The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kenny Clutch

[edit]
Kenny Clutch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:CRIME. reddogsix (talk) 02:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
WP:EVENT says "A rule of thumb for creating a Wikipedia article is whether the event is of lasting, historical significance". Do you really think that the shooting of a non-notable, virtually-unknown rapper is of lasting, historical significance? --76.189.111.199 (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The event received significant coverage; BIO1E applies to the victim. Note I stated I am not saying whether the event will receive continued coverage; I do not have a crystal ball to know if it will be the case or not.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi RCLC. :) Exactly... we don't know. But we need to know. I didn't cite BIO1E; I cited WP:EVENT. At this moment, we of course cannot determine that this event will have lasting, historical significance (although I'm sure most reasonable people will say it probably never will). And significant coverage, which you cited, is simply a section of the general notability guidelines, which are superseded by the more important WP:EVENT guidelines, which are specific to events. This is explained in its Background section. At this point, it's simply a news story getting a lot of coverage because of its movie-style nature and location (a drive-by shooting of an aspiring rapper in the heart of the Las Vegas strip, resulting in the crash of several vehicles). If the story should get to the point where editors determine that the event is clearly historically important, then by all means we should have an article for it. I appreciate your balanced input in this discussion. And I really like your name, even though I have no idea what it means. :P --76.189.111.199 (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:NEWSEVENT. "A rule of thumb for creating a Wikipedia article is whether the event is of lasting, historical significance". --76.189.111.199 (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.