The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete: G5. Created by an obvious sockpuppet of blocked user User:Hayatgm. --Kinu ^t/_c 19:35, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gurzain (Poetry)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. Claims that this is the first book of Khowar poetry are not supported by reliable sources, and are refuted by the presence of the List of Khowar poets, which lists this book's author as merely the last in a list of poets in this language. The article is also shamelessly promotional and largely copied (although not verbatim) from its sole source: the Wordpress site set up to promote the book. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - spam for non-notable genre. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:27, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per lack of notability. Obvious promotional article. Wikicology (talk) 21:40, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:NB and WP:RS. Fai zan 17:12, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be deleted because this article contains much information about the mentioned book, which is not available in any where.Ishtiaq Naqi

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.