The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Delete. Even if it has been published in one source, that's still not enough to get it past WP:NFT. It doesn't really meet any of the speedy criteria, but there's no way in hell that this is a valid article. It almost asserts non-notability, and being published in December 2007 doesn't make it notable if it was invented in May 2006.--h i ss p a c er e s e a r c h23:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.