- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Glossary of motorsport terms. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:08, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Grip (auto racing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only external link is dead; the article itself looks like more a dictionary definition. Mark Ekimov (talk) 12:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. When you encounter a dead reference or external link, you can often find an archived version of the page at the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, http://web.archive.org/ That's what I did just now, and I also added some other references. Another option would be to merge it into Glossary of motorsport terms. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - On the one hand Wikipedia is not a dictionary and in it's current form that is all this is. On the other hand, this subject is essentially two concepts in one - mechanical grip and aerodynamic grip. These two terms, at first glance, do seem to be suitable for an encylopic entry, and putting them together in one article, or two articles where Grip (auto racing) is a disambigation could both be potential ideas.SSSB (talk) 09:13, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.