The result was speedily deleted by User:NawlinWiki as A7. --ais523 08:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
This seems to be a non-notable online gaming group. It might have a possible connection with the graphic novel Silent Assassin Clamster5 17:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A one time mention isn't very useful. Appears to be useless and just fancruft. RobJ1981 00:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another Amalgam fancruft. Amalgam was a short lived series, and it doesn't need pages for things only mentioned a few times and never shown/never fully shown.RobJ1981 00:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Dakota 19:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A minor software development kit. A Google search says it has 26,000 hits, but only 52 are unique. The website's Alexa rank is somewhere near two million, and there are no independent third party publications about the kit or anything derived from it, making it unverifiable. This software doesn't meet criteria in WP:SOFTWARE and doesn't seem to meet inclusion criteria regarding notability in general. Wafulz 00:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was consensus to keep the article. There are some things AfD can't buy. For everything else, there's deletion review. - Mailer Diablo 04:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
AfD 2nd Listing. Recommend delete per WP:BIO. The article makes no claim of notability. The 1st AfD had very little participation and probably should have been re-listed rather than closed. The only argument in the article's talk page for keeping this article is that there are thousands of worse stubs. That's too bad, but as per long-standing "there are worse..." arguments, let's continue the cleanup efforts - and we can begin with this one. If this guy is notable, let's see it. Otherwise, let's delete this article. Rklawton 00:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close - this is an entirely inappropriate nomination. If the nominator is unhappy with the recent AfD close he should use WP:DRV not this unprocedural nomination. TerriersFan 01:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment - The nominator has now removed the references from the article. This is ridiculous behaviour. TerriersFan 02:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 18:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Son of a minor character, not even directly mentioned in the series. Simply a guess at who the next King of Narnia was after Frank I. Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 01:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 03:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable web "model". speedy tag removed by original author. Onorem 00:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. It seems like there probably will be no or little opposition to this, so I'm ending this AfD early after a consensus of keep was reached. --Nishkid64 20:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Listcruft and just a gallery of images. No article -Nv8200p talk 01:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per Criteria for Speedy Deletion A7 "non-notable biography" - Tangotango 12:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This (auto)biographical article does not conform to WP:BIO. This is just some freelance journalist who has written a page about himself in an apparent attempt to increase his exposure (he's also going around plugging himself by inserting mentions, quotations and links to his articles throughout wikipedia - see the linkspam in the user's contrib history) The article does not mention any widely recognized contributions in the person's field, and though he may have had some work published, it still doesn't fall into the WP:BIO requirement of having had "multiple independent reviews or awards." Bri 02:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as nonsense by Jeffrey O. Gustafson. --Aaron 02:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article links to a seemingly nonexistent product, Safari for Windows, and makes wild claims about the product, i.e. its speed and security. The links provided do not work, and the whole thing looks to be nonsense. perardi 02:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete.DS 18:07, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
All this has is (probably copyrighted) definitions for the words party and tray. They want to transwiki this to Wiktionary:party, which has those meanings already. Useless page to exist. --Dangherous 02:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was kept. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable; contest appears to be defunct anyway. —Psychonaut 02:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Supposedly a slang term meaning sluttily-dressed underage girl. But Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. Well, maybe up to a certain extent it is...but this to me is not a notable slang term. I'm sure there's a redirect somewhere. This article is just over one year old. --Dangherous 02:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating this and 6 other articles as not notable:
All are models on Deal or No Deal but with no significant role in either acting/modelling/hosting etc outside this show. Fine line as to which should be nominated... other DOND models can be found in this template: Template: DOND USA Models. I have chosen the most obvious articles to nominate (thinking back to the ANTM train wreck) and others may follow.
Notes on the other models and why they were not nominated.
I am fairly inexperienced at nominating things here and may not be interpreting the notability guidelines completely correctly but I thought it was worth a shot! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 00:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was purged, and then redirected as per Smerdis. DS 18:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research, no citations, a single link which is to the 'creators' geocities page, "Created by two computer science university students"... need I say more? StealthFox 02:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A webcomic, found here, written by what appears to be the webcomic artist User:Wolfsilvermoon. Pretty much everything on the free web host comic genesis is non-notable, even their top ranked comics are unencyclopedic. This one however, is ranked at 775. Wikipedia is not a web directory. Try Comixpedia or the CGWiki. - Hahnchen 02:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another webcomic found on the free web host comicgenesis, this one can be seen here. It's ranked at around 30 on Comic Genesis, so some of you might be fooled into thinking it's somehow notable. It's not. This puts it behind Yosh! and slightly in front of Gorgeous Princess Creamy Beamy. This is no way as popular as sites such as Encyclopedia Dramatica or Pokemon-Safari.com. Indeed, the lackadaisical standards to which we hold webcomics to are laughed at in unrelated discussions. Fails WP:WEB, WP:V. - Hahnchen 02:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirected. MER-C 08:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have merged the content with Temptation (game show) as the article was short and did not warrant it's own page. AFD Template 1 has been added for the page. The page can now be deleted because it's no longer in use. Lakeyboy 02:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted under CSD A7 by MacGyverMagic. MER-C 10:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:BIO and no assertion of notability. The web site shown only contains Flickr, Blogspot, and DeviantArt links. Google is no help. Crystallina 03:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete. Yanksox 01:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Charby the Vampirate was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charby The Vampirate. This is a multiple nomination as it also includes the webcomic character Zeno (Demon). Reasons for the nomination are similar to the original, that this webcomic, seen here is not notable. The entire Drunk Duck community and audience isn't that great, with the free web host getting an Alexa rank of 75,000. This is just one of the many comics on it, and googling it gives you no reliable sources upon which to write an encyclopedia article. Fails WP:WEB, fails WP:V. - Hahnchen 03:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The people who deleted this are fucking idiots.
