The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was transwikied already. Johnleemk | Talk 14:44, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Caput[edit]

Dicdef that can't possibly grow into an article we don't already have. Daniel Case 22:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It could be useful for the people to know that caput exists both as bone/body part and as a disease. It serves as a redirection, just like the CNS --www.doc 22:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added the disambiguation as a footnote, I hope it's alright now--www.doc 23:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have the right idea with the transwiki link. I'm going to suggest that's what you do ... take all those entries to the Wiktionary entry for caput. It is not a disambiguation page, and can't be, since it links to no other articles named "Caput." Thus it's really not encyclopedic, nor is it likely to be, and thus wiktionary is the best place for it. I will add the appropriate tag. Daniel Case 02:26, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. Thanks for the help with the tagging.

• delete. No articles - no disambig pages. At the moment these are just dicdefs. `'mikka (t) 18:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've already transfered it there.--www.doc 22:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.