The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a7, made-up game, created under this title after repeated speedy deletions and salting of Chicago Ball; WP:SNOW for those being picky about the speedy categories. NawlinWiki 22:23, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chicag ball

[edit]

non-notable game invented by author. We really need a speedy category for this kind of thing. Kww 19:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was not the inventor of the game, but this is a new game. Is there serious president for deleting entry's due purely to their notability? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emblemcycling (talk • contribs) 19:35, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, absolutely, otherwise every band, person, company, website, anything could have an article. Please take a read of our notability guidelines. J Milburn 19:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom (NN). There really should be a speedy category called "DUH". - Rjd0060 19:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, only invented the day before the article was created. WP:NFT. Hut 8.5 19:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:N. Also of note is that the game was just invented yesterday. STORMTRACKER 94 19:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the game was not invented the day before the article was posted, the game was first played, the day before the article was written. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emblemcycling (talk • contribs) 20:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Which is completely irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that if the game was first played yesterday, it's completely and totally not notable. Delete. Smashville 21:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7. Gross violation of WP:NFT. Caknuck 20:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can't A7, because it isn't about a "real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content".Kww 20:24, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.