The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all . Single keep argument is invalid and single merge comment does not provide evidence. Creation of redirects after deletion left to editorial discretion. lifebaka++ 14:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Gurung

[edit]

This article is being nominated for deletion along with 11 other biographical pages, all in the category Miss Nepal Contestants. The winners and the second runner ups of the Miss Nepal beauty contest may be worthy of mention, but they are already present in the larger article, Miss Nepal. Maedin (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

   I am also nominating the following related pages for deletion:
   :Ayushma Pokharel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Bandana Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Sarah Gurung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Malvika Subba (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Prerana Shah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Payal Shakya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Ayusha Shrestha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Sitashma Chand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Sugarika KC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Usha Khadgi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
   :Shavona Shrestha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

you want to merge all of the pages or delete them? Protonk (talk) 19:41, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Either. I thought a merge seemed reasonable; but I am not a very experienced editor, and others may feel that deletion is more appropriate. They all appear to have been created by a single user; I thought that he may be willing to table them into a single article, if that is the consensus here. Maedin (talk) 19:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, just asking. You'll find at AfD that editors and admins tend to frown upon up front merger requests. this is because AfD is a community process with enforced results. In other words, at the conclusion of this, some admin will delete or keep the page without further discussion. Mergers done this way tend to A: be inartful (as the admin is not likely to be a subject matter expert) and B: be contentious (as normal merger discussions have no time limit). so you may want to modify your nomination to reflect that deletion might be an outcome you desire as well. Also, please note WP:BEFORE, which gives suggestions (not necessarily binding) about what avenues to try before coming to AfD. Protonk (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, I see. I will make it clearer. Maedin (talk) 20:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sure thing. If you have any other questions about the process you can ask them on the talk page for afd or on my talk page. I've linked your category link above. If you think that was not appropriate, let me know or undo it. Thanks. Protonk (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Maedin (talk) 07:14, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comment Although I noted to the nominator that a merger suggestion in the AfD nomination is usually avoided, I think one possible outcome from this AfD could be a redirect from the listed articles to the parent article, Miss Nepal, presuming they aren't notable or are not sourced well enough for BLP. So in this case I'm provisionally supporting a redirect. Protonk (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:NepaliBoy7, the creator of the articles, has been going around removing AfD tags, and posting bogus protection templates in order to subvert the deletion process. I have left a warning for him on his talk page, asking him to some here to defend 'his' articles Ohconfucius (talk) 05:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Though there are not notable. I guess all should be merged into something like List of Miss Nepal something like that. --SkyWalker (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (or substantially cut down on the information and merge). While no objection to a list of the winners of a contest (which contest may itself be notable) these articles fail to meet numerous guidelines including notability (entertainers), people notable only for one event, and what Wikipedia is not. Feel free to weigh in on a similar AfD discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Ann Suinner.Bongomatic (talk) 08:28, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An IP address (maybe NepaliBoy7?? is removing the AfD tags again and protecting the pages. Am I able to revert these edits? Maedin (talk) 07:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup you can revert his edits. Be Bold--SkyWalker (talk) 07:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn biogs. Mayalld (talk) 09:52, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Notable enough for single article certainly, this is important event in Nepal Sherpa from Nepal (talk) 10:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Because they are very beautiful women NEver yer PAL (talk) 12:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.