The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Result was Speedy close, wrong venue. This belongs at WP:RFD. - Revolving Bugbear 14:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 797 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Deletion was already supported in 2005; the article Boeing 797 is back again and still has no substantiated references and is not even explained in the redirect article; see Boeing 797 talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolypolyman (talk • contribs)

• Keep - This is not an article, but a redirct. The redirect is in place simply because Boeng's next airliner is likey to be on of the Yellowstone projects, and likely to be assigned "797". Since this is apparenly not understandable to some without an explicit cited explanation, we could redirect it instead to Boeing 7x7, which simply explaines what the designations mean, and lists the current ones. However, "797" is not mentioned there either, so this page is likely to be AFDed again in the future. - BillCJ (talk) 06:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep and Remove Tag - as noted above it's a redirect, and seemingly a useful one as well. However it currently doesn't work due to the addition of the tag. I say speedy keep and remove the tag so it can go back to be useful and working again. Canterbury Tail talk 12:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.