The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles 09:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Militello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm helping out an IP here [1]. "This Article has been nominated for deletion for the following reasons: WP:FAILN and WP:SPIP" Thank you - I'm the IP. 2.97.116.154 (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I've expanded and updated/improved the article a little, adding a number of references. Honors and awards include several of substance. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Keep? Wp:notability looks probable and possibly established. Article needs work. North8000 (talk) 02:17, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Neutral, leaning delete Uncertain the notability of the prizes. Google searches yielded many results, although the reliability of these sites are questioned. Fail WP:BASIC. Sp33dyphil ^{"Ad astra"} 12:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A relatively close call, but I think that peer recognition like this [2] and a significant award nomination by Marilyn Hacker is enough to create a presumption of notability that hasn't been refuted (if even dented). Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:17, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.