The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 19:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CAMAH flag

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is a flag of an organizational with dubious importance. The article about the origination was deleted twice: 1, 2 already. I nominated it for speedy deletion, however, the tag was removed by DGG[1]. If the article of the origination is deleted, its flag and the article about its leader (Piruz Dilanchi) should also be deleted. Tanhatanha (talk) 07:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 13. Snotbot t • c » 09:38, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Persian Vandalism is one of the Persian chauvinism's anti South Azerbaijan jobs in Wikipedia. Group of Persian chauvinism attacks any article about South Azerbaijan, Iranian Kurdistan and Iranian Arabs. We ask the Wikipedia's administration to STOP this discrimination. Please! Aztap (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not notable. The sources are mainly to the South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement's website, the organisation whose flag it is, so they can hardly be considered independent or providing any notability. Additionally, neither of the English language references provide any information at all about the flag, other than a picture (I can't read Azeri or whatever language the third source is in). Finally, there is the question of why we need an article on a flag of a non-notable organisation: to me that would require the flag to be of particular artistic/design importance (if Pablo Picasso designed a flag it would be notable no matter whose flag it was) or if its creation or history was interesting in some other way, but there is no evidence of that. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete , Last time , the result of an AfD about an article with same name but different flag was to delete , this time same logic not only still exist , but also it is more clear that no such a flag exists out of imagination of the editors who created that ! Perhaps if I was going to search for a new gallery similar to previous one , the result would be more numerous ...--Alborz Fallah (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.