The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core desat 01:58, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lingwa de Planeta

[edit]

A non-notable constructed language. 486 [1] ghits, mostly WP, its mirrors, and yahoo/google groups. No evidence of mention in reliable, non-self published sources. Was deleted via WP:PROD in December 2006 and soon re-created. Has been tagged for notability since February 2007 with no improvements. In short, fails WP:N. Delete Aagtbdfoua 04:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it has uncertain importance. There's no evidence that any person speaks this language, or ever did, other than as an academic exercise. - Richard Cavell 11:24, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no references in reliable publications, nothing notable about it. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 12:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unsourced, unreferenced, non-neutral and bordering on an advert - iridescenti (talk to me!) 12:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. I notice that almost the identical article has been added to Esperanto Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-noteable, unsourced, and no assertion of notability.--Ybbor ^Talk Survey! 14:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Ybbor. Another random attempt at making up a new language. Stifle (talk) 17:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.