The result was delete. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This megaman fan fiction sprite comic, found on the free web host Drunk Duck, can be seen here. There is no assertion of notabilty, and there are 10 Google links for "Megaman The Megamissions". - Hahnchen 03:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was DE! *clap clap* LETE! *clap clap* DS 18:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of songs featuring hand claps is overly long, unverified, and possibly endless. Many songs have the musicians clap their hands and I'm not sure a song become known for that. That said if it could be limited to songs where hand clapping is central to the song I might be persuaded to change my mind.--T. Anthony 03:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not voting, maybe I'm wrong about it. It just seems long, unverified, and possibly endless. I'm amenable to withdrawing this on suitable justification though.--T. Anthony 03:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Set of ads for a Phoenix restaurant. Author (based on name, the owner) has also added links into numerous articles like Fast food advertising ([6]), Hamburger ([7]), and Theme restaurant ([8]). I don't see any indication this restaurant meets WP:CORP, and the series of articles (especially creating an article on their fastest burger eater) strikes me as WP:SPAM. -- Fan-1967 03:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Heart Attack Grill was the subject of:
If any further supportive information is needed, please ask.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonbasso (talk • contribs)
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN house that hasn't existed for 150 years. Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 03:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete - I looked at the points made for retention and looked at the article. Nothing asserts any significance to the power station - it simply has - the output statistics the plant, and also some peripheral info about the meterological circumstances of the area, and some eniginerring stats about the actual structure. I actually know of a few high schools in my city which have a token 2-3 wind turbines and I can't see how 56 is a "signficant investment" unless Iowa is in the stone age, which I believe it is not. Also Truthbringer's point about the news info has been countered (to be honest, if one line is enough, then high school kids who win math/science competitions would also be notable (they aren't)). As for the hydrodams, they usually require a lot of deforestration and also are usually 1km wide (or something massive), whereas these are a few sticks in the ground. Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 07:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN.... uh.... wind farm. Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 16:58, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity entry of non-notable film. No distributor, no IMDb entry, all redlinks. Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was kept without prejudice against a consensus merge/redirect. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The very nature of this article violates WP:NPOV. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 04:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Crumbsucker 12:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiace 19:58, 22 September 2006 (CST)
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT a crystal ball. There are 81 unique Google hits, most of which are from forums/blogs.[9] None of the results nor the link on the talk page establishes notability of this game. Even the creator's text indicates little is known about the game. Perhaps an article will be appropriate when information is known. Erechtheus 04:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And that's not even the entire list. What you're doing is assuming bad faith in the sources that I am providing. 2ch is the source of much news from Japan, especially from the Famitsu magazine. Do you have a reasoning for why 2ch is not trustworthy? Or why this magazine scan, with incredible detail, screenshots from the game and information from the game, is not a good source? Do you see any single sign that the magazine has been altered in any way imagineable? If not, do not denounce it, treat it as if it wasn't fake, like you do with any decent source. - A Link to the Past (talk) 07:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How is this not verifiable? Shall I point out how a whopping none of the people voting delete have even given an ioda of reason to assume that the scan is fake or incorrect? There is no reason to assume that it's fake other than the fact that we do not know what scan it is from.
