The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. DS 18:58, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Archimedes Plutonium[edit]

Non-notable. Various other attempts to delete by speedy (and otherwise), but none asking the general Wikipedia community for their opinions. Mike Peel 12:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I'd say this is one of the few examples in which someone is notable as a crank. He has fame of sorts. Leibniz 12:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This guy is a legendary and inventive crank, who was a notable part of the Usenet culture in the early-mid 1990s. Wasted Time R 12:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, a notable net legend. Kusma (討論) 12:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Definitely notable - well known on Usenet. Gandalf61 14:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, legendary. Might pass the 100-year test if it were a criteria of WP:BIO, for what that's worth.–♥ «Charles A. L.» 20:43, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep widely known crank and net legend. - CNichols 21:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. He's definitely notable. --Nishkid64 22:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep -- ~PinkDeoxys~ 23:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above comments. Yamaguchi先生 23:50, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for no other reason than to inform that a genuine person exists and has the legal name of Archimedes Plutonium. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.16.56.203 (talk • contribs) 06:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.