The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft redirect to wiktionary entry. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caput

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like another WP:DICTDEF, mostly unreferenced, failing at WP:GNG. Wikitionary entry will suffice for such entities. Ps. Note that this was transwikid even back in the very early days (2006) but apparently restored and survived till now. A quick glance at Category:Latin words and phrases suggests we have some major house cleaning to do here... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 14:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree, it's DICDEF, could be copied to an online dictionary with the same formatting/content and it would be at home there. Nothing we need in wiki. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Wiktionary entry. Just a list of uses for the word. Waddles 🗩 🖉 20:57, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Soft redirect to the Wiktionary entry. While Wikipedia is not a dictionary, Wiktionary is. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:30, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.