are only 3 opinions? --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 12:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename to Face of Mankind Not sure why this should be deleted when plenty of other video game articles are up which are way less notable than this. Seriphyn (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete per all delete votes/WP:SNOW--JForget 23:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do not meet WP:ATHLETE or WP:FOOTYN. Only 6 results in Google Caiaffa (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 00:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and is just an in-universe repetition of plot points from various Warhammer 40,000 articles. It is therefore duplicative and trivial, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:29, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The same goes for all the other Warhammer 40,000 sub-articles. --Agamemnon2 (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is a copy of student's report submitted to Vivekanand Education Society. It fails several guidelines and policies including WP:OR and WP:V. It is not sure if it needs its own article in Wikipedia. In case it needed, it will be more easier to write new article from scratch rather than edit and formatting existing one. Beagel (talk) 06:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. Some points: (1) the POV fork argument is flawed: if this article was created to talk about Lyall Howard's activities, that seems entirely appropriate, and any POV issues can be corrected through editing. (2) Notability is not inherited, but this only rebuts a small part of what those arguing to keep are saying. Being related to someone famous doesn't make you automatically non-notable either. (3) No substantial argument weighs against DGG's comment. (4) It seems there is some feeling that the rewrite has made the article better. Mangojuicetalk 20:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Howard's father does not meet notability criteria and I think that will be even more obvious now than at the time of the previous debate which ended as the nomination being withdrawn - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyall Howard - ie the debate was not concluded.
Per Wikipedia:Bio#Invalid_criteria : That person A has a relationship with well-known person B is not a reason for a standalone article on A.
Although the article is referenced and interesting, there is still no independent notability conferred on the subject in my view. If he wasn't John Howard's father he would not have had an article. The lead currently reads Lyall Falconer Howard (1896-1955) was a World War I veteran, engineer and business owner and the father of former Australian Prime Minister, John Howard - if you struck out the last bit - would we have an article on somebody who was a World War I veteran, engineer and business owner? I don't think so. Matilda talk 04:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
EXPANDING ARTICLE: I believe the article has passed the threshold of Wikipedia notability. However, because some (not all) comments (above) said the content is not notable, I will expand the article during the next week. The Lyall Howard story has been covered by innumerable books, newspapers, and magazines, so I will include many new references.--Lester 22:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
on page 747 Carlyon returns to Lyall Howard withPrivate Lyall Howard, the pioneer, wasn't going to change his laconic prose style because something important had happened. For November 11 he wrote two words in his diary: 'Armistice signed.'
In other words what Carlyon has done has used the diary of the father of the PM to offer a window into the ordinary front-line soldier. Carlyion does not mention Lyall Howard extensively. Carlyon is not asserting that Lyall Howard is notable - in fact almost the opposite. Carlyon's choice of the diary of Lyall Howard as opposed to many other diaries available to him was probably based on Lyall's relationship to the then PM given the publication date of the book (2006).Lyall Howard's reaction to the armistice is perhaps more typical than the others mentioned above. Most frontline soldiers seemed to take the news quietly ...
