The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 03:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond Postmodernism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Breaching normal standards of wiki-manners by nominating this for deletion while it's still under construction, but this is clearly never going to be appropriate content. A totally unreferenced piece of original research and to make it valid would involve wiping it completely and starting again. — iridescent 19:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete POV essay. Get a blog. WillOakland (talk) 19:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete speculative original research, useful content already covered in post-modernism.Nick Connolly (talk) 19:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok guys, don't worry; please delete my contribution on the subject if you wish. I just wanted to make a sincere contribution on the subject, while there is lots of confusion out-there, see also the discussion about the article on post-postmodernism. You are right, a blg is a better forum for this! Thankx! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erasmus2000 (talk • contribs) 20:56, April 20, 2008

• Delete no references, essay-like content, non-encyclopedia.  Atyndall93 | talk  11:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no sources. Yahel Guhan 02:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Original research. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 03:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.