However, I have done research and can confirm that this is Weekly Jump. It uses a similar style to other Jump magazines, and Weekly Jump is usually the magazine to first confirm a new Naruto game (similar to CoroCoro Comics and Pokémon Diamond and Pearl). This is hardly a bad source. If we do not assume that this magazine scan is a fake, it provides plenty of information. It is not some mysterious game that's nothing more than a name, system and genre; we have screenshots, details on what the touch screen will look like, some of the characters that are available, the visuals (full 3D fighter), the release date (TBA 2006) and other information that can't be assertained from the screenshots. And then we've got the fact that it's published by Takara Tomy. If we got somebody who can read Japanese, we'd have even more information. And if you claim that a scan cannot be a source - if it were uploaded to Wikipedia, it would not need a source to show it exists; because the user could look at the scan and know it exists. - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--Dboocock 14:56, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Keep http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-17-71-2-74-17a-49-en.html[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Gamecruft at best, provides no useful information to the reader and appears to simply duplicate material from the game manual. Per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is not a collection of such information. Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 05:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article contains no real content, and a Google search reveals not much information -- links only to YouTube, Wikipedia mirrors, and blogs. Non-notable and unverifiable. - CheNuevara 05:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Site doesn't come close to WP:WEB, user's edits have all been used to promote the site/company, article is spammy bit of trivia in any case. 2005 05:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a game guide, per WP:NOT Also is WP:OR. I vote Delete Hemhem20X6 06:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 18:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This stub about Hon. Sir Thomas Carling, which has had numerous edits since its creation in June 2005, actually states the key biographical facts of prominent Canadian government figure Sir John Carling who already has a full biographical entry in Wikipedia. In that article, there is a link to John's father, "Thomas Carling", which takes us to this duplicative entry about John Carling's life. The real "Thomas Carling" is not considered notable enough to have any biographical entries in any reference sources. Romanspinner 06:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 15:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
International Assault article has been deleted, therefore this article serves no purpose Normy132 03:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:08, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recommending delete. Article appears to be about a non-notable organisation in the Channel Islands which offers legal advice or quasi legal advice for a fee. Author of an article (who may be a newbie) seems to have an unlikeable propensity for removing comments from talk pages that he doesn't like. Legis 07:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK people - lets be a little dynamic - Mircosoft's website is an advert but the entry is useful for other reasons. Similarly this word is actaully being consider for inclusion in the Oxford concise for 2006 entry. There is some interesting academic debate about the origins, I wrote it up in a very simple way which may be suggestive of advertising but I was following exsisting Wiki protocols. Perhaps some of you may be able to encapsulate or re-write it better than me to address the debate over the term its history and correct usage. --Alexwebpro 12:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No certainly not Nigel and I was not immediately aware that I had done that when I first edited, so point taken. But what is interesting Nigel is how so many new terms are coming into exsistance and how slow the print editions are to capture them. I recently came across the word 'Bigsmall'which is currently the subject of a car advert but also very similar to the Notorious B.I.G's name Biggie Smalls. Now of course if you look up the definition of that word you will no doubt come across Toyota. I think this raises funadamental questions about where one draws the line. To all of you above try typing 'bigsmall' into google and I am confident that you will come across alot that is connected with Toyota. This could be seen as a form of viral marketing. And yet the word still has meaning independent of the now infamous advertising campaign. My arguement is that 'Legalsoup' falls into this same catagory.--Alexwebpro 13:47, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A biography for a nn writer. More of a promo piece for Child of Chaos, which, assertion aside, appears to be the author's only book. Dragonfly Media Publishing, described as the publisher of Hamilton's "books" is actually a provider of editing and layout services for self-published authors. The novel is available through vanity press lulu.com. Victoriagirl 07:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 19:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Complete bollocks. Fails to meet just about every criterion for an article. Someone's personal musings. Not much else to be said, really. Perhaps the fact that the author of the article has "licensed" his "theory" under the GPL (and says so in the article) should prove beyond doubt that this is original pseudophysics/pseudophilosophy "research". Byrgenwulf 07:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm all for putting stuff on Wikipedia that die-hard Wikipedians consider unencyclopedic, but do we really need one for "The name people use in Garry's Mod when they haven't changed their name"? I mean, for crissake, it's the old-fashioned "Player" problem. There ain't no need for it on Wikipedia. (BTW, if I'm really screwing this up, I'm sorry. This sort of thing is a but daunting...) Scumbag 08:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
DGG - 25 September 2006 Do not delete, it's usefull information, it teaches you something, and you're just a jackass anyways if you want to bother to delete something like this, like "OMG It's a small article that you will only find if you search for it, it must be the deleted or the wikipedia is teh brokenzor and ccannot be teh healed again!
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This "unstudied" and "hypothetical" phenomenon fails the policies on verifiability, original research, and reliable sources, and is utter tripe to boot. Byrgenwulf 08:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. --- Glen 09:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod contested by article creator. Football umpire. Herostratus 08:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was -KEEP clearly no reason to delete, WP:SNOW. -GTBacchus(talk) 09:41, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod contested by article creator. Football umpire. Herostratus 08:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Author contested speedy but has been significantly improved since then. Still don't think it meets WP:MUSIC. MER-C 09:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So what should be done to the article, then? The appearance is good now, but I take it that the band is not good enough :) ? Well it's quite true that the band is not Metallica-big-and-famous, but it's done a quite notable career to their first album and recording deal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimtuomi (talk • contribs)
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not meet the notabiltity criteria. Clt13 09:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Advert. Non notable fails WP:CORP.Bad article title. Dweller 09:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was flagged as copyvio. MER-C 11:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Notability per WP:N of this pigeon breeders club (if that's what the subject actually is? or is it the breed?). Content from [13], apparently posted by the author of that page. Prod removed, but no attempt to improve, wikify or cleanup since page was created. Clappingsimon talk 10:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, due to lack of sourcing and evidence of use. Petros471 16:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article lacks notability and to a lesser extent, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Senordingdong 10:23, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Previous Afd was closed as "no consensus", however this was also an Afd on 2008-09 in English football. Although I feel that article could also be deleted, this one certainly should be since it clearly falls under WP:NOT and contains no useful information, nor can it for a considerable amount of time. QmunkE 10:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to human echolocation --- Deville (Talk) 15:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally prodded by Rey Brujo with the following text:
Unluckily, being the first one to get a Wii is not enough to become notable for Wikipedia. Thousands are featured in several TV shows, but that doesn't mean it is necessary to have his article. The notability guidelines give two guides that may be applied: Persons achieving renown or notoriety for their involvement in newsworthy events (appearing on a TV program or getting a Wii before launch date aren't a newsworthy event) and The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person. (Multiple similar stories describing a single day's news event only count as one coverage.) (which is what is happening with him).