Comment regarding other World Leaders: I was curious about how Wikipedia deals with other world leaders. Here's the result: Margaret Thatcher's father, Tony Blair's father, Bill Clinton's father and mother, Hillary Clinton's father and mother, Barack Obama's father and mother, John McCain's father and mother. Compare the notability of Bill & Hillary's mothers (who are housewives) with Lyall Howard. While it could be argued that the content of other articles has no baring on this one, it shows a precedent. Lyall Howard provides additional notability by his other life events being included in news articles and books. May I also point out that the biography John Winston Howard, by author Peter van Onselen contains 3 pages about the life and activities of Lyall Howard. Regards, --Lester 00:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. There is no evidence that this is the actual title of "Camp Rock 2", so I see no need for a redirect at this time. If the title, with "comebacks", ends up being the working title, then a redirect won't be necessary because the article will at that time be (appropriately) recreated. Keeper ǀ 76 19:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFF. This is speculation about a future film which has not commenced filming. PROD deleted by sole author without explanation. RayAYang (talk) 04:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:25, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I can find no indication that this person exists, and if he does, that he's involved in the roles that are listed here. Searches turn up very minimal results, and a search for "Cesar Hernandez" "Suite Life" - to check the link to one of the shows - came up with three Google hits. I suspect this is a hoax, and should be deleted as such. Tony Fox (arf!) 04:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Consensus has been developed, and reliable sources have been shown proving the article's notability. —Dark talk 13:03, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is an absence of reliable sources which offer significant coverage of this novel, meaning that it fails notability guidelines. Prod removed on the basis of the notability of the author, Eric Idle, but notability is not inherited so the unquetionable notability of Idle does not in any way impart notability onto this book. Otto4711 (talk) 03:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – per L'Aquatique above. It would be astonishing if a novel by Eric Idle received no critical attention when published in 1975. (His The Road to Mars was reviewed/panned in the Times, the Guardian, etc etc - see complete-review.com.) -- roundhouse0 (talk) 20:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The article does not fall under WP:INDISCRIMINATE and the article is indeed encyclopedic and notable. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 07:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unencyclopedic. This article could not ever possibly serve any useful purpose to anyone. Ever. It was prodded just after creation, citing WP:INDISCRIMINATE, and the author removed the prod. — MusicMaker5376 02:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Shereth 17:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A brief kid's TV show promotion that's not remotely notable. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 02:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This article is complete OR, non-noteable, and does not reference any sources. A fringe fusion genre which does not belong on wikipedia Dude101.2 (talk) 02:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect would be fine with me. On another note I won't be able to partake in the dissussion any longer. Vacation Time! Dude101.2 (talk) 04:34, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 17:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Duplication of existing article Liverpool gay quarter. Both Stanley St and gay quarter are notable for exactly the same reason. Michellecrisp (talk) 00:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How long will it take for someone to decide if my articles will stay?, At the moment, if any visitors see the 'delete' tag all over the Stanley Street article, it doesn't look good. (Richie wright1980 (talk) 19:33, 10 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]
The result was delete. Shereth 17:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable page listing one man's failure to achieve notability, reads like an ad Primal (talk) 00:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, clear-cut A7. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced one-liner about (an apparently defunct) department store in Southampton - the English one, presumably - but no indication of notability - has been tagged an orphan since 2006. Time to defunct the article. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 00:16, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Makes no pretence that this entity achieved notability by any criterion. Dolphin51 (talk) 03:24, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. It doesn't look like this band passes WP:MUSIC, even if every word in the article is true. Maybe they're huge in Sweden, but this, this, and this suggests they didn't make much of an impact. Note, this article also exists on the Swedish Wikipedia. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:20, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Jepp, fails music. they should have 2 albums and independant souces to verify notability - they have neither.Yobmod (talk) 10:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was CSD A7 (non-admin closure), housekeeping closure. Protonk (talk) 05:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unnotable band formed in 2008. No references. Has some small assertions of notability though so not A7 worthy. -IcĕwedgЁ (ťalķ) 22:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 04:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, no non-trivial independent sources. The best we have (and the best I could find) are of the type "[...], his attorney, Jim Acho, said." Some of his cases might be notable, he definitely isn't. Huon (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Wizardman 15:45, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A religious leader and a musician, but not a notable one and there are no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 17:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --PeaceNT (talk) 04:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
does not seem to be notable enough either as a footballer or a musician Mayumashu (talk) 23:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Shereth 17:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable comedy troupe. No reliable sources available. Contested prod. BradV 00:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy keep, clear notability. Questionable nom from an SPA. TravellingCarithe Busy Bee 15:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Unknown Canadian business figure fails WP: Notability Ilikebikesandwheels (talk) 12:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC) — Ilikebikesandwheels (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]