The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caughman Road Elementary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

School that fails WP:N, WP:V, hasn't really expanded at all, plus prod was contested by the WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument. Wizardman 03:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Little evidence of notability. The In Tech section reads a little like an ad. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 03:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not enough matter to satisfy Wikipedia:Schools. Anthony Appleyard 10:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Elementary schools don't have the same assumption of notability as high schools, and this article doesn't give any evidence that would fulfil the standard. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- TerriersFan 19:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. No encyclopedic content. Stifle (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:N and WP:A. Most decent schools are moving to a constructivist method, so this is hardly notable, and it is not sourced in any event. --Butseriouslyfolks 19:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unless a user can improve the article, expand the article to include some content and locate a few references the article in is current state should be deleted. LordHarris 20:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.