I'm personally not quite sure about whether or not this qualifies as a single day's news event, nor am I convinced that TV appearances such as the Ellen Degeneres show are non newsworthy. Thus I am posting this debate for the full AfD review Roninbk 10:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A project which existed for six months and failed to produce anything. Is this actually of any importance? I can't see any. Guy 10:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a website that does not assert notability. MER-C 11:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was flagged as copyvio. MER-C 11:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested "prod", although the original author User:Peterconover did not remove the "prod". Reason for prod: Vanity page, possible copyright violation. Aleph-4 11:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:18, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A contested PROD, this comic appears to be published nowhere. A question about where it might be found has languished, unanswered, on the talk page for a week. Joyous! | Talk 11:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The topic is a throw-away jokey neologism from a novel for a mad-scientist torch. While funny, the quote may be copyvio. In addition, there is the usual nn blogcruft. Leibniz 11:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per Criteria for Speedy Deletion G1 ("patent nonsense") - Tangotango 12:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please! This is pointless, to say the very least! This is just taking up space on a great website for nothing. Dtxn 00:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete both, original research, author created four articles based solely on his own nonnotable MA thesis. NawlinWiki 14:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be original research -- the article creator's own theory about class organization. This theory does not seem to be recognized or supported by other sources. FreplySpang 11:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating Religiousproletariat, a coordinating article created by the same author, based on the same theory. FreplySpang 11:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 19:34, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is extremely poorly written, contains information taken from other articles, and is about nothing other than a website that lists strip clubs. Clearly, this was written to promote a website and not for any informational purpose. The user User:Alan harada spammed multiple articles with external links on the same day this article was created. I hereby nominate it for deletion as it contains little information and is clearly designed to promote a website. Monkeybreath 23:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per Criteria for Speedy Deletion A7 (unremarkable group) - Tangotango 12:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. DS 18:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. Various other attempts to delete by speedy (and otherwise), but none asking the general Wikipedia community for their opinions. Mike Peel 12:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Obscure occultist. Notability not asserted. Leibniz 12:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable collectible card player. Does not meed criteria at WP:BIO. Violates WP:BLP due to not being sourced. Delete -- Malber (talk • contribs) 12:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as I see at least two criteria for which this person applies. See number 1 (widely recognized) and number 5(professional league or equivalent). There is a pro-tour level play league, and even a Hall of Fame. FrozenPurpleCube 13:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 00:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is merely a collection of information and thus violates WP:NOT. It also lacks sources to justify it's notability outside the realm of Magic:The Gathering. Delete -- Malber (talk • contribs) 12:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable per WP:WEB. 21 articles since 1st Jan says a lot. Dweller 13:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is intended as a short article which will provide the reader with an understanding of the wikispiracy project.
I was somewhat amazed at the overzealous rapidity of this marking for deletion. I think the actual article was up for literally seconds before it was earmarked for annihilation. At least this provides evidence that the Wikipedia is an active thriving community.
I also respect the Wikipedia for being an open project. It is a project built upon open source software and open thinking. No corporation nor any government could have created such a successful project as the wikipedia which largely survives on the free energy and enthusiasm of unpaid yet very loyal people. Irrespective of what the wikipedian community has decided of and about itself, there is indeed an uplifting and empowering feeling that comes from such success. zorg 16:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This project went live 15 September 2006. It runs entirely on open source software including mediawiki-1.6.8 using PHP 4 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zorgrian (talk • contribs) 11:01, 18 September 2006.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
He does not meet WP:BIO. "Planting churches" might be a notable and important activity to the people who attend those churches, but for the rest of the world it's just not a significant achievement. -IceCreamAntisocial 13:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod about a non-notable website. MER-C 13:17, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep, WP:POINT. Kusma (討論) 14:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable collectible card player. Does not meed criteria at WP:BIO. Violates WP:BLP due to not being sourced. Not notable outside the realm of Magic:The Gathering. Delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Malber (talk • contribs) .
