The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:22, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement[edit]

South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted article. Third party editor with very similar name to the article creator declined the CSD request, so to be on the safe side, I brought it back to AfD. I'm not claiming any socking, but if it looks like a duck... GregJackP Boomer! 16:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does it needs another AfD ?! It do has the criteria for Speedy Deletion ! --Alborz Fallah (talk) 17:06, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No--examining the previously deleted article, the present one is a complete rewrite, removing a good deal of the wildly excessive material in the previous article. the other. This is not an opinion on whether the present article should be kept; I am just saying it needs a new discussion. DGG ( talk ) 18:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - If only because I can't find a way to whack it with "Recreation of Deleted material". DGG is correct, this may be the same subject and same author, but it is not the same article... Sadly. I'd love to whack it, but I can't morally commit to a delete. -T.I.M(Contact) 03:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • [[#ref_(({1))}|^]] : I am not an Admin, but I distinctly remember crossing this article in the AfD queue quite a while ago. My evidence is circumstantial. T.I.M(Contact) 03:13, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 09:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.