The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete this article. Saw III is not affected by this debate. - ulayiti (talk) 18:08, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saw 3 movie[edit]

Note: there is a duplicate article at Saw III. A notice concerning this deletion has been added to the Saw III page, and it may become a combined deletion at a later date.

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Sango123 (talk) 17:44, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above. MikeWazowski 18:20, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Movie is still being kicked around as an idea at Hollywood power lunches --Ruby 18:38, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, also, as per article, um defently not cuz jigsaw defently died in the saw 2 duh! -- Dragonfiend 21:23, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here we go again. See the delete consensus from 5th November 2005: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saw III. Also see the no consensus keep from 3rd January 2006: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saw 3.

EVERYTHING in this article is speculation. There is no confirmed director. There are no confirmed cast members. According to IMDB, there have been no announcements concerning this movie since 2005, when Greg Hoffman said in a forum post that the movie was being talked about by Lions Gate Films (as an aside, he passed away a month after making this announcemnt). We have nothing verifiable about the movie at this point in time, making this, at least to me, a clear case of crystal balling.

There is a duplicate article at Saw III, and I would like to see both articles deleted, until a point in time when verifiable information (ie: press releases) concerning the production of this movie can be provided. Failing that, I would have to support a merge and redirect of "Saw 3 movie" to "Saw III".

I have taken the liberty of adding a heavily edited deletion notice to the "Saw III" article. If someone else deems it appropriate, nominate the duplicate article for a combined deletion, and replace my edited notice with the proper one. -- Saberwyn 04:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Incorrect info, Saw III article has the current correct, and referenced information. Saw III was confirmed last november and has a scheduled release date. Two actors have already been signed on, and the Saw III website is under construction. But this particular article is useless. --Fxer 07:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I think Saw III should be kept (actually, I don't think we should have any articles about upcoming films nobody has seen yet, but there are lots of others out there), but even the format of this article's title is all wrong, not to mention the content (or lack thereof). Kafziel 13:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect Saw 3 movie to Saw III. Stifle 16:33, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.