The result was speedy keep, nom withdrawn. Mangojuicetalk 16:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An unneeded disambiguation page, and one previously deleted: Mong (AfD). All three uses given are basically slurs; encyclopedic uses of those terms will be extremely rare. (See Spong for one of two examples that uses "mong"). The existence of this page, when it isn't useful as a disambiguation page, amounts to a dicdef. Mangojuicetalk 13:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
An eighth Mortal Kombat title may be under development, but this article appears to be complete speculation, with no sources to back it up. RobWill80 13:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested WP:PROD. Depending on how notable astrologers are, potential speedy deletion candidate per WP:CSD#A7 for not sufficiently asserting notability of the subject. Original PROD concern was "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. The article as it stands doesn't explain why Davison is notable, per Wikipedia notability criteria. Searching Google didn't turn up a single external reference to her work.". Delete unless reliable sources show the person's notability. Kusma (討論) 13:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:19, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In an attempt to stop advertising at List of webcomics, a requirement is that all links must lead to an article. So when this webcomic was removed for having no article, the obvious thing to do is to create one, and then return to webspamming. This article asserts no claim to notability, the webhost has no Alexa rank and the article reads like the advert that it is. - Hahnchen 13:37, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep (bad faith), nominator is annoyed about the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy St. Clair and is taking it out on Magic player articles. Mangojuicetalk 14:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was kept after a previous nomination for deletion, however there have been no substantial reliable sources included to substantiate this subject's notability. Much of the article is original research. Inclusion of this private person's biography is unsuitable per WP:BLP. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 13:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge and redirect to Milwaukee School of Engineering --- Deville (Talk) 16:01, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this university program is notable enough to have it's own entry on WP (I might be wrong :)) -- lucasbfr talk 14:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Redirect is optional. - Mailer Diablo 15:43, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a good faith deletion. I promise. While this name is fabulous, the article makes no reference to anything notable this person has done. So what if she carries a picture of her dead dad (the INXS dude) around. OK, her parents are famous (Paula Yates and Michael Hutchence) but this article doesn't talk about Tiger Lily, apart from where her name comes from. Plus, she's only ten and few ten year olds have done anything famous - Some ppl will name some now, but don't bother. Her sister Peaches Geldof deserves an article cos she has done shows. But not Tiger Lily, imho. --Dangherous 14:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC) Dangherous 14:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article on an elementary school (the editors'?} in Canada, with no reason given why this subject is noteworthy (other than to the children who go to the school and their parents). There are more elementary schools throughout the world than there are articles in Wikipedia. Unless a grade school is really noteworthy (ie. Columbine High School), it should not be the subject of a Wiki article. Askolnick 14:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete g1, nonsense, India place name article moved to Gurh. NawlinWiki 15:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is sheer invention. The article on the real place in India by this name, that should be renamed here after this article has been deleted, is at User:Ganeshbot/sandbox/Gurh. (Renaming requires that this article be deleted first, in order to make way.) In addition to my nomination, this article was also ((prod))ded by 89.57.7.182 (talk · contribs) with the rationale "joke?, google has almost no hits for that use of the term, example: "oh gurh" has only 4 hits including this site". Uncle G 14:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Centrx→talk • 00:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
The result was Keep. Molerat 09:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable collectible card player. Article does not include references to substantiate notability beyond realm of Magic:The Gathering. Unsuitable for inclusion per WP:BLP of private persons. Does not meet criteria of WP:BIO. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 14:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
contribs) 17:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. —Centrx→talk • 00:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
The result was argh, delete! - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() |
Dates shown are the date on which the debate started.
Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates:
|
The result was Speedy delete, author blanked page. NawlinWiki 20:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn notable fails WP:BIO, failed Ghits, probable vanity (authors name is Vegas) Shella ° 15:20, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Energy vampire. There is nothing here to merge, and at least the target article makes it clear how scientific we're being. --- Deville (Talk) 16:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? This goes far beyond 'not citing sources'... --InShaneee 15:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing wrong with the article. Calm down. There is speculation among fans about Persephone's status as an empathic vampire because she was able to sense emotions during the club scene and at various points demanded kisses as payment, particularly specifing passionate kisses from which she recieved apparent satisfaction.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable collectible card players. Article is unsourced. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 15:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing a nomination. Rationale was given as edit summary: "Nominated for deletion. Absurdly general, very presence of article (segregated from other Famous Figures in History) gives credence to male chauvanism." No !vote from me. (Liberatore, 2006). 15:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A POV magnet. We already have Islamic extremist terrorism, Islamic fundamentalism, Islamofascism, Militant Islam, etc... Also note that the newly created article is just a list of Suras which may imply violence. The rest is purely OR.-- Szvest 15:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No evidence of passing WP:WEB, not so many sites links to this one [20]. (Liberatore, 2006). 15:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article has been prod'ed, de-prodded, speedied, de-speedied, discussed on the talk page, etc. It's not clear to me whether its subject meets WP:BIO, so let us discuss it. (Liberatore, 2006). 15:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. Glen 05:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable condominium (Liberatore, 2006). 16:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 19:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
