The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep/not nominated for AfD. —Мандичка^YO 😜 14:54, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chitral[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a page consist of many vandalism. I want to delete any recreate with full refrence Saqraat (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed header, and close/speedy keep since nom is not proposing complete deletion. AfD is not for cleanup: for major overhaul that you feel legitimate, start a discussion at the article talk page to be safe, work on a separate userspace/draft-namespace draft, or just boldly replace now at the mainspace if you have the good sources as you say to support it. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 12:53, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 22. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:59, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.