The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Weak keep Article has sourcing, and it's just as good as some of the other music stub articles YamakiriTC§07-3-2008 • 22:19:54 22:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only secondary source is trivial. Award is minor. Albums not on notable labels. Fails WP:MUSIC. Duffbeerforme (talk) 05:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Duffbeer. tomasz. 12:25, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Were signed to a notable label, opened for a notable act. It's just a stub that needs to be improved. Blindeffigy (talk) 05:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. The award is minor, the record label is non-notable, opening for a big act isn't one of the criteria, as notability is not inherited. Just not quite enough yet to pass WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with the points above, doesnt pass WP:MUSIC. --neon whitetalk 01:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.