100% spam. Parent company might also need to be AfD'd but going for the non-notable products first. Storkk 16:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
100% spam. Does not meet WP:SOFTWARE. Parent company might also need to be AfD'd but going for the non-notable products first. (See above discussions) Storkk 16:26, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 20:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable online restaurant guide; fails WP:WEB Tom Harrison Talk 16:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as word-for-word repost of deleted material (see previous AFD). Wickethewok 18:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, really poor Google results (31 unique, 222 total), already been deleted once, doubt it meets WP:WEB, etc... - makomk 16:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete. Comes up first in a Yahoo search. Creativity magazine is a mainstream magazine: Print Circulation of 32,276 [22].Gregoryashadwick 10:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Petros471 16:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable beta stage website. Alexa rank 180,461, fails critera of WP:WEB. Haakon 16:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
notability questioned as 13 links come up in search, some are mirrors of this Wikipedia article; addition could be seen to bolster support for critics of Jehovah's Witnesses as the template box was added to the article and it is linked in many different JW-related articles - CobaltBlueTony 16:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 15:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:RS and WP:BIO. Possibly notable by virtue of being the mother of Barbara Bush and a rumor of having an affair with Dwight Eisenhower, but these things alone aren't a basis for an article. Simões (talk/contribs) 16:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Withdrawn. The article is still a sourceless mess, but Pauline Robinson is probably notable herself. I'll just put up a handful of shiny tags to complain about this and that. Simões (talk/contribs) 03:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable computer game; The relatively few Google hits are primarily links to a paintball supplies store by the same name or to this article. Haakon 16:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus has already been formed on Talk:Agassi's last two years. I'm moving that page to this debate's talk page to preserve the debate. Mangojuicetalk 20:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was originally part of the main article Andre Agassi, and was cut and pasted out of that article as being too lengthy, not objective and too much non-notable play-by-play detail. Consensus on article's discussion page appears to be that this article should be deleted and any relevant information merged into Andre Agassi. Dugwiki 16:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable church, written in a first person format. Obviously a vanity page. I abstain from the vote. Clamster5 17:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. —Celestianpower háblame 16:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Living person that does not meet WP:BIO guidelines. Only 319 ghits [23], most of which are about different persons of the same name. The subject is nn, who would probably only have one or two hits from online church directories if it weren't for the very few news articles online about his recent conviction. (Indeed, this article has itself become the top hit for the name "Denis Forde" on Google.) Aaron 17:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:27, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be an article about a boat. And not a big cruise liner boat, but a 30ft tug. Since we don't seem to have notability guidelines for boats I thought we had better run this by AFD and establish a precedent. DJ Clayworth 17:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 15:36, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Possible vanity article. No sources, nothing links to it, non-notable subject Blue Lilac 17:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 16:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is too trivial to deserve an article. If it can go go in, many more similar trivia need to go in. Like Mooppar, Poola Chettan, Rubber Chetan, Kammal, Thamburan, Atiyan, Kettiyon, Kettiyol, Annachi, Valacheruman, Moyiliaru, Ummachi, Ithatha etc. Kuntan 17:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Praka123 23:10, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy close. AFD is not the place for merge requests. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this article is not notable outside the scope of the Ted Bundy case, and the content of this article is limited to the subject's role in the Ted Bundy case. Accordingly, I recommend Merge/Redirect. Cribcage 18:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non notable Kuntan 18:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep and remind Herostratus to use correct metaphors. — CharlotteWebb 17:57, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Is a man who was one of 23 people executed in the state of Ohio in the last 7 years really that notable? In addition, there are sources given, but I don't think most of the content is in those sources. It is mostly unverifiable and reads like an original narrative of the proceedings. I don't know of the author's relation to this case, but if you look at the article talk page, the author says s/he witnessed the execution. Delete as non-notable and unreferenced. Metros232 13:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was the author requested its deletion (via e-mail.) Grandmasterka 05:13, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Musician. While he has played with people who have played in bands that have Wikipedia articles, he hasn't played in those bands himself, except for Pretty Mary Sunshine, which is not exactly the Beatles -- it was up for AfD earlier this year, and, while it survived, it's kind of hard to see why. And it's not like he's been a sideman for Miles Davis or something; all the people he's played with are basically local Seattle music-scene types. I don't see being a member of very short-lived and marginal band rates an article, nor does the notability of the bands composed of people he played with before or after their membership rub off on him. But it's not a slam-dunk either. NOTE: Do not confuse this person with the radio-talking-head Jerry O'Neill who recently had his article deleted. Different people. Herostratus 18:40, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Collectible card players do not meet notability at WP:BIO. No sources cited to substantiate notability outside realm of M:TG -- Malber (talk • contribs) 18:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:16, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A self-published novel by a nn author (Michelle Hamilton, also the subject of an AfD). Little more than an advertisement, clearly in violation of WP:NPOV. Victoriagirl 18:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep ~Kylu (u|t) 00:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable collectible card game player per WP:BIO. Article does not include sources to substantiate notability outside realm of M:TG. