The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:04, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation on an unannounced aircraft. How do we know whether the 797 will be a 747 replacement or a 737 replacement? Andros 1337 03:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• This model of aircraft appears to be completely unverifiable. The only even vaguely reliable things that research turns up are nothing more than speculative "what the world will be like 40 years from now" pieces that mention, in passing, people travelling in Boeing 797s. There's not even reliable speculation on what the aircraft might be, or even that there will be such an aircraft at all. Delete. Uncle G 04:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Speculation upon speculation.Davidrowe 09:10, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is just speculation. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Pure speculation. A completely new Boeing plane is likely a decade away, and the name usually isn't chosen until around the time there are some customers on board. — RJH 16:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, unless it can be cleaned-up very well, we shoud delete it-ColumbusCrew29 00:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - "as yet unannounced" WP:NOT a crystal ball. --Meiers Twins 11:38, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.