The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 04:38, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Khizr-i-Rah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches in English and Urdu turn up little in the way of significant coverage to satisfy GNG. Opting for AFD over PROD as the Urdu source searches are machine translated as I don't speak it myself. SITH (talk) 14:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Ruyaba (talk) 15:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. This is a 12-page academic paper about this poem, this paper calls it "famous" and this one calls it "well-known". Phil Bridger (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Some sources use the transcription "Khizr-e-Rah" and I'm sure there are other possibilities:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Phil Bridger (talk) 15:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep there are plenty of sources for this. I haven't put any in yet because I seem to spend so much time these days working on AfDed articles, but I may get to it. Mccapra (talk) 19:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.