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 18:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Partial AfD, listed but not tagged properly. This is a procedureal nomination, I have not read the article. Herostratus 18:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT "Wikipedia is not the place to honor departed friends and relatives. Subjects of encyclopedia articles must have a claim to fame besides being fondly remembered." Another man, Curtis Dagenais, was "accused of the murder of two RCMP officers and the attempted murder of another." The Curtis Dagenais article was nominated for deletion on July 2006 and the result of the discussion was keep. Marc Bourdages, besides being one of Curtis's alleged victims, is not notable per WP:BIO. Prod remover claims notability, but as of writing, no sources for notability have been posted. Delete ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 11:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested A7 speedy. Band vanity about a group with a couple of self-produced releases. A Google search[26] finds a MySpace page, a number of bulletin board/web forum entries, and a mention in an article about another band, but nothing resembling a reliable source. No indication in the article that the group meets the WP:MUSIC guidelines. --Allen3 talk 20:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 15:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The articles subject is not notable, he is merely one of many prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay. The lack of information in the article goes to support this. The article is primarily made up of Combatant Trial information and nothing about the articles subject but his name and prisoner ID numebr to mark him as notable. NuclearUmpf 18:32, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
--NuclearUmpf 21:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete - OR concerns trump any lack of clear consensus.Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 07:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem notable (no lasting impact even at the school where it happened); request to be kept as a forum for discussion in the context of a class project seems to at least border on original research. Jaeger5432 21:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was delete all. - Mailer Diablo 15:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nonnotable "virtual television network" (i.e., a website where people can post homemade TV shows made from clips of real shows). Delete this and all "shows" listed in the article:
NawlinWiki 21:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I find this series to be very interesting and worth keep here on wikipedia. The internet is the only place where the little guy can be read by a large audience. If you take Fempiror (and all the other MZP entries), you will make these works that much less accessible. Phil
.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Allegedly famous internet entrepreneur. Both he and supposed partner generate zero relevant google hits. At best, unverifiable; most likely pure hoax. -- Fan-1967 21:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete, WP:BAND refers. (aeropagitica) 10:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This band is not yet notable. Naturenet | Talk 21:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete G4, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Island Census and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Island Census (Lost). Deleted by User:Bhadani. ColourBurst 03:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is an exact copy of this TV IV page. It contains a great deal of speculation, cites no sources, and is redundant due to the Characters of Lost page. Jtrost (T | C | #) 21:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find any reference to this paradox. Not a single hit on Google. References not provided despite mention of 'critics'. {context} and {prod} removed without comment. Deletion on grounds of WP:NFT? Marasmusine 21:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
NN series of blogs and YouTube videos. Google throws up a little, but there is not enough here to count this as verifiable or notable. Delete J Milburn 21:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed by anon. Apparently a fashion brand that doesn't exist yet. (Earlier version of article said the line would debut in 2007.) Fails WP:V, WP:CORP. Can't verify the company even exists, much less is notable. -- Fan-1967 22:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7, third attempt to recreate this vanity bio. NawlinWiki 04:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bio that to me just doesn't qualify for an article, as I did a search on the guy's name and nothing came up. -- P.B. Pilhet 22:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC), Newpage Patrol[reply]
The result was speedy deleted G4 by User:MONGO. --ais523 11:11, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
((AFDAnon)) I doubt this is real, but then again, there are entities with 'Royal' in the name which are notable. Anyhow, this is nominated for deletion as a suspected hoax. --LiverpoolCommander 22:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
— Possible single purpose account: Vaolza (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
— Possible single purpose account: Annamoine (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
— Possible single purpose account: Horsurfc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
— Possible single purpose account: Wolasa (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
— Possible single purpose account: PLEEEASE (talk • contribs) has made few or no other contributions outside this topic.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Individual clubs at small colleges are not notable; there can't possibly be an article's worth of encyclopedic knowledge on this or most any other college club out there. CheNuevara 22:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:15, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seems non-notable and does not seem to match WP:WEB (well according to my searching about the site on the web). Charlesknight 23:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Echalone 00:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This fictional event does not meet the requirements of WP:WEB as the only sources provided are from the topic's webpage itself, failing WP:RS. Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 11:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Un-encyclopedic cruft. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's not un-encyclopedic, it was featured on many networks shortly after Bob Hope's death.
