The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Lachowski

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N; doesn't have the coverage. The references are mostly agency profiles and his homepage; Google News turns up only two hits - one website doing a slideshow of models when they were babies and the other just a photo shoot credit. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 20:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: An editor added several new references, none of which provides significant coverage. For example, the editor referenced an Armani PR piece and UK Telegraph article but omitted links that show this subject is in both cases just a listed name. Another case is the "Carbon Copy" link, which is simply a reprinted editorial without analysis. Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 17:18, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:02, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep currently ranked #25 at models.com for male models doing commercial work [1], independent sources include NY Magazine profile [2]. Having difficulties finding other sources but possibly because there's so much junk about him online. Also note that google news no longer finds news older than 30 days so a lack of hits there isn't necessarily indicative. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I found an interview from NY magazine: [3] Amethyst1234 (talk) 01:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per Calliopejen1 and the few reliable sources noted; one of the top in the world currently in his field. Google News archive is still down. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.