The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helicon Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Helicon Systems does not appear notable, article has been around since 2003 and has no references. It is me i think (talk) 20:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. About the only pages I could find through Google referring to Helicon Systems are mirrors of either this page or Unisys ICON. Would also support a redirect to Unisys ICON since the only products they made seemed to be for the ICON. Blair - Speak to me 23:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete in favour. It is me i think (talk) 01:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Unisys ICON, next to no information that couldn't be easily incorporated into the Unisys article.  Atyndall93 | talk  11:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, non-notable tech company. While I wouldn't object to a redirect, I think it's a bit of a stretch topicwise between this and Unisys ICON. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete - this two sentence article cannot stand on its own. Redirecting to Unisys ICON is not advisable as there is too much "distance" between the two (manufacturing a component of a larger system does not mean that the company is linked directly to the system to an extent that merits a redirect). B.Wind (talk) 03:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.