The result was delete. Punkmorten 20:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod about a non-notable MMORPG. Also contains crystal ball material. MER-C 13:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, no record deal, music shareware. Was deleted on the Finnish WP. Neofelis Nebulosa (моє обговорення) 23:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable radio host. Peephole 15:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I tried following the links to deletion review to know avail what happened to the discussion on this??? The guy is relevant and has been syndicating his show since 1973 ! The "radio station" mentioned above by Punkmorten is ONE network he is on (GCN)(he is also on RBN-Republic Broadcasting www.rbnlive.com and other stations that pick up his show as listed even on wikipedia which dont even now exist but Derry is on the air every day !)- [[27]] It might be irrelivant to those who think everything that means anything originates in NYC or Hollyweird. 209.209.140.21 07:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No demonstration of notability, independant or otherwise. Feature film not distributed. Prod tag removed, the only change to the article being the removal of the admission that the film is seeking distribution. Drat (Talk) 23:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as a crystal ball article. Can be recreated when appropriate press releases & other official news sources are available. (aeropagitica) 10:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT a crystal ball. Prod was removed on the basis that the creator has announced this sequel. There is no cited source for that claim nor the claim in the article that a sequel is probable. In addition, there is no apparent source for that claim out of the 16 unique Google hits for the film name and the creator's name. [28] Erechtheus 23:28, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 10:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see any reason why this person is notable enough for wikipedia. Chris M. 23:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Webcomic with no claim of notability. No reliable sources given/found. ~1 mil Alexa ranking. Delete as not meeting WP:WEB, WP:V, etc... Wickethewok 23:44, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Merge with Dawson College shooting. —Centrx→talk • 00:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't wish to be insensitive, but the sole claim to notability here the reason for this woman's death. She's already named in the Dawson College shooting article. The bit about coming back to shoot her repeatedly is not mentioned in the only source listed. I don't think this is a particularly encyclopedic article. eaolson 23:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A minor project about "misconceptions" around who invented what. This is its website. It has no Alexa rank and no links. Zero reliable sources and no news mentions exist. The site is not notable under WP:WEB and the article is not verifiable. As a last argument, I don't think this site could ever have been remotely popular or notable solely because of its extremely awkward layout (one small, unsizeable window). --Wafulz 23:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:52, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article is a hoax. Please see Talk:Greg_Hawkins. Another Wikipedian 23:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a hoax or a non-notable neologism. There are 2 Google hits for the title, neither of which has anything to do with the subject matter of the article. [30] De-prodded without change or comment. Erechtheus 23:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is completely true. It is a new name for the article, that is why it is not well known. Please do not delete this article because it can be very informative to individuals wishing to stretch out before sporting events or any form of exercise.
I first heard of the Evan Handlers stretch four years ago while attending a course on cheerleading instruction. The stretch is both effective, and as said above "beneficial." I don't understand why a person would say that the issue is "not the truth, but the appropriateness" of the subject. How does one decide what is appropriate for Wikipedia, when encyclopedias are supposed to be limitless wealths of knowledge. Excluding valid information from Wikipedia seems detrimental to the very mission of the website.
Erechthues' claims are obviously bias becuase he has not heard of or used this stretch before. Please Erechtheus before you continue your arguement think about what you are saying and know that this stretch is real. I have been using this stretch for many years now and i would like to share it with a mass amount of people. Please do not delete this article because as the person above said it is a new name for this article.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Even if this is a notable neologism, it's still a dictionary definition and unlikely to ever be expanded beyond that state. Powers T 16:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 09:44, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable, general poor quality. Explodicle 23:52, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) 09:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Non-notable individual who is listed as having claimed an extinct Baronetcy in England. No independent confirmation found. Probable vanity. Also nominated under identical material at Matthew Brown (Socialite). DMG413 23:54, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Claim was published in The Times and London Gazette. Entry can also be found in Who's Who. James. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.188.112.172 (talk • contribs)
Fail to see how vanity when clearly, even if forgetting claim to baronetcy and only through his father/business he is a figure of note. Wilfredclose 01:15, 19 September 2006 — Wilfredclose (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep Would agree with Wilfredclose, figure is notable. JS14877 — JS14877 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep I know I am new here, new to the internet if I am truthful, so please ignore if inappropriate comments. If the claim to the baronetcy has been established, or submitted it would perhaps suggest that the figure is one of note. Rest of biog needs more support, I would agree and would suggest allowing time for this? On balance keep. Nationalalamo — Nationalalamo (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Keep Article seems to be developing, benefit of the doubt for further source material to come? 12588 — 12588 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The result was Delete as a non-notable biography, WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 09:39, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article created by its subject, a non-notable person Blainster 23:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have witnessed this gentlemen's involvement at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, and hold him to be a trustworthy person. I met him during the Spring 2006 semester of college in the class entitled PHIL 305B Modern Philosophy: moral/political philosophy; instructed by Professor Andrew Youpa. Also, I have engaged in discussion with him and Professor Randal Auxier during Apologia meetings, a Registered Student Organization, here at SIUC. I frequently help him with his RSO's Gospel table within the SIUC student center. I also attend Mr. Mount's Temple of Faith Ministries, as conducted in the Interfaith Center here in Carbondale, IL. I have spoken via telephone to Bishop Gentry, and can verify their acquaintance and friendship. I am also a member of his Google group entitled Jesus on the Web. Likewise, almost all the things within Mathew Enoch Mount's Wikipedia page can be accessed through public records. Again, I hold him to be a trustworthy and reliable person. His page should be allowed to stay and, due to his dyslexia, only minorly revised. My name is Adam Colbert and I am a music student at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.230.135.202 (talk • contribs)
Do Not Delete - My name is Colin West and I live in Mr. Mount's Dorm. He is the real deal, I've seen his drivers license - so his name, address, and age are accurate. He also wears a priest outfit every day and goes in to very long discourse about his beliefs. No man could make up the stuff that comes out of his mouth, so it must be real. He is, indeed, an odd character, but this is no reason to delete his page. Good Day. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.230.55.99 (talk • contribs) 06:15, September 20, 2006.