- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep as a bad-faith nomination by obvious socks. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:56, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Chitrali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfDView log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
the chitrali word is only use for Chitrali people which is already redirected to kho people this page in hoaxTransformer X (talk) 06:52, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The disambiguation points to more than the ethnic group (the language is apparently also known as "Chitrali", according to its article), and would therefore seem appropriate to maintain. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:03, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete This article is hoax the page must not remain anymore here there are many pages are linked with this page.37.111.128.166 (talk)
- Comment - BigHaz this whole AfD appears to be manipulated by SPAs (including the nominator). Your vote was immediately struck. I suggest an immediate closure.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I have restored BigHaz' !vote from the history. --bonadea contributions talk 08:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete chitrali is used for Kho people Chitrali people page is already existed and redirected to kho people. Please delete soon. Xirexxor (talk) 07:36, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete this is a pure hoax strongly delete. Giphy (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:41, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there's obvious vote brigading here. Power~enwiki (talk) 07:53, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - no valid rationale for deleting, existing demonym and a valid dab page. --bonadea contributions talk 08:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete chitrali is not correct absolutely hoax and history of this page telling us it was recently edit by sockpuppetors, this page must be delete.Chitral CSX (talk) 08:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FTR: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akbaralighazi. --bonadea contributions